Modern archery enthusiasts stayed up late to study the Three Kingdoms, and suddenly died and became Liu Ji, the young master of Qu'a in the Eastern Han Dynasty. The original owner was fifteen years old and was incompetent in both writing and martial arts. He drew a bow and pretended to be brave and fell unconscious. He was a complete loser of the Three Kingdoms.
I thought it would be difficult to go through the hell at the beginning, but I didn't expect the system from heaven. I expected the power of the Overlord and Zhuge's cunning to come to my side. However, the system picked up the Northern Song Dynasty archer Wang Shunchen template across time and space. The eagle eye, iron arm, and infinite continuous fire were all fully loaded. What's even more amazing was that the system ran away after it was installed. There were no panels, malls, or tasks, and the main feature was a naked Goddess!
From then on, Young Master Qu'a changed his look like a good-for-nothing. He could draw a bow with two stones effortlessly, cross a Yang Yang with a hundred steps, all of which were basic skills. He specialized in shooting birds buttocks, and archery came with a bad virtue buff. While others relied on power and tactics to fight for hegemony in the Three Kingdoms, he relied on his magic archery skills to run rampant and thrive in troubled times. He accidentally became the number one marksman in the Three Kingdoms that no one dared to mess with!
A fall and enlightenment? This is pure nonsense. This is the top-level archery skill given to us by the system for free. This is the accuracy of archery. Why do we always aim at the butt!
Reader comments
It's still pretty good-looking. It doesn't have the routines of some other systematic writings. The ideas are different and the angle is novel.
You can stop, no one can leave anymore, just stop at this moment.
If it is not systematic, it does not mean that the article is logical. There are some small problems, but they are understandable and readable. It is close to history.
It's still pretty good-looking. It doesn't have the routines of some other systematic writings. The ideas are different and the angle is novel.
You can stop, no one can leave anymore, just stop at this moment.
If it is not systematic, it does not mean that the article is logical. There are some small problems, but they are understandable and readable. It is close to history.