The dynasty we are going to talk about only has a lifespan of fifteen years in the history books. How short is it? You may not be able to find a place for it even if you fail in three years of college entrance examination and five years of simulation.
Its founder, Wang Mang, can be called the "mudslide" in the world of Chinese emperors. When other emperors usurped the throne, they had to show some face and go through the motions in a secretive way; this man didn't, he just asked the people of the whole country to sign a letter begging him to ascend the throne. This kind of treatment is unique for five thousand years.
But as the saying goes, the higher you praise, the harder you fall.
When he begins to implement the "perfect system" dug out of old papers into reality, we will see how a genius who was promoted to a pedestal by public opinion gradually turned into a public enemy.
Reader comments
I'm not sure if it's AI, so I'll just talk about my feelings. He keeps piling up a lot of adjectives. You can see that he wrote a paragraph of more than a hundred words in order to write a metaphor. It doesn't even contain a bit of history. It's just some self-speculated psychological descriptions of the characters. It's just watery. There are some mistakes in history. Then he didn't arrange the order according to historical order and inserted it randomly. But I didn't understand the intention, so I started reading. It may be strange. If a novice wants to understand the new dynasty through this, it may be biased. If you really want to understand the new dynasty, I recommend reading "Xiangrui". His writing is also concise and easy to understand, that is, compared to the author's this book, he does not have long paragraphs of metaphors, and the coverage of what he talks about is wider than the author's. I think if you pursue conciseness and easy to understand and abandon history, it will be somewhat indifferent.
I'm not sure if it's AI, so I'll just talk about my feelings. He keeps piling up a lot of adjectives. You can see that he wrote a paragraph of more than a hundred words in order to write a metaphor. It doesn't even contain a bit of history. It's just some self-speculated psychological descriptions of the characters. It's just watery. There are some mistakes in history. Then he didn't arrange the order according to historical order and inserted it randomly. But I didn't understand the intention, so I started reading. It may be strange. If a novice wants to understand the new dynasty through this, it may be biased. If you really want to understand the new dynasty, I recommend reading "Xiangrui". His writing is also concise and easy to understand, that is, compared to the author's this book, he does not have long paragraphs of metaphors, and the coverage of what he talks about is wider than the author's. I think if you pursue conciseness and easy to understand and abandon history, it will be somewhat indifferent.