Tian Mu Reviews History, Leaving the Ancestors of Every Dynasty Speechless

Is it normal for everyone to have opinions on this kind of ranking of historical texts? But I think the author was quite objective when he finished the list. Why is there too much subjectivity? If you say there are more subjective attitudes just because of the ranking, then you win. I think the author didn't include anything overly subjective when talking about his merits and demerits. At least I've read a lot of historical articles and this really isn't too subjective. If you don't believe me, let me share a few books to see how subjective you are. Where is Chui Qin? Emperor Zheng Ge ranked first because he blew Qin's hair. I was really out of ideas. Look forward to the upcoming feature on poets!! (Actually, this is how it is when ranking things like history. There are always people who find reasons to say that your ranking is inappropriate. Well, I think there is no need to hold on to this as long as it is not too excessive.) (Unless the ranking is too wild, haha) (ps actually, I personally think Zhu Di is ahead of Zhu Yuanzhang emm) Some people in the book review were scolding Wu Zetian for taking zero seconds to guess his gender haha Did the author rank Wu Zetian very high??? You only know that you have seen it but not the merit, right? Not to mention that Wu Ze was genius for more than ten years I've seen her ranked in the top ten on wild rankings before. (I won't say which book it is here)

It can be regarded as a good and relatively objective book among the Tianmu books. The problem is that a lot of private information is added in. Especially when talking about the Song Dynasty, the author obviously added his own preferences as history. Nowadays, the Internet likes to talk about the weak Song Dynasty. There are still many people who are afraid of Song Dynasty, but there are also many people who have begun to look at history with a brain, even Song Huizong and Song Gaozong. They look at historical issues objectively and will not deny the advantages or disadvantages of historical figures, rather than the kind of people who either blindly praise or blindly belittle.

It is one of the rare Tianmu fair articles that does not deny its merits and mistakes and is not ignorant. Unlike other types of protagonists, the character he likes is brainless and does not mention his faults at all. To some annoying people, he only talks about his merits and mistakes, but makes no mistakes.

The author would like to make a small comment. There are many strange women in Chinese history. Some are in power, such as Dou Yifang, Liu E..., Some are in medicine, Yi Jian, Chun Yuyan..., Men can be divided into famous generals and civil servants. Can women also be divided into several categories? The term "wonderful women" cannot be generalized. Just replied

After reading 20 chapters, the writing is okay. Each dynasty is taken into account, but there is always something that says to kick out the Qing, Yuan, and Jin. Then you should change the history of China. I would like to give the author a small suggestion. You can also write about special periods. If I get really stuck in the future and I don't know what to write, I will write about system upgrades, and then bring in famous people in the world. You can also popularize world history and the history of science. [Congratulations]

There are only a handful of objective celestial texts. Although writing such historically related celestial texts is indispensable for subjectivity, it mainly depends on whether it can maintain objective judgment, which is not bad. Can recommend it.

Awesome. This is the best book I have ever seen. The author's knowledge reserve is very rich and his writing style is fluent and fluent, which is comparable to that of the ancient masters.

There are so many books to read. To be honest, I have read novels. It is normal to have some personal opinions. It is called a history book if it is completely objective.

Good-looking, super good-looking, extremely good-looking, incomparably good-looking

I want to know whether the return gifts given by the ancestors are for national research, used by myself, or exchanged with the system for something else.