1895: the Rise of Nanzhou

@ Nanhua's cultural confidence is normal, but Hanfu should be simplified. In the era of industrialization, wide robes with large sleeves will gradually become more convenient for upper-class non-manual workers. It is recommended to simplify Hanfu, similar to modern suits, and develop a new style of Hanfu, which can be called "Huazhuang" or "Eastern suit". Of course, this is what foreigners call our new Hanfu. We ourselves call it "New Hanfu" and "Modern Hanfu" In addition, during the Tang, Song, and Ming dynasties, textile technology gradually advanced for ancient workers, and they all wore trousers. The clothes worn by farmers and craftsmen were narrow-sleeved and short-sleeved shirts. Because they were poor, they could not afford wide-sleeved robes and it was inconvenient to work. Workers must work in the machine room of the factory and must have narrow sleeves and long trousers. Their clothing should not be too loose or too tight, and their hair should not be long, otherwise work-related injuries may easily occur. Therefore, long hair must be shaved off and become short hair, which is inevitable due to industrialization. However, the clothing system must have evolved into modern clothing from Eastern China itself, retaining features such as the right gusset and Ming-style Hanfu buckles (not centipede buckles, that's really ugly!). Of course, there are also double-breasted clothing, but they are different from Western modern clothing.

It is a relatively novel writing method among works with the same theme. Although the author is suspected of writing it for himself (bad smile), overall it is still relatively good. The author's introduction to weapons and equipment could be more detailed. I have been communicating with the author about the plot and equipment for several months, and it must be five stars [laughing]

The author who writes more than 10,000 words a day is a good author.

It's very good at the moment. It's just one chapter a day. Look at all the authors who update twice a day. You can't start like this. Even the donkeys in the production team don't dare to rest like this [laughter]

After reading Chapter 5, I feel that although it is an imaginary historical novel, it still lacks historical rigor, and the protagonist is not the prince at all, and the introduction does not introduce that the third prince traveled through time (I felt so when I saw Chapter 5). In summary, it is still 5🌟, after all🍅 This kind of subject is too rare, so I still need to encourage it, and the author has also consulted a lot of information, which is good

Not bad, the writing is okay, worth reading

Needless to say, perfect score. I have three accounts on two mobile phones and a tablet, and have read for 20,000 hours. It is my first time to comment, and my first time to click on "Power for Love" (mainly because my salary is not high and I don't have much money, please forgive me (^_^)a)

It's a good book, don't be fooled by the cover.

After reading Chapter 8, I discovered that King Gui is a time traveler.

The writing is very good, but it would be better if there is a map in the article.

This kind of book without a single protagonist is quite interesting [like][like][like]

The content of 20 chapters feels much richer than the content of 50 to 100 chapters! OK!

In a parallel world, Chinese people wear Hanfu and become a powerful country, which is quite cool.

The author writes very well, but one chapter a day is a little missing.

A wave of support. More than 1W updated every day

It's very well written and I checked a lot of information.

It's very rich, but the details are very rough and it's hard to see it more realistically, but at least you can keep watching.

Good looking, good looking, good looking

Not bad, worth recommending

Awesome author, love you

There is no rating, so let me give you a five-star review.

I feel like I can collect a lot of money. . . . We have the same culture and species, hundreds of millions of compatriots

This is China. Cool

Very well written, keep up the good work

It's very well written, keep it up

Is the total steel production in 1899 wrong?

It's innovative and more interesting than other founding articles.

It's very logical, not pure AI, it's a good pastime