I Transmigrated to the 1950s to Become a High-Ranking Official

As soon as I got there, I kept dragging three of them, and I still had to help my younger brother buy a house, and now I have my deceased husband's in-laws. . . . Undoubtedly a blood pack I wrote a four-star review for the main character, but the author criticized her behavior, unhealthy outlook on life, and moral corruption. In order to live up to her evaluation, I added a negative review. I hope that Tomato will recommend less articles to me in the future that claim that the heroine lives her own career. In fact, the whole article is altruistic and unilateral. After reading this kind of female video article, it is my turn to win a prize with no side effects.

Originally, I didn't want to pay attention to the comments about the blood packs, but I couldn't help but there were always some people who hadn't read the original text and sent messages to provoke and ridicule them. I couldn't bear it anymore, so I had to say something. Interested readers can check the original text by clicking on the chapters mentioned below. Let me first explain the background: The comment was posted less than thirty minutes after the other party read it. The comment time was shown as April 25, 2026, and the specific time period was not displayed in the background. Before 19:00 that day, I had updated to Chapter 71, and before 23:00, I had updated to Chapter 74. It takes less than half an hour to read at least 71 chapters. I don't know if others can do it, but I certainly can't. Next, I will respond to the three points in the comments: one for three, helping my brother buy a house, and my parents-in-law. About helping my brother buy a house: This content is clearly mentioned in the middle and latter part of Chapter 70, and it was purchased with the property left by the parents. There is no plot where the heroine gives money to her brother to buy a house. I don't know if that person didn't see it, or if he saw it but turned a blind eye on purpose, or if he acquiesced that the parents' property kept by the heroine should belong to the heroine alone, and sharing it with his younger brother is a blood bag? And regarding this topic, there are relevant supplementary contents in Chapters 83, 84 and 98. Questions about in-laws: This content is explained in Chapters 71-73. The heroine was tired of taking care of the children, had to drag the children to work overtime, was unable to go on business trips, and other reasons. Due to the background of the times, the heroine could not hire a nanny, so she chose to bring her in-laws over to help look after the children. But the comments say that the heroine is a blood bag and pays unilaterally. According to this commenter's logic, is it natural for the parents-in-law to help take care of the children, and it does not count as contribution, only the heroine's support for the parents-in-law does? Regarding the issue of one to three: If the commentator thinks that the heroine should not take back the three children, she should let them stay in Yan'an Nursery and work on their own careers, otherwise they will be a blood bag. And this is the core background of the novel's setting, which will not change due to the dissatisfaction of a certain reader.

I have just read the latest chapter. Overall, it is very good. The author's writing is very good and the story is also good. The heroine is very caring. She takes care of her parents-in-law not just for reputation, but she truly sympathizes with their experiences and works hard to change the fate of the two old people. As for my career, it was handled well, but it was a little too smooth. In that era, there were many gangsters of all kinds, but this aspect was not handled very well. It seemed too safe!

It's pretty good. I saw comments about blood packs and I was really angry. Just ignore people like this. It's not worth it. Come on, more updates. Don't be misled by the blood bag theory!!! Anyone who can say such things is nothing more than a vampire.

Very good! The only thing wrong is that the heroine, a battalion commander, changed her job and became an office clerk? So those ten years of being a soldier were in vain? Anyway, the heroine feels too aggrieved to suffer this loss!

I haven't started reading this book yet, but I know one thing from reading the comments. That is, some people in the comment section want the heroine to accept the connections and resources of the original owner, but they don't want the heroine to be in charge of her own children and younger brother. To be honest, if the original owner's children and younger brother are white-eyed wolves, their deceased husband's The heroine can completely ignore the person whose parents are extremely partial, and wants the heroine to ignore the original owner's relatives. The heroine also uses the original owner's personal network resources. The heroine herself is just a white-eyed wolf, stepping on the original owner's human blood steamed buns to improve herself. She is not the so-called selfish person with three wrong views.

First of all, author, you have created such a domineering system. Why do you make me want to beat this system to death so much? But at the same time, it is described from the side that the heroine is indeed a good player in politics, because in the face of this kind of system, he can calmly raise his own questions. And make reasonable demands to benefit yourself. Emotionally stable and capable. Very level. Mark it first. This is rare on the site, where the female protagonist takes a political line. Chronology

The front part is pretty good, but regarding the comment section saying that the heroine helps the poor, I personally don't think it is true (if the author hasn't changed the article). The heroine and her parents-in-law are not top-notch, they are very normal lonely old people with a miserable life, and the children are too old. The heroine takes her parents-in-law back, firstly, they can help take care of the children, secondly, the parents-in-law are poor farmers, thirdly, her husband has a pension and the parents-in-law have a share, and fourthly, the heroine has arranged a job for her parents-in-law, so they are not free of charge. The heroine's brother bought a house with gold bars left by their parents, but the author doesn't seem to mention whether they spent it all. In addition, the heroine may need her younger brother to serve as a soldier in the future for her career and family (preparing to go to military school as a deputy regiment). The heroine is a widow with three children, and she and her brother complement each other and maximize their interests. This was the best approach in that era. The plot is slow after entering the career line, so save it for a while and watch it again. This style of writing is getting more annoying the more I read it, because I have seen several articles with this style of writing this year. I don't know if the authors have been trained uniformly or if it has been edited by AI. The character dialogue and some detailed descriptions are exactly the same.

Very well written!!! I thought it was average but still watchable, and I gave it four stars. It was when I got to the comment section that the heroine, the Virgin, was sucked out of blood to pick up the parents of her martyr husband and returned, I felt it was elevated to five stars. Really great! The description of the heroine is getting closer and closer to a real person, no longer feeling like a paper person. Come on [send your heart][send your heart][send your heart]

Looks good, come on There is no scene in the book where the heroine buys a house for her younger brother. She bought it with the money left by her parents. That comment does not fit the content of the novel.