**I dressed as Tang Monk. **
Not Sun Wukong, not Zhu Bajie.
It was Tang Sanzang who was used as lunch by monsters throughout the whole process, was so angry by his disciples that he vomited blood, and no one even remembered his name after taking the sutra.
But I have read the original work.
I know which difficulties are God's will and which difficulties are arranged by someone.
I know that behind the Eighty-one Dilemma, there are many chess players wearing the coat of "compassion".
I know that the circle on Sun Wukong's head is not a punishment - it is a cage.
Therefore, in the Dharma field, I did not say, "The poor monk will go."
I said: **I have conditions. **
---
This is not a story about enlightenment.
This is the story of a group of people who were treated as chess pieces and finally overturned the chessboard.
Master, you said we went to the West to obtain scriptures. What did we obtain? *
Choose one answer, live on your knees or die standing. *
Reader comments
Cultural workers must be literate, and this book is a typical negative teaching material. Writing a book cannot be just about imagination and ideas. This idea can be understood as ideas, concepts, or fundamentals. Of course, the most important thing is to be literate. Really, I really doubt that the author has not read the original work, or even only watched the TV series.
Cultural workers must be literate, and this book is a typical negative teaching material. Writing a book cannot be just about imagination and ideas. This idea can be understood as ideas, concepts, or fundamentals. Of course, the most important thing is to be literate. Really, I really doubt that the author has not read the original work, or even only watched the TV series.