[Suspense reasoning + live broadcast + unlimited streaming + reversal explosion + IQ online]
The game comes to Blue Star. You can win 10 million by clearing the level. If you fail, you will become an NPC in the game. Until now, no one has survived!
But I, a suspense mystery writer, took the initiative to enter this death game.
After failing the first game, I was deprived of my vision,
The second time I struggled in the blurry darkness throughout the game, I died again at the hands of the real murderer.
Third and last chance.
I started with the extreme pain of dismembering my body with a chainsaw. Even breathing felt like being tortured. There was only a blur of light and shadow in front of my eyes. The audience in the live broadcast room was betting that I would not survive ten minutes.
No one knows that this hellish debuff is my strongest weapon.
In a sealed supermarket, thirteen people were trapped in a secret room, gangsters broke in, and serial murders broke out one after another. The real murderer was hidden among the survivors.
Everyone was panicking, but I was in severe pain, tearing apart every detail, every hint, and every layer of disguise.
The murderer you thought was just a smokescreen.
The truth you see is just the script I want you to see.
The audience in the live broadcast room exploded: Damn it! Is this blind man using God's perspective? !
The game designers were hinting at this from the beginning:
"Kill or be killed."
Is that person hiding in the dark really just another person?
Reader comments
Connotative spoilers
The first copy: IQ online, hard-core reasoning
The second copy: Begin to be ambiguous
Let me briefly talk about the first dungeon. The suspense plot is very good, the pace is a bit fast, but the plot has excellent twists and foreshadowing. I mainly want to talk about the problem I think: the author gave the clue of numbers from the beginning, and it appeared repeatedly in subsequent explorations. However, this clue is not for readers to guess how to use it based on the plot content, but is in the form of a password. The main feeling is that this clue does not have a good interaction with readers, but is for the author's own entertainment.
Is there any justice for not giving five stars to my own book?
Not bad, but I suggest changing the title
Very own ideas
Awesome, this book is definitely worth following, the twists and turns in the back are so explosive, and there are enough foreshadowings! It's just a little slower at the front. Five-star praise!
Connotative spoilers The first copy: IQ online, hard-core reasoning The second copy: Begin to be ambiguous Let me briefly talk about the first dungeon. The suspense plot is very good, the pace is a bit fast, but the plot has excellent twists and foreshadowing. I mainly want to talk about the problem I think: the author gave the clue of numbers from the beginning, and it appeared repeatedly in subsequent explorations. However, this clue is not for readers to guess how to use it based on the plot content, but is in the form of a password. The main feeling is that this clue does not have a good interaction with readers, but is for the author's own entertainment.
Is there any justice for not giving five stars to my own book?
Not bad, but I suggest changing the title
Very own ideas
Awesome, this book is definitely worth following, the twists and turns in the back are so explosive, and there are enough foreshadowings! It's just a little slower at the front. Five-star praise!