Lin Ye is an ordinary NCAA player who goes undrafted and barely lands a two-way contract with the Clippers, becoming a benchwarmer. Just when he thinks his career is over, a mysterious System suddenly appears.
His beginner’s pack contains three cards, the most eye-catching of which is an SS-rank talent card: [Wild Card]. Its effect is simple and brutal: at the start of each quarter, one stat is randomly boosted by 25 while another drops by 20. Lin Ye’s NBA career becomes a roller coaster: his shooting rises by 25 in the first quarter, turning him into a three-point sniper, then his defense drops by 20 in the second and opponents blow right past him; his defense rises by 25 in the first half, shutting down the opposing star, then his shooting drops by 20 in the second half and he keeps missing.
Sometimes he plays like a god, sometimes like a disaster. That’s the fate of a wild card.
As the games go on, Lin Ye keeps earning new cards: [Kong Hao Arrives] [Full-Power LeBron Mode] [Reaper’s Scythe] [The Magician Takes Over]… Two cards are randomly drawn before each game, making his playstyle unpredictable. No one can ever guess whether the next game will bring Curry or Shaq.
From benchwarmer to rotation player, from rotation player to star. This undrafted rookie, who started with just one wild card, is writing his own legend.
The writing is pretty good, and I can feel the protagonist's efforts. But the problem is also huge. Many protagonists' data are inconsistent. Just before they said they were shooting more than 70, they suddenly became more than 60 (this problem is more than one or two, this happened at least seven or eight times) (and it is not a metaphor of how much after adding points, it is an ordinary data introduction) There are also many scenes that are very different before and after the description. The scene in the front is still on the street, but it changes to the end of the street in the back. There are also shooting data on the court. You missed three 3-pointers at the beginning. Then you scored two 3-pointers. How did you calculate that you made 2 out of 4? And this is a basketball article. I think there should be less articles about brotherhood.
Oh, why are you keeping the broken A card?
Overall, the article is good, and the writing is detailed, but there are still quite a lot of errors in data and text. The data errors in many games are too obvious. You can see that it is indeed a process of pursuing the improvement of a hard-working protagonist. But if the protagonists in the main NBA teams rotate steadily and average five three-pointers per game, can they still guard Luka??? A three-pointer against Curry??? Still need to select?? This means that there is no mess and the national team does not have the strength and confidence to show off in front of the protagonist? We hope that the national team will be very strong and exceed the standard, and we all have expectations, but it does not mean that we should write about the national team in a parallel world. I understand the author's wish for the national team to become better. What if he is really that strong? The CBA has already surpassed the NBA, is it still used by the protagonist?? I believe that everyone who likes basketball, loves basketball and loves the country will have it, but this is not to write for self-pleasure in the novel and does not really understand the true situation of the game teams and data, as well as the real matchup situation of the game. This is okay for pure beginners, but those who really like basketball and watch the game will have a bad impression. I hope the author can polish the work carefully, and I hope the author will write better next time.
The black mother of the teammate who has always appeared before always makes chicken soup for the protagonist to replenish the body. After all, the United States does make chicken soup, but only adds celery and onions. But why would a black American eat dumplings dipped in vinegar since he was a child? [Shocked] And they are pure Chinese dumplings. His black mother hand-made the dumplings with soy sauce filling. This is too outrageous. [Shocked] Won't you read it after you finish writing it with AI? Author? Don't you think it's strange? Is it very inconsistent?
It's a well-written AI article. It's okay in the early and mid-term. I still need to revise it. The chapter I'm reading now has not been revised. The commentator shouted, this is super agility. In the last few minutes of the Western Conference Finals, I was behind by more than ten points, but I passed the ball to the protagonist because the protagonist's mission was one point short. And I found that many AI articles will show water stains when I stay in a hotel before joining the team. I have read several AI articles that are like this.
Overall, it's good, but the details are a little bit conflicting. When I write about Zhan at full strength, I write about shooting 61 which is okay. Then in the later chapters, the nerve knife deducts the shooting score, and then directly deducts it to 63. You just call it a water dispenser level... 😂 I heard that there is something wrong when I heard it, and there are no chapter comments.
The aunt keeps bringing milk tea, the coach keeps praising her secretly, the brothers keep being surprised, the system keeps secretly recording it... Just like the master who closely follows the school beauty, the same template is used, but the medicine is not changed.
It's quite good. In fact, I listened to the book to pass the time and read it without thinking. There is nothing wrong with the overall direction. But when I listened to the book, I felt that some words appeared repeatedly. Just like when Durant hit a two-pointer at the beginning of the game against the Suns, it appeared repeatedly. In the first and second games against the Suns, this description was repeated. Then there is this Mexican aunt. She appears too frequently. It is really boring to watch too much. But the overall plot framework, this counterattack and killing from the bottom, is really attractive. It is just that some places feel a bit watery, which may be a common problem of system writing. The score of this book is a bit low, maybe due to these reasons. I feel it should be 7.5-8 Points.
The pace is slower, and there are more life and conversations. It is a real loser. I slowly exercise and then type up a good book, and see the updates in one breath. Although there are occasional repetitions of sentence patterns, the shortcomings do not hide the advantages, and it is still worth reading. I look forward to the day when the protagonist succeeds and gets a big contract for his good friends. We have worked together for so long and deserve to be taken care of.
Evaluate it, if you look at the previous dozens of pictures, you will find a large number of repeated skill card effects, a large number of the same similar plots, and a Mexican aunt. This is just a passerby. Why do you mention it so many times? And the content is ridiculous, so why do you mention that black guy a lot? Speechless and a waste of time