Using the Qing dynasty as a mirror and unofficial history as a blade to uncover the Shura field of human nature beneath the surface of "preserving natural principles and destroying human desires" - this creative ambition is already half-literary in itself. Your delineation of Huidong's "praising emotions and coherence" and the "picking and cutting" of "Qing Bailei Chao" constitute a wonderful philosophical contrast: on the one hand, it is the tenderness of sinologists, and on the other hand, it is the blood of the market. The perspective of the Cao sisters is particularly accurate. The distance between the boudoir and the world is the two thinnest cracks in the iron curtain of ethics. Huidong's four words "promoting emotion and sex" are used as the basis of the whole book - when ethics puts "emotion" on the pillar of shame, people can only complete the absurd return of "matching sex" in distortion.
