An NPC in a Matriarchal World Won't Get Pestered

At least up to the 20th chapter of this book, it is still very well written and explains the basic world view. The protagonist has goals and pressure as a mechanism to push things forward. Although it cannot be said that this book is a group portrait article, after all, the definition of a group portrait article is still too strict, but the overall psychological activities of the main supporting characters who work around the protagonist are still reasonable. At present, we look at the rebirth of everyone as the main driving force of the plot, and the goal that the protagonist wants to achieve. Compared with what this current case has revealed, it can also be said that the author's writing skills are relatively solid. Moreover, there is actually a lot to say about the system. Generally speaking, it is divided into two categories: one is a more mechanical system, and the other is a more entertainment system. Of course, the best ones are those that should be serious and those that should be entertainment. However, this degree is not only difficult for small authors to grasp, but even for very powerful authors, sometimes the grasp is not accurate. For example, let's take Yuan Tong's Embers of the Deep and his new book: Hotel Alien. There is a supporting character in Deep Sea who is more entertaining, but he happens to grasp the balance between entertainment and seriousness very well in that book, and his new book is There is a similar supporting role in the film, but the overall perception is that it not only fails to incorporate factors that entertain people when it is too serious, but also prevents the protagonist from promoting the plot in disguise, making people's perception decline. So I think the author's choice of a mechanical system cannot be considered completely correct, but at least it is quite good. It can be regarded as a self-awareness of oneself, which is much better than some people who do not know that they have shortcomings in writing characters, but still insist on writing a more entertainment-oriented system. Of course, we cannot say that this book is without shortcomings. The worldview is not very rigorous. Not every character appearing in the book has his or her own personality and goals. Sometimes, characters are flat or in line with people's inertia. And sometimes some classic plots with supporting characters that serve as the driving force of the plot are obviously just borrowing the writing style of the great masters from more than ten years ago. This can be considered a flaw. That's all I can see at the moment, but overall, even at the starting point, I can give a 6.5 To 7.5 For the first 20 chapters. Overall, they are considered a small masterpiece. If I can keep writing and the ending is not too bad, I might be able to give a 7 to 8. This score should be a little difficult to reach Wanding from the starting point, but Wanding is still very simple. Of course, what the Qidian audience is willing to watch may not be the same as Tomato. The Qidian audience may not be as tolerant of heroines and systems as Tomato. If there are slight changes, Qidian may also achieve good results.

The writing is good, the plot is good, the male protagonist is unstoppable, and it surpasses most female protagonists. It has no shortcomings except that there are too few updates.