Secular**

I respect every reader who likes my works, but I will never cater to them. I personally think this is the quality that creators need most, and it is also what I pursue most. For me, I think it's not the plot that's cliche. The plot can be the same, but I think the effect is very different. It's not an old cliché, and I won't rely on golden fingers. A clichéd plot is always that, and an unconventional plot, to me, is the blending of elements into one thing, even though it's a small thing. Each character has their own story, it's not "I once harmed people, and then I want to be a detective, and there will be more people." It's not "My family is opposed to me becoming a forensic doctor, but I insist on it." I think the character should not be like this. Just like in reality, no one would make a big decision casually. There is a cause and effect. This is what I think the suspense novel wants to express. Regarding the perfect crime, I have never agreed that it can only be completed by a "high IQ". It always relies on the strength drawn by people in the dark, just like "if a fool wants to kill someone, then he is no longer a fool." I think the top one is a kind of "conspiracy"_you know, but you just can't help it The reason why I write is very complicated, but it is never derived from PUA of data and traffic. I will continue to polish the characters and make the characters in the group less one-sided. In fact, I personally feel that the current characters are not very three-dimensional, because considering various reasons, they have not been polished yet. For some questions, I can only say that I am looking for details in the details. These contents are not curious, but as I said in the introduction, this is a kind of "wildness" If you can't express it in life, express it in novels This is a sense of powerlessness against reality and a protest against the falsehood that people now live in. Just like the protagonist In short, A good character requires the creator to carefully understand and polish it, put into the state of each character at that time, and feel their feelings in different environments. A complex character requires readers to carefully understand why this character does what he does every time. A good character is worthy of every reader's careful exploration. I don't know what will happen in the later stage, but I feel that the purpose of my writing is never so easy to summarize. Since I say this, I hope I can do it as well. :) Hey, hey, wait, wait, what I want to add is, don't rush to question after reading my case, the excitement is yet to come. I don't want to disappoint the readers because I came here to "counter-routine", so I will avoid all normal ideas. Of course, I will not impose it, nor am I brainless, but I can do something unexpected. Or maybe you think of the ending but not the process, and you think of the process but not the result. Of course, specific feedback from each reader is needed. I will read it carefully without objection, and will also respond seriously. This is my attitude. But I won't cater, it's my style. In fact, I really want to say something at the end. I understand that most suspense readers "understand everything", so we can know what each other wants to express without actually communicating. This is what I think is the most real and interesting interaction between every reader and author. I think the author should never rely on preaching to readers how to think, nor should they appear to be superior. The author is the same as the reader. When the author reads and thinks, he is the reader. When readers think about what the author wants to express and the plot of the story, the reader is the author. Everyone has their own ideas, and there are many different authors. ——I am an author, but I am not a person. I have readers, and the readers are the authors. We are all authors. In a sense, I am not a person. I am my own reader. Readers have their own world and ideas. The author should not force readers to think, but guide them. Everyone has their own experience, and their ideas change with experience and are ever-changing. Therefore, I think the author should not be condescending, nor should he elevate any readers. This is the truest meaning, and it is also the reason why I do not like to preach or preach. Preaching is useless, just like parents forcing their children to learn. Regarding the rating award category, I initially tried asking readers to rate it, and I also gave it a few gifts, but in the end my result was: good works can withstand recognition and thinking by readers themselves, rather than my personal creative ideas. This is what I discovered later. I think that if readers really like it, there is no need for the author to say too much, just like I like "White Night Walk". Regarding tipping, I think this is a kind of affirmation, because I think, if we are all equal people, the tip you give me is like a red envelope, some kind of red envelope given by ordinary people to ordinary people, right? So whether it is more or less, I don't think it matters. This is the reader's affirmation of me. Therefore, I don't think I am a "suspense writer" because I think writers/authors and readers are on the same level, and no one is superior to the other. In my world, receiving affirmation and praise is my sobriety and further confidence and recognition of writing. I will treat criticism and feedback, but I will not modify it at will or blindly obey it. Only at a certain moment will I feel that I am a true "suspense lover". I will modify the logic, because I think if it is considered a "perfect crime", there are logical loopholes, and true perfection should be carefully polished. Finally, what I think I can be absolutely confident about about the work is that what you think and see is what I want you to discover and see. It's really hard to guess if you don't see the ending. Part 3 (3.21) Regarding the term and method of "perfect crime", I know that there are actually many loopholes in what I wrote, such as the lethal dose and onset time of acetaminophen, as well as the motivations of the characters, such as why Teacher Huang "precisely inserted between the fourth and fifth ribs." These may be found in the details, or the protagonist's thoughts may resonate, but these are not enough to find a reasonable motive. It is not about dying for the sake of dying. I think it is more about guilt. Regarding these loopholes, I think they need to be corrected. I will not avoid these loopholes. Just like the characters are not so three-dimensional, a good work cannot be immersed in the satisfying illusion of self-goodness and perfect crime. These are called "black vitality", and I think that is the case. Rather than fictional hearts and characters, there are more words that cannot be said in life. The author does not have to be authoritative, because the author's popularity depends entirely on readers. No matter how good a work is, no one will read it. This is also my personal view of the essence. Perfect character design is what the current platform needs, but how long can the character design last? Creators are never perfect. I always believe that a good creator never relies on good works, but on being a person who dares to face shortcomings. As usual, I often go to AI to find loopholes, even though I don't want to see it So, this is my expression of "identity". Of course I want my work to be seen, and I also want to be listed - what is there to say? That's what human desires are, it doesn't mean you don't have them if you don't admit them. I know I have it, so why not face it? And why don't you admit it and just keep deceiving yourself and others? I admit my ambition, but my original intention will not change. I have never done it to be on the list. According to my words, it is to "be seen by more people" This is also mentioned in the book, so I don't understand what "personality" is, just like "a good person has done bad things throughout his life, is he a good person or a bad person?" People often cannot stay rational when they are angry, and people will be exposed at that time, but everyone pretends to be in a bad mood, which I will also talk about. Expressing with true emotions is far better than false lyrics. This is one of the reasons why I speak informally. Part 4 Regarding the first three chapters and the hook at the end, someone must have said: "Real emotions are often bland narratives, fragmented, and without strong conflicts." I want to say this first: Although I am a person of low status, I am not a fool. I have also mentioned issues related to traffic before. I have studied algorithms, and this is also related to the issue of "the dissemination of works." The key is that the writing method is like this. It is not a simple narrative, but the deeper thoughts of the protagonist. I more or less understand the need for a hook at the end, but I don't leave a hook just for the sake of a hook. It also contains the feeling that I hope readers will feel when reading the next chapter, or to be seen in the same way as above. This is also a method to make myself feel real and to make readers empathize. The two are never the same. (See comments for more) To write a book review, you can write three chapters of a novel [shocked]🔚

This novel gave me a lot of surprises, Campus Criminal Investigation, I Ching Bagua,. It's hard to imagine what kind of state the author was in when he wrote it. This criminal investigation case is probably going to be burned out by wildfire and revived by the spring breeze. The plot is quite interesting. When I read a certain chapter, I suddenly remembered a sentence: "If you accept ten thousand bells without arguing about etiquette and righteousness, how can ten thousand bells help me?" Maybe it's because of different opinions. I don't think human nature is inherently evil, but I don't think human nature is inherently good either. I think there is no standard answer to what life is like. Some people yearn for "ten thousand lights on the road ahead", while others love "a round moon in my hometown" If you are sitting on a bench in the park and see the sun shining on you through the gaps in the leaves, you raise your hand to catch it to feel the breath of nature. But if you raise your hand to cover yourself when the sun is shining on you on the road, you are raising your hand to cover yourself from the sun, not to see how bright it is or whether it will burn your hands. You have a strong desire to share. People who like you will think you are documenting your life, while people who don't like you will think you want to talk about even the most trivial things. But there is nothing sinful about you. Flowers are beautiful in their own way, and people comment on them. From the first chapter to the present, the author has actually surpassed most creators in keeping updated. Instead of discussing "what's the point?" Think about what you want to do now. Time will pass, flowers will wither, the seasons will change, and people will grow old. The place you want to go will not always be waiting for you, but the choice is yours whether to go or not. You can act badly, you can take action, or you can wait. As long as you think it is right, as long as you are willing, these choices are guiltless.

Volume 1: The ultimate game between two madmen, Xu Silin's hands are always clean The plot is very novel, there are no cheats, only extreme predictions and precautions that only madmen can understand.