Sprout from the Rotting Soil

There is no such thing as writing a group portrait that seems to have no protagonist at all, but it also depends on the author's writing ability. Obviously, if you want to write a group portrait in this kind of apocalypse, you need to develop several lines at the same time. Otherwise, it will make people look very confused. For example, this gentleman inexplicably knows so many things and does not explain the background. How can you I am afraid that I will have to go a little further to explain something, and it is completely unreasonable to be able to pull up a team of thousands of people casually. At the same time, when Barton arrived in the main city, he did not plan to run away at any time. He had no supplies, weapons, and manpower and just hung around in the main city for so many days just like playing house. It was simply force-feeding history. There is really a reason why he couldn't become popular.

After reading about ten chapters, the descriptions of the protagonist's mother and Amy are pretty good, but why do they suddenly lose their wits as soon as they get to the NPC? The knight went to investigate and didn't report anything he encountered and concealed it? Because of being bitten? The doctor discovered that the knight mutated and cannibalized, and the child who was eaten stood up again, and actually wanted to take poison and feed it all over his body. I think it is reasonable for the doctor to escape. There is no logical thinking at all. I only write about the psychological activities and behavioral logic of the protagonist and supporting characters. The rest is about the NPCs. Don't you feel weird when you write it? You don't think about it.

From what I've seen, it's actually pretty good in every aspect, but the psychological grasp of the characters isn't quite there, and a few details are poorly handled. Character psychology is really important to novels.

Just look at the title of the book and you will know that it is very typical of classical literature. The writing is good, and the plot of the story is well-written, but it's a pity that there are too many supporting characters besides the protagonist, both in terms of story and psychological description. It feels like there is no outline. I just write whatever comes to my mind. There is no popular system or time travel and rebirth. It is not exciting. It is not a harem type and is too documentary. Maybe because it is a Western fantasy, the writing style is too similar to the classical novels that I have read in the past such as foreign masterpieces, which is a bit confusing. For the time being, I can't tell what kind of story or world the author wants to tell readers, Gao Wu? Magic? A budding scientific machine? Or is it the struggle history of a small person? To put it more pungently, it feels a bit like the literary youths in the past who moaned for no reason and forced themselves to express their sorrow for writing new words. There are no metaphors or anything like that, just the kind of documentary novels that became popular in the 2000s. But it happens to be a Western fantasy, a foreign plot.

It is a truly desperate way to survive among zombies in the Middle Ages. There is no golden finger. A group of people support each other on the way to survive. The tense rhythm makes people breathless. In the postgraduate examination of human nature in the face of despair, everyone will hand in a different answer sheet.

The main character is a blacksmith. I thought the main character was a noble, so much was written about it. However, the writing style is still good, but I personally feel that it misses the point. . . . If everyone is the protagonist, it is a group portrait novel

🥰 Good-looking

The writing is good, hurry up and update it, the progress is not good 🤔🤔

It seemed average at first, but then I saw that the protagonists were so miserable 🤦

I think the writing is very real, why isn't it popular?