Let Technological Civilization Feel the Shock of Superman

This book is of very high quality and many places are written in great detail. But the protagonist is portrayed very well. I don't know if he can handle it later. I still want to say something about the plot: If an idealist cannot create his ideal heaven, then he will most likely create his ideal hell.

The first ten chapters are sometimes really poisonous and sometimes frustrating, but the last ten chapters are so beautiful that I finally let go.

People who like it will like it very much. It satisfies my fantasy about getting superman's power. There are also many people who don't like it. Some people will think that this superman's approach has many childish behaviors and give a bad evaluation, but many science fiction technologies in it are really well written.

This book completely describes the arrogance of an ordinary high school student after gaining power and his previous narrow understanding of society. It feels good, but everyone is used to seeing the intelligence of the protagonist in other books. In this book, you will think that the protagonist is mentally retarded, but in fact, the protagonist is written like a real person.

Although there are too many things taken for granted and too many details missing. However, most people really cannot write in detail about such a huge topic. But the idea is indeed worthy of this theme The underground people are too poisonous. I feel ready to treat the underground people as slave miners when there is no grievance or hatred. Is this the character value you have established in the past? It was too ridiculous later on, and the process of destroying the sun and the United States started again. The excuses were too deliberate. The templated United States and Japan went crazy, and then the protagonist was righteously exterminated. I always felt that the next step should be to destroy Europe. This is too routine

The author writes very well, and has written a lot of issues that I have thought about. Because human nature is complex, we cannot stop fighting, and we can only rely on personal absolute force to restrain the world. There is a lot that can be written, but not more. Although many comments say that the protagonist is the Virgin, compared to the two extremes of the original Superman who has a no-kill principle and the wanton behavior of not eating beef, How do you think about the idealism of superhuman beings who lead mankind around the world to leap into space? The overall effect is what I have always believed in. On this planet that hosts billions of humans and trillions of life cycles, they are just tiny dust particles in the vast universe. When will mankind be able to get rid of the never-ending disputes and move towards a larger world and future? It may take decades or hundreds of years, or it may never happen, because there will be human nature when there are people. Human nature always has good and bad qualities. Where there are people, there will be a world. Moreover, this book explains a truth very well: the bricks fly with great force.

This is the second book of this kind that I have found after I Am Superman. I like this kind of novel where I am transcendent and lead mankind to climb the technological tree and go to the starry sky. The protagonist can not only use extraordinary power to suppress all disharmonious factors in the ethnic group, let human beings use their power in one place, but also provide guidance for the development of human beings in the universe. Cool!

Actually, the idea is good, but the writing and plot can't support it.

It is in line with the process of a person suddenly becoming an ancestor. After unifying the world, the writing is very good. I look forward to the follow-up.

A good book, a really good book that is very serious about tomatoes. There are very few such simple books on the market now. If other movies incorporate too many elements, the pace may be slowed down, or the plot may be confusing. The main line is clear, which is to use the power of Superman. It helps human science and technology advance to the star sea, and then also discusses several important social issues, distribution and ideological problems that Utopia must face.

The quality of the book is quite high. Some people in the book say that Superman is guilty of arrogance. If he thinks so, is it necessarily correct? This is how I understand it: Justice is originally created by humans and is used to judge humans themselves, because it cannot be used to say that it is right for humans to slaughter those pigs, dogs, cattle and sheep. This is a matter of different standpoints and a matter of survival. However, it is not easy to judge whether it is right in human power itself. Various wars, contradictions, conflicts... It is simply not easy to define what is right or wrong. So after Superman comes out, will it bring benefits to all mankind, and will it help them go to the sea of ​​stars? Is killing troops better to stop the war? So in general, I think it is correct from the perspective of human beings. Even if it is wrong, it can be ignored. After all, the protagonist is no longer human.

Why are there so many low stars in the comment area? Is it intentional low star protection or something? It looks really good to me. I feel that the flaws are not concealed. It satisfies my basic fantasy of not eating beef, but the main character has a higher goal and is not the kind of superman who becomes super when he is happy. You can see my reading time and my book list. I really feel good about it.

I think it's well written, so I'll give it 5 stars. It was Superman who conquered the earth and then conquered aliens. Then he took the earth to rule the solar system. Any stories of expansion beyond the solar system? [Laughing and crying] [Laughing and crying] Some scenes are quite shocking.

The article is interesting, and reading the comments is even more interesting. I feel so anxious, and the curses are so dirty. Do you want me to say that Spider-Man doesn't do this too? Do you expect a person who is bullied every day to be omniscient and omnipotent? Another suggestion: if you want to truly guide all mankind, you should arrange to learn more knowledge and stop fooling around. Basic physics? High energy physics? Social psychology? Be more precise. Will make additional comments later

The writing is quite good, and so far, everything about the character creation of the protagonist is very reasonable.

If superpowers can control thoughts and control other people's lives, then the unity of all blue hearts will not be a problem

I can't spray this one, I really like this one. . . I was a little curious if the author is a related enthusiast, so I used AI to check some information. I feel that most of the technical details are pretty much the same. I feel like I have learned something about the skyhook system and the overview effect.

I don't know why it's only 5.5, But I give it ten stars! After reading the first twenty chapters, I still want to read more. I give eight stars after chapter 20. It's not good anymore. It's nonsense, and the boring plot is coming. After reading the fifty-sixth chapter, I lost interest in reading the rest of it.

Very well written It fits the definition of science fiction, science fiction, technology, starry sky, development, happiness and exploration.

9 Points or above. I have read about ten or twenty chapters so far. To be honest, I have thought about this idea before, but I have not put it into practice. I personally think this subject is very interesting and meaningful. I think this is what Shuangwen should be, both interesting and meaningful. It's too childish. I personally think this kind of subject matter is easy to write, but at the same time it is difficult to write because it is actually a hard science fiction. You need to keep thinking about what kind of changes his power will cause. Hard science fiction is particularly difficult to write, and the more settings there are, the harder it becomes to write. Just like Liu Cixin, the science fiction he writes is basically hard science fiction. But it can be said that the settings he wrote are almost very few. Just like in the chaotic butterfly, one nail destroys a country. He only wrote nail-like settings, very small. But the changes made are significant and dramatic. This is a kind of understanding of personal abilities, which can also be regarded as a kind of restraint. And most of the techniques he uses are blank and blurry. That is to say, don't write if you can, because it's not easy to write. Let's take the Chaos Butterfly as an example, a weather weapon that can change the world. Let's take the Chaos Butterfly as an example. The meteorological weapon that could change the world was finally destroyed in an unknown corner. As for what impact it would have, what impact could it have? Liu Cixin did not write these. There is also a mirror, which allows you to see everything from ancient times to the present through this quantum computer. Liu Cixin also did not describe the social changes caused by this mirror in this story, and the history in the middle was almost blank. All that is left is an almost allegorical ending. The Three-Body Problem is the science fiction that he has written the most and performed to the highest degree. But you see, his description of this future world is actually very little. But compared to his other works, it can be considered too much. There is another author who is an online writer. He also enjoys writing hard science fiction. Xiaoyu Qingchen may not be as famous as Liu Cixin, but I particularly like to read his novels. Although it is basically unfinished, the feeling of using one setting to interpret countless flowers is the charm of hard science fiction. So this is why I say that hard science fiction is difficult to write, it requires knowledge and insight. It needs to squeeze people's IQ and imagination. So that's why I say hard science fiction is difficult to write. It requires knowledge and insight. It needs to squeeze people's IQ and imagination. The same is true in reality. A small creation may change the world. For more novels, their world is fixed, because they focus more on telling a story, a complete story, so the world view must be fixed. The charm of hard science fiction is that it does not tell stories, the interpretation of the world itself is its story. Therefore, when Liu Cixin writes about Cheng Xin and some specific characters, in fact, in my opinion, it is the failure or poisonous point of Three-Body Problem. No matter what, it cannot be regarded as its highlight. Why do you give this novel 4 stars? Let's encourage writers who write science fiction novels. I can rank it at 7 points in my heart. I can read it, but it's really a bit novice to me.

It's quite nice to write it according to this framework. It will first unify the world and then develop into the stars, and the pace is relatively fast. I will feel better if I can connect to other dimensional universes later. Then I hope to develop a cultivation system, such as the cultivation system that swallows the stars, from martial arts to the universe. Otherwise, if it continues to develop, the earth will always live and work in peace and contentment and be protected.

It started out quite innocently, and it was all fantasy, but people have to have dreams, right? The writing got better and better later on.

The price is right, the car is easy to jam, the express delivery is mobile, it is going to rain, oh, let's go to Eurasian College, oh, wash it, oh, oh, oh, think, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, boots, classmate, oh, systematic

It's very good to go up and let me enjoy Superman. How can I imagine it now?

It's not bad. I just finished reading it now. I hope the author will update it quickly and keep up the good work so that I can continue to watch the plot that promotes the development of the world in the future.

If you like to watch weaklings, you can watch it

The first thing to do to gain the ability is to punch through the earth

Much stronger than those who gain abilities and become citizens of the motherland or who are only satisfied with being street heroes.

Many people were put off by some of the bad points at the front, but the back part is quite beautiful. It's no longer just the protagonist's solo show.

It's much better than the decisive one. Finally, he is an author with normal views.