Designing a Copy of Weird Tales: I Designed a Chinese Wine Bureau

I watched the first Hongmen Banquet. Although it still felt a bit rushed, I could feel that the author was really serious about writing, and many details were carefully polished. The subsequent writing is getting better and better. Come on, author! By the way, Rouse, is there a female protagonist in the novel? I find it difficult to write this kind of emotional line.

The novel is very well-written. The male protagonist is not a good guy or a bad guy. He just focuses on survival. He integrates all his darkness and pressure into the dungeon to harvest human lives. It is bloody and oppressive. It is quite refreshing to be the protagonist. Don't talk about three views, there are no three views. Please enter with caution.

The dungeon was hell, it was so painful. Sun Yu and Fang Hao were pretty good, and I was very impressed [like]. The way the protagonist broke through the defense in the first dungeon was very interesting, and the cute feeling was very real!

Very well, both the plot and the protagonist are very real, but why add a character who is conceited and easily affected by emotions?

After reading the first book, I feel that the character's personality charm even exceeds that of the protagonist, especially Sun Jian, who is so conspicuous that I even wonder if the author will not follow the conventional path and introduce a new way for the protagonist to appear [face covering]

Full marks for creativity. After reading the first copy, I couldn't help but comment and encourage it. Hahahaha. Although I felt like I was trying to complete the logical chain in the middle, the introduction of the content is refreshing. It won't work after that. Let's go to the school part. First of all, I'm very grateful. I don't know if the author read the Hengshui High School theme I wrote in my message. I was about to give up reading at Chapter 110. The next two copies are not as amazing as the first copy because the world view is not big, so my expectations are not very high. I just hope that it will not collapse and that there will be surprises and ups and downs like the first copy. The rules are not weird enough and the pain is evenly distributed. Some character descriptions are too equal, which is a bad thing. There are no explosive points and no pressure points. There is a copycat from the starting point called God's Imitation Crime, which also starts from the perspective of game design. I hope the teacher can look at similar works, movies and comics, and optimize them with Chinese horror. It's still a pity. Leave a comment.

The writing is very good, but I don't understand why the score is so low? Maybe the protagonist's copy is too real and immersive, which makes people feel uncomfortable. The challengers are not idiots, they are all trying to survive, unlike the challengers in other stories who are all mentally retarded. Moreover, the writing style is really normal. There are no close-ups of the faces and bodies of the protagonist and supporting characters. Who knows the sense of redemption in this novel?

Great subject matter, but not my cup of tea. Five stars for support.

[Shocked] It's very creative. A lot of them are writing about Chinese horror. This is the first time I've seen this disgusting wine table culture.

The so-called Chinese education kills individuality. What is individuality? In view of public order and good customs, students should behave like students and study hard. They should take what the teacher teaches seriously. They are afraid that they will not be admitted to high school. They have no regrets in life. That is not to let their children read early by machine. If you think that Chinese education kills individuality, I think you are more of a person who must be very yearning for the Republic of China. You must be the kind of person who secretly envies the romance of the Republic of China. Not only can you not study, but you can also burn, kill and loot. You are particularly individual.

Let me tell you, there may be a lot of ambiguity, because this book does not have pure heroes and villains, and the protagonist's behavior may not be very likable. The designer camp and the challenger camp are opposite. Both sides have their own positions. If you stand in one camp, then the opposite side is the villain. They all want to live and are affected by the rules of the tower.

I have finished reading all the chapters so far, and I feel very happy about it, but the updates are very slow and I can't read enough. I've seen other book friends talk about the protagonist's mentality problem, and I think it's totally fine. I'm in so much pain, why can't I let others bear it too? The rain that I have been exposed to is also common to others. The author also said that the protagonist is not a good person. I personally also like such a protagonist (eye movement), and reading novels is just for fun. There is no need to be so serious. Then I think the author can let the protagonist relax a little in the follow-up. I feel that the protagonist is too tight (?), And too many updates are not enough to keep my eyes open😭😭😭

With the current writing style, it will be at least nine points higher. The controversy is still about the values ​​​​of the novel. Positive and inspiring novels have a wider audience. It's really well written. The author doesn't want to give up. I want to see the ending of the villain and protagonist.

[Understood] After carefully reading the two copies, I found that there is a lack of underlying logic. The rules of the first copy are orderly, and the core rule is that the challenger is the grandson. The settings are pretty good The second copy lacks a lot of underlying logic, but let's talk about it, its core rule is to let the challenger be a bully. As for why the challenger must be a cow or horse, I don't know. The author didn't say, If the second copy is replaced by a pyramid scheme, the telecom fraud den will be even more perfect.

Current progress Chapter 70√ I rarely see this kind of villain protagonist, and he is very pathetic. He was oppressed and became a villain, and his psychology is a bit distorted. Maybe it's because I read less books) In the books I read before, the protagonist's designs were all smooth sailing, and the enemies were all stupid. In this book, the protagonist's enemies in every game are very clever, which is quite interesting.

It comprehensively elaborates on Chinese horror, showing the character of the protagonist, the human nature among the contestants, and the danger and cruelty of society.

Except that it is expanded by AI, the plot is quite interesting [Adoration]

Great rules weird talk, but you need to start reading it from the third copy. Of course, I read it from the first copy. The author has indeed grown. One last thing to say, remember to update 20 times a day. Finally, I hope that after each dungeon ends, I can explain the clearance method and necessary conditions for this dungeon. The dungeon must not be fatal. This also satisfies the requirements of some readers.

It still feels a bit strange that they are all fatal situations. It would be nice if the setting had a pass rate. After all, there are many ways to kill everyone.

Oops, it's been a few days and there's still no follow-up to that article. Thinking about the wonderful part of the story, it was like the sound of the string breaking, and it stopped suddenly, which was really disturbing. I toss and turn every night because I read your words. Could it be that you have forgotten us readers and left us alone to struggle in this literary wasteland? I hope you will take pity on my obsession and update it soon, so as not to disappoint our high expectations.

It feels okay, it's pretty good-looking, why do some people call it shit? Then I asked those people who still couldn't say what they said, 👀Are they malicious ratings? Aren't we from the perspective of that game designer? Don't you just want the protagonist to win? Why do so many people want the challenger to win?

I am a student, so I can't write any good words, but I think this book is really good-looking, and everyone is currently commenting on this book in the early stages. I may see your opinions in the future. This is one of the best reasons why I like this book, although I have not chosen it [smile]

After reading it so far, I still feel that it is in line with my heart. Ten thousand people have ten thousand Hamlets. It is difficult to agree with everyone. It is best to agree with your own heart.

The meaning and content of each copy of the ordeal is quite broad, so it needs a longer length, just like a movie, which takes a long time and needs to be savored. But just like the difference between movies and TV series, the novel's chapter-by-chapter update is more similar to the format of a TV series. The plot needs to be designed with appropriate ups and downs and interspersed with slow narration, otherwise the update every day will always feel like being out of the drama. This is just my opinion, I hope the author can forgive me.

The logic is rigorous, the thoughts are delicate, the language is fluent, and the characters are perfectly portrayed. You are not a simple author! ! ! You have a fatal flaw in this book. You make this mistake in almost every chapter, since you want to write about such topics as "logic" and "rules"! Basically every author will encounter this red line, which is the order of "rules"; and the inconsistency of "rules"; point! You are very good! Come on! ! ! …

It's particularly good-looking, and it suits my bookish appetite. Other horror dramas are boring after just a few copies, but this one is Chinese horror that we can all detect in our daily lives. I've watched it a lot, and I hope there will be a sequel. The various relationship chains and writing techniques in it are very clever. If you like micro-horror, you must give it a try [Send Heart]

I think let me taste it first I have fallen

You can design some plots where the protagonist fails, but you can't always let the protagonist win. This way readers can know the result at a glance. Let the protagonist fail, fail. Come on!

The first copy, 5 stars in the Hongmen Banquet session Second copy, average, 3 stars The third copy, Chapter 61 Poisoning, 1 star, Checked again and it was still done. If I don't accept refutation, will readers look unhappy with me? Sorry, I never read the replies.

Cai Cai's writing is good. It's the third time I've had such a thin and healthy rule. It's weird⌓‿⌓(Let's change the emoji.