[No CP+Group portraits+Egoism (other words for your own people)+Millions of people]
Ji Huai was originally a tepid Doujia game anchor. His father didn't care for him, his mother didn't love him, and even his adopted son Ji Lanyu was able to take advantage of him.
One day when he was reviewing a sea survival game, he was accidentally pulled into the game and became the only beta player.
———
Because Ji Lanyu is in the top ten of the game list, his feud with Ji Huai is well known to everyone.
Just when everyone was watching the show, thinking that the loser must be Ji Huai, he broke Ji Lanyu's neck with his backhand, and said in a good mood: "Sorry, I am number one on the list."
Zhang Qilin: "Yes, number one on the list."
Other members: "Pretending..."
Reader comments
Seeing the so-called brother, I am skeptical of the definition of my own people in this book.
Is their relationship good or bad? You should know that the relationship between the protagonist and his family is very bad, but he insists on taking the protagonist home without any discussion. I feel that he doesn't regard the protagonist as a human being, and is more like a thug hired by the protagonist's family. Can anyone tell me that this is the case with my brother?
So does he know that it is the protagonist's adopted son who has been persecuting the protagonist. He not only stole the protagonist's parents, but also found someone to bully the protagonist at school. After the protagonist did a live broadcast of the game, he even gave the director a bunch of dirty information. The protagonist's father's company was used, and all kinds of clarifications were removed from the shelves.
In this case, the protagonist's "good brother" wants to bring the protagonist back to attend the coming-of-age ceremony of the adopted son. The protagonist himself said that no one cared about him when he became an adult. This so-called good brother said that there was nothing he could do and the other party gave too much. If this sentence were to be used elsewhere, I would find it funny, but here I just feel terrible.
Even if he doesn't know the details, he should know roughly, this so-called brother, but he gives me the feeling that it doesn't matter what the protagonist thinks, he is like the human trafficker, the protagonist is just a commodity to him, and the other party gives the money, and he only needs to kidnap the person back.
Even so, the protagonist still regards him as a good brother. As soon as he officially entered the game, he formed an alliance with this good brother and met him immediately.
There is no sense of defense. When the protagonist asked the system those questions earlier, I thought he was quite cautious. Oh, I understand, the co-author is one of my own, right? It's my fault that I didn't realize this meaning when I read the introduction.
Maybe I read a lot of survival novels. Even the protagonist who helps his brother-in-law seems to be talking about everything, but in fact he is secretly guarding against it. It is okay to form an alliance, but not to meet easily. Although she has been resolutely denying herself mentally, she is still very powerful in action.
Seeing the so-called brother, I am skeptical of the definition of my own people in this book. Is their relationship good or bad? You should know that the relationship between the protagonist and his family is very bad, but he insists on taking the protagonist home without any discussion. I feel that he doesn't regard the protagonist as a human being, and is more like a thug hired by the protagonist's family. Can anyone tell me that this is the case with my brother? So does he know that it is the protagonist's adopted son who has been persecuting the protagonist. He not only stole the protagonist's parents, but also found someone to bully the protagonist at school. After the protagonist did a live broadcast of the game, he even gave the director a bunch of dirty information. The protagonist's father's company was used, and all kinds of clarifications were removed from the shelves. In this case, the protagonist's "good brother" wants to bring the protagonist back to attend the coming-of-age ceremony of the adopted son. The protagonist himself said that no one cared about him when he became an adult. This so-called good brother said that there was nothing he could do and the other party gave too much. If this sentence were to be used elsewhere, I would find it funny, but here I just feel terrible. Even if he doesn't know the details, he should know roughly, this so-called brother, but he gives me the feeling that it doesn't matter what the protagonist thinks, he is like the human trafficker, the protagonist is just a commodity to him, and the other party gives the money, and he only needs to kidnap the person back. Even so, the protagonist still regards him as a good brother. As soon as he officially entered the game, he formed an alliance with this good brother and met him immediately. There is no sense of defense. When the protagonist asked the system those questions earlier, I thought he was quite cautious. Oh, I understand, the co-author is one of my own, right? It's my fault that I didn't realize this meaning when I read the introduction. Maybe I read a lot of survival novels. Even the protagonist who helps his brother-in-law seems to be talking about everything, but in fact he is secretly guarding against it. It is okay to form an alliance, but not to meet easily. Although she has been resolutely denying herself mentally, she is still very powerful in action.
I feel like brothers are not too brothers [smile]