Do Cao Cao's "traitor" and "hero" constitute two sides that are indispensable to the pioneers of an era? In the face of the huge gap between ideal and reality, how did Zhuge Liang persist in his "wisdom" and "sadness" and eventually become a cultural symbol? Liu Bei's "benevolence" and "hypocrisy". Under the rules of survival in troubled times, is morality a means or a burden? How did Sima Yi's "invisibility" and "ruthlessness" use his lifelong dormancy to write a footnote for the ending of the era? This book will break out of the traditional framework of "respecting Liu and demoting Cao" and re-examine these familiar names from a modern perspective and humanistic care. We not only analyze their achievements and strategies, but also focus on their choices, dilemmas, anxiety and loneliness, and explore the human logic and era motivations behind their actions.
Reader comments
There are a lot of characters I haven't seen yet, and I learned a lot from them
The evaluations of many characters are quite good.
It is recommended to use less workplace language and more factual analysis.
I still like Cao Cao's unruly look
The analysis of Zhuge Liang is OK, please support it.
The analysis is okay, Liu Bei's chapter is good
I learned a lot, but it's a bit complicated
Indeed, Wei Yan's Ziwu Valley Strategy simply won't work.
There are a lot of characters I haven't seen yet, and I learned a lot from them
The evaluations of many characters are quite good.
It is recommended to use less workplace language and more factual analysis.
I still like Cao Cao's unruly look
The analysis of Zhuge Liang is OK, please support it.
The analysis is okay, Liu Bei's chapter is good
I learned a lot, but it's a bit complicated
Indeed, Wei Yan's Ziwu Valley Strategy simply won't work.