The general asked, "What did he steal?"
Answer: "Stealing food!"
——This is not greed, but survival.
The general asked: "Whose is this stolen from?"
Answer: "Stealing from Wang Fu's family."
——It's not robbing the common people, it's robbing the rich, without touching the lifeblood of the "poor people".
The general said, "Let him go."
——This is not favoritism, but a breath of approval:
"I was so hungry that I still grabbed it."
This sentence is the best: "I was hungry and anxious, but I still grabbed it."
It's not a law, it's a human word.
The general didn't talk about king's law, he talked about human taste——
He knew that hunger was not a sin, but a sign;
He knows that one less meal for the rich and one more meal for the poor means life.
But you have to be vigilant——
This kind of logic only talks about positions, not rules.
Today, "stealing food" is released, and tomorrow, "killing the rich and giving to the poor" may be released.
What about the day after tomorrow? Who is poor and who is justified, who is rich and who deserves to die?
One sentence summary:
The general's words are the mercy of the world, not the justice of the temple.
Not impressive plot