Fighting False Historical Rumors, Starting from Qin Shihuang

Finally, there is someone who is not mindlessly bragging about the First Emperor and Zhu Yuanzhang.

Clear stream! The emperor is no longer called "ancestor", but is truly affirmed and criticized. It is neither one-sided flattery nor one-sided smear. It is rare. It pays great attention to the true historical scene. It is neither one-sided smear nor flattery for the emperor of the Qing Dynasty. North Korea, compared to others I have met, said that Alexander's Eastern Expedition did not exist, that America belonged to the Chinese, and that the Yin Shang were the first to discover the American continent. It is much better, but if you want to mention the West later, don't fall into the trap of nationalism. Of course, I believe the author will not.

It's okay, but the evaluation of Qin Shihuang is still too kind. If we really evaluate his car, track, book and post road in detail, they were all pioneered by Zhou Gong. It took the Eastern Han Dynasty to complete. Ying Zheng played more of a transitional role and it was Zhou Gongdan's Zhou Li who laid the foundation for China.

People who like the emperors of the Ming and Qing Dynasties are also weird.

Let's take a look. This is a girl who played Qin that I met in the Douyin comment area a few days ago. This girl was very arrogant. She thought I had nothing to offer and posted that piece of information to kill the game. As a result, I took out some historical materials and papers and was dumbfounded for a while, and then started to change the topic boringly. To open up a new track, the discussion is obviously about whether the people's livelihood in the Qin Dynasty was good or not, and whether Qin Shihuang himself was cruel or not. This guy didn't answer directly. She didn't care what I said. She just proved that the Qin Dynasty was good by publishing some historical materials about the poor life of the people in the Han Dynasty [face covering]. I thought that the Qin Dynasty was only a few years old, and natural disasters were not taken into account. She also frequently publishes irrelevant newspapers to prove her claim that the people's livelihood of the Qin Dynasty was good. For example, a piece of a People's Liberation Army newspaper said that the military of the Qin Dynasty was good. She also used it to prove that in terms of people's livelihood, it was wrong [face covering] I couldn't get around it later, so I asked her to answer directly. She said that the laws of the Qin Dynasty were actually very good and could reflect a high level of moral standards [laughing awkwardly] [crying with laughter] I won't tell you how many there are. If you look at the screenshots in the comment area, you don't know how many can be sent.

The writing is relatively objective and does not overly praise or belittle any historical figure.

As for you, you are not like most of Tianmuwen. I only know how to praise you, and that is enough.

I feel like you can write more advanced questions to inspire the ancients. The merits and demerits of many wise kings and saints are sometimes also caused by luck, geographical problems, natural disasters and ice ages. It is necessary to broaden the horizons of the ancients. There are many mistakes at the same time, and it is easy to get worse without a strong enemy to help you make them. For example, the hidden dangers of the Tang Dynasty began when Li Yuan killed the rebels in Hebei. Li Yuan stole the military merits of his relatives and killed Liu Wenjing, which was a king with the talent to subjugate the country. Many people did not criticize the love between children, but because the Tang Dynasty was always prosperous, they ignored local issues. The bombing is a little better than that of the Western Jin Dynasty. After attracting foreign soldiers to help and allow looting, they passed by.

The author writes very objectively. Although there are still many things worthy of discussion, it is a rare masterpiece in the current environment where most people talking about history on the Internet are extreme fans or nationalists. It can be seen that the author has really researched a lot of information in order to write this book. The author's own historical accumulation is also sufficient, and his attitude towards history is also very rational. It is a masterpiece that is rare in a century.

It's pretty good. It's an objective evaluation of history. It's considered a clean stock in Tomato [eating melon]

A good book. The only bad thing is that the author is too civilized and friendly, and can negotiate peacefully with some non-human comments...

I originally wanted to give it four stars. After all, the author did make some historical errors. But seeing a bunch of angry fans in the comment section, they decided to give it five stars.

Where did Afang Palace come from? Wasn't Afang Palace made up by a poet?

The author's writing is also very good. I have also read a lot of such books. They either praise Zhu Yuanzhang or Ying Zheng. It cannot be denied that they did have merits, but their achievements are based on countless bones. If you have merit, you will have your faults.

A rare book in today's environment...! There are minor flaws if you will, but the flaws do not overshadow the good points. Overall, it is worth reading! ! ! Why doesn't the author continue to update? [Cry][Cry][Cry][Cry]

It has a lot of issues but it's not bad. Yang Guang was a coward, a tyrant, and a country-destroying king.

The point of view is correct and the structure is clear. It's just that there are some shortcomings in some places.

A rare work on historical materialism and the people's view of history in the Tomato history section, setting things right from chaos.

Zhu Yong and Zhang Fu are not second generation ancestors. Your statement will make geniuses who are conspiracy theorists angry to death. Zhang Fu had the power of Ping Annan. I forgot about Zhu Yong and didn't know much about it.

The writing is good, and there is no other author's tendency to be unconventional just to attract attention.

Okay, quite objective

Very novel, reasonable and convincing