Sun Liancheng, a time traveler with memories of the entire script of "In the Name of the People", became the famous "lazy" district chief of Guangming District, Handong Province. He is well aware that "the trees that are beautiful in the forest will be destroyed by the wind", and he uses the decadent philosophy of the "District Chief of the Universe" as a perfect disguise, playing the laughing stock of officialdom in full view of the public.
However, beneath the surface, he is using Handong as a chessboard and all living beings as pawns to engage in a shocking "game within a game." Relying on the predicted information gap, he moved key nodes with precision like a ghost: anonymously warning Dafeng Factory, inducing evidence to bring down Chen Qingquan, secretly aiding Hou Liangping, and even influencing the game between Sha Ruijin and Li Dakang. He turned "lazy politics" into a protective color, used astronomical obsession to cover up deep calculations, and used philosophical nonsense to package fatal plans.
Between Qi Tongwei's madness, Zhao Ruilong's greed, Sha Ruijin's iron fist and Yi Xuexue's keen insight, Sun Liancheng is walking on thin ice. His goal is by no means personal power and position, but to correct the trajectory of history with an invisible hand and implant an anti-corruption system gene that transcends the times in Handong officialdom. This is the ultimate adventure that changes history but cannot be discovered by history. It is a dark night legend about a lonely chess player in the depths of the whirlpool of power, risking his life and playing against fate. When the storm ends, who can see clearly what kind of thrilling chess game has been reflected in the eyes of the "lazy official" looking up at the stars?
Reader comments
I don't know why the author made the protagonist so cowardly. Anyway, I think it's a bit illogical.
I read it for a long time, but I didn't understand it. Maybe the author's writing is too profound.
I don't know why the author made the protagonist so cowardly. Anyway, I think it's a bit illogical.
I read it for a long time, but I didn't understand it. Maybe the author's writing is too profound.