
Stats
5.8Score
Synopsis
No synopsis yet.
We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.

We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.
I have read a few chapters, and I feel that the author's writing is quite good, with good writing style and clear organization. I have two personal suggestions. One is whether the language can be used more euphemistically, and the other is that foreign languages and Chinese do not need to be placed in the same place, but can be separated, otherwise it will sometimes affect the perception when reading.
Okay, just use less foreign language
Homely foreign language, we can't understand it anyway [crying]
It looks good, but the update speed is a hundred million points slow. I hope it won't stop updating.
Fourth Reich Ottoman
Good-looking, good-looking, good-looking
Come on, it's very good, but there is no need for foreign languages. Far East should be written as little as possible.
It's still very nice and fulfills my fantasy about Turkey
The writing is okay, it's a cool article on foreign history.
Overall, it's pretty good. It didn't look very good in foreign languages at first, but after the author changed it later, the look became good. Moreover, the subject of Ottoman is indeed novel and worth reading.
Not bad, good, keep up the good work
The author is so awesome
It is among the best foreign literature, and I even suspect that it was written by a foreigner.
It looks great. I loved driving the Ottoman in reverse when I was on the tightrope.
The content is not bad, the subject matter is relatively novel, and the content of Osman is more exciting and has fewer flaws.
Guaguai's book is so beautiful. Why doesn't anyone read it? I used to feel that Osman was a bit of a pity :)