Common Sense Mistakes in Historical Time Travel Articles

Yes, some people can point out the shortcomings of historical time travel writing, but the author's subjective thoughts are relatively strong, and it can be seen that the author's willingness to complain is very strong, which will make the work more or less mixed with the author's selfishness, and some remarks will become extreme. If the author could analyze from a more objective perspective, conduct research on historical data in more detail and completeness, tell an eclectic narrative from multiple aspects, simplify redundant complaints, and avoid loopholes in thinking and blind denial of concepts, I believe this work would be more convincing and of popular science significance. The content inside can be used as a reference, but cannot be relied upon entirely. It is recommended to consult relevant authoritative materials for supplementary reading. Encourage the author's efforts and support the author to continue to create higher quality articles.

Those who write about time travel are okay (after all, time travel is no longer realistic), but the most uncomfortable ones are those that pretend to be historical dramas or plot dramas: The Legend of Nirvana, Ruyi's Royal Love in the Palace, and The Legend of Zhen Huan all treat the audience as blind. . .

There will be errors in the book, but my own thoughts and feelings may not necessarily be correct.

The evaluation of ancient times is quite objective, and this article finally denies the novels such as the Historical Sky Curtain Ryu that I can't stand. Also, good historical fiction is hard to find. In this book "The Rise of the Ming Dynasty from the Sea", the protagonist spent 30 years to dominate the world. The writing is good and should meet the author's requirements.

This book tells me that real history is never a fantasy and romance, but is extremely profound. I hope the author keeps writing!

It's quite interesting [Send Heart] and it really made me know a lot of new things. Let's make a rough comment: These things are actually not a problem in the novel, because no matter what the problem is, it is the younger brother in the face of the system's dimensionality reduction attack. There is not enough food, the system is spontaneous; does it not know the location of the enemy? System Radar; Minister disobedient? System control... This is also the reason why there are so many articles about systems nowadays. Anyway, there is a system that can solve anything [face covering]

Very real and objective. It is a relatively good popular science work, but it is not suitable for in-depth discussion by the author and readers. [Thinking] Don't forget that novels tend to be entertainment-oriented, not to mention that nowadays they are all mindless and entertaining novels. As long as it doesn't deviate from the reasonable logic circle. As for identity, language, and power, these are not matters. There are still a few wearing them now, and most of them are soul-wearing. Especially since many people have the memories of their original bodies, identity is not a problem. There are also some cheats such as the carrying system. These things are all set up, and other unreasonable things are not to mention. If you really study it carefully, there are not many novels you can read. You are making things more difficult for the author, [smiles] The nine-year compulsory education has almost forgotten how much knowledge and culture a reader can have, how much historical knowledge they can have, unless they are interested in this aspect. However, the information obtained by the author is also different. It will be scrutinized by some people who are biased by marketing accounts, and will also be disliked by people who really understand historical knowledge. Historical imagination articles will also be questioned by readers [Chigua] Reduce the sense of pleasure for readers, [Thinking] To read a novel, you need to read a lot of ancient history. If the author is not able to simplify or condense it, it will easily make the reader feel clumsy. Various types of historical novels have different readers, and they have different ideas about reading novels. Not everyone will investigate the historical knowledge and political logic of the time.

The suggestions inside are very useful. Anyone who writes about historical classification in Tomato should read it.

The popular science article is generally good and I give it four stars, but some of the descriptions are too absolutely extreme and even slightly inconsistent. After reading this, I know how good our country is even more. Understand the origin of the legendary dowry three quilts in some areas of Jiangxi

The writing is good, just like listening to storytelling. If you avoid everything written by the author, it may not be that satisfying, but if someone writes a book that eliminates all the pitfalls the author said, I would read it. [Eat melon]

After reading the first few chapters, I recalled the time-travel novels I had read before, and my evaluation was quite to the point.

For popular science, you can refer to the logic to prevent violating common sense and destroying the sense of substitution. You don't need to take the rest seriously. Internet articles are products where logic makes way for emotions.

Regardless, it's great. The content is quite emotional, but just to increase my sensitivity to the matter is enough to give it five stars.

It's a good talk, but no matter how good you talk, people will still write a system and let the system take care of all aspects of it.

The writing is good, but the ideas in the book are not read by Tomato. People want cool writing, not truth. This is typical of Tomato. Few people read famous books. Why? Because they are real and not satisfying enough. The more real the book is, the more it needs to please the superiors to grant power, and the more it needs to work in the cracks, the less likely it is to become popular on Tomato.

In this materialistic world, there are always some people who insist on their ideals and bottom line, not because of what they will gain by doing so, but because we know that some things should be this beautiful. A true idealist is one who keeps falling, failing, and trying new paths in the process of pursuing his or her ideals, and finally finds a path that can realize his or her ideals in reality [Like] [Laughs], good luck to the author! I think your point of view is very interesting, please continue writing [Like][Like][Like]

It's good for reading popular science, but I'm often too lazy to search for things. Many times, due to different eras or different situations, the left and right brains appear to be competing. For this, I suggest that you read each chapter as a separate popular science. You can selectively ignore some places that are linked to the Qing Dynasty, because the places that are linked to the Qing Dynasty are too confusing [face covering] For example, at the beginning of the first chapter of the ninth volume, the folk rumors caused by the Qing Dynasty's too much history can only be said to be very reasonable and can be selectively ignored [eating melon]

After reading this book, you will understand that feudalism eats people without spitting out their bones. In the old days, people were full of desires, and the relationships between people were full of rules, favors, and interests. The ruling class had no family ties and only had the possibility of conscience, while the people at the bottom who lived under feudal ethics and ethics had a pure life. Rejoice in the emancipation of our minds. People have finally found themselves. We are saddened by the war in Gaza, anxious by the deterioration of the environment, angry by unequal events, chased by love, moved by sentimental things, and feel lucky for ourselves. In an era of innocence, we need to understand the past, criticize the past, and transcend the past.

Yes, even though I only read a little bit, I can see that the author is designated to study history. Indeed, basically all current entertainment products about history do not follow history. Because if you want to follow history, it's not easy to sell. The author's writing is really good, alas, but today's authors don't care about this anymore. Just say, I have a system. Food issues are provided by the system. Grab what the artillery system gives you. Given by the soldier system. Anyway, I just ignore all these problems. It made me feel a little confused about the system.

I randomly clicked in from the recommendation page and was completely shocked by the result. The author's historical knowledge, social experience, political literacy, logical thinking, and literary expression are all top choices... This article can be read over and over again. If a physical book is published, you must buy it and collect it! ! !

I advise comrades to read more to avoid being deceived by intellectuals. Many parts of this book need to be read in light of reality, but in short, the same sentence remains: novels are novels, reality is reality, and novels cannot be comprehensive. Besides, people come to read novels, not to read theory. There are professional books.

It's strange. Most of the text reviews are five or four stars, so why is the overall rating only 6.5? [As of January 4, 2026] Could it be that it has touched a sore spot for some people and just clicked one star and ran away? [Laughing and crying][laughing and crying][laughing and crying]

Good novels are rarely popular science, they are all for fun. Who wants to read a novel and look in the mirror? Isn't this me? Isn't that more painful?

Coming from the twelfth volume of Dou, I briefly read a few chapters and other articles. No wonder 6.5 Is a science popularization of ancient materialism. But today is the era of cool articles. Unless you have a heart, it is easy to read boringly. This part may be my best for it, which is also my current opinion. After all, it may be different in a few days.

I read the book and then posted a lot of comments. Some of them are arguing with those who make bad remarks, and some are thinking about the author's ideas. In fact, I thought about it later, those people who write time travel stories with real enthusiasm and a more rigorous attitude. They should have a beautiful vision and a beautiful goal in their hearts. So they need to choose the good side 90% of the time between a good choice and a bad choice in history. Because they have to keep the story going. In the end, there will be a peaceful and prosperous age, and all nations will come to court, which can be regarded as fulfilling one's wish. This book can actually be used as a textbook, a self-examination collection of gaps. So that people in the future can use it to alert themselves and write better works. Of course, this is just from the perspective of this book.

Overall it's pretty good, but I feel like in some places, in order to emphasize the difficulty, the expressions are too absolute, and there's a bit of a contradiction.

I've seen a small part of it, and it's quite pertinent.

Recommended, personal opinion, for reference only

Very good popular science article! It analyzes in detail the difficulties that may be encountered in the time travel from the superstructure, social and economic foundation, etc. It is a rare tomato book with dialectical materialism and historical materialism thinking.

I hope you guys can learn from it and write the kind of historical fiction I like.