Analysis of Murder Part 2: the Hand of Truth (Part 2)

If you are tired of the cheap confrontation, incitement and pseudo-awakening, if you are willing to endure a slow rain that penetrates the bone marrow, and see the most real and complex gray area of ​​human nature; if you believe that even in the deepest darkness, there should always be someone stubbornly holding the eternal light - then go find his book. He is the most objective author I have ever read. She does not mock justice. The police in her novels will be angry and powerless, and they will helplessly watch criminals escape because of the loopholes in the system. But they never betrayed their oath. He said: "The work of the police is not that magical. It is done step by step." He wrote about the helplessness of justice, but never laughed at those who persisted. He makes no excuses for sin. He can spend a lot of pen and ink writing about a criminal's childhood and how he was hurt and distorted. But you never see her say, "So it makes sense that he's like this." He writes about the tragedy of "choice". The most depressing thing in his book is not the sudden external disasters, but the powerlessness of being dragged step by step into the abyss by fate after making a "good choice." A policeman helped his neighbor out of duty, but he was in trouble; a girl desperately asked for help after being domestically violent, but her distress signal was blocked at all links. This suffocating feeling of "falling short of success" constitutes his unique tragic aesthetics.