Sky Screen: I Shared Wild History, and the Ancients Said It Was the Real Deal

There are many interesting historical references, and the author himself understands them very well. It's just that the ancestors' reaction descriptions are a bit sparse. It feels like one video follows another, with not many reaction descriptions interspersed in between. But overall, it's pretty good and interesting.

It's a beautiful story, and it's not a nonsense. Some of the detailed historical chapters are different from the simple history that most of us know now. It has depth, and it doesn't make people feel like I read it once on Douyin, and another author made it into text for me to read the same thing again. There is no overly stereotyped historical figures, and there will also be profound negative analyzes of history in modern times, as well as comments that I can directly see. Most of the Tianmu texts do not seem to place so much emphasis on evaluating history and historical figures.

I don't understand why the rating is so low. I feel like it would be fine if it was more than eight points. Although there are minor inaccuracies, at least most of the historical facts are correct. You can read it even if you ignore the minor issues, and the writing is pretty good. Let me complain about other things first. For the video-watching category, there are mainly historical and non-historical categories, but both categories have disadvantages. The historical category basically only talks about history, and can only be used to understand history, unless the plot is written appropriately (referring to the proportion of the actions of historical figures after understanding them). Non-historical articles generally belong to the fun genre, but this kind of entertainment is seriously inconsistent with general historical facts, and except for the beginning, the proportion of famous historical figures that everyone wants to read becomes smaller and smaller towards the end (isn't the main purpose of reading this kind of historical article just to see your favorite famous figures? You can write about small characters, but it becomes more general and very boring as you go towards the end). The last thing is the control of the writing style. The proportion of the videos and the reactions of the ancients in this kind of writing is very important. Many of the videos I watched before were all written, and then modern people posted a lot of comments or comments, accounting for at least two-thirds of the whole text. The reactions of the ancients may be more at first, but will become less in the future, and they will not even write about historical figures at all. Instead, they will write general translations, such as the ancients were surprised, the ancients were guilty, the ancients were angry... Boring. I want to watch history, but most of them are purely about history, and the funny points are just hyped up. When I watch entertainment videos, I want to see the reaction of ancient people watching modern second creations and spoofs (such videos can also be funny while telling history, but not many people can write them, and there are very few). However, entertainment generally does not have much history, so naturally there is no such thing as what I want to watch. Okay, finally come to the topic I want to say. This article almost perfectly meets my needs: ① The protagonist of the tool is still there, and she is almost invisible in the back (I actually think this is good, some have to write the reaction of the protagonist of the tool, and the writing is very embarrassing), and reduces a lot of meaningless shaping (not to say that it cannot be shaped, the point is that many of them are written in a very awkward way, it is better not to shape, the writing is quite flat). ②I think the proportion of various arrangements in the article is great. There is no problem of having to finish a long video. It is appropriate to omit it. Secondly, there are comments about modern people, such as barrages. I didn't include a lot of them as is the common problem in many articles of this type. I chose very typical and short ones. The focus of the article is on the reactions of the ancients (it is well written, not embarrassing, but interesting to read), and what the ancients did after extracting details of historical events. There are also some entertainment aspects, but most of them are based on second creations by historical fans (I finally found what I wanted to read, and I am very happy). The historical figures who appear are mainly named and surnamed. Generally speaking, all aspects of this article are to my liking. As for the issue of lobbyists not being objective, I think there is no need to get too entangled. Even those who compile official history may not be completely objective. This article is already very objective. How can we completely abandon subjective consciousness? To say that it is too subjective, I feel that most of them see some negative information about their favorite historical figures in it, coupled with the belittling reaction of the ancients, which makes them feel subjective. However, as I said above, subjectivity cannot be completely discarded. Moreover, individuals have their own stains. It is normal for some people not to like it. This article is well written, and it is not overly direct and insulting. If you don't like it, don't read it.

I really like the canopy type of articles, but many of them are relatively mindless. This article has avoided all my red flags very well. First of all, the protagonist is a pure tool person without knowing it, and he does not live broadcast his daily life. It feels like he is voyeuristic, and he just watches videos. Secondly, 80% of the videos selected are historical, which can bring benefits to the ancients and appeal to readers who like this type of writing. The most disgusting thing is articles that use a lot of modern information. The ancients either can't understand it or are not interested. The word count is just water. In addition, serious and funny videos are interspersed, which avoids the boredom that may be caused by watching a single type of video for a long time. The selection of videos is good, and they are all up owners that I follow. I suggest you also write about Xudu Bar's dynasty chat group series, as well as some famous historical drama clips and their second creations, such as Ming Dynasty 1566, as well as the four famous TV series mentioned, clips and ghost clips.

The biggest feeling this book gives me is that it is really funny. Some of the unofficial histories I know, some I don't know, but they are all interesting [face covering] Who knows how to laugh until your courage aches while reading this book? The laughter is really dense, and sometimes you can learn some historical trivia. [Working on manuscript][Working on manuscript][Working on manuscript]

This thing in the old collection of the Confucius Mansion was dug up suddenly. Trivia: there are almost more than 8,000 pieces in the old collection of the Confucius Mansion, including all kinds of clothing and jewelry. In fact, there are no more than a hundred pieces of clothing and jewelry from the Ming Dynasty, two pieces of clothing from the Yuan Dynasty, and the rest are from the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. Also, this thing is from the Jinzhu Mami after the liberation of Qufu. , They were copied and registered after being found and registered by the Confucius Mansion. They were finally restored and put on display. It was not a voluntary donation at all. The old collection of the Confucius Mansion had been ruined by Hanfu merchants. There were many exhibits in 2012. I don't know why it was dug out by a group of marketing accounts last year to promote the Kong family. Was it intentional or what?

Can you write about Kangxi being the son of Hong Chengchou?

It's really good to watch. The videos are not all about entertainment, but are interspersed with historical content, and the descriptions of the ancients are very appropriate. It's not like other novels that are becoming more and more perfunctory and just write "the ancestors couldn't help but be speechless/laughing when they looked at

After watching it, I think it's okay. It's pretty good in this category. You can watch it. The overall quality is okay. The characters of the Ancients are pretty good, the dialogues are pretty good, and the video arrangement is OK. Overall, it's not too good-looking, but it's watchable. I won't continue reading.

I really like talking about cp, guessing characters with beanbags, and who is the undercover agent. Please do more🤲🏻 He also took out Emperor Wu and trampled him. The impression and view of Liu Ju's benevolence, gentleness and recuperation basically came from Sima Guang. Sima Qian did not praise Liu Ju, but he said that Liu Ju doted on Li Gan's son Li Yu (and doted on Li Gan's daughter). What kind of person is Li Yu? [The brave man Yu favored the prince, but he was interested in profit, and the Li family mausoleum declined slowly.] In Sima Qian's eyes, he was an unworthy descendant of the Li family. Ban Gu also did not describe Liu Ju's character and achievements. But one thing is written, that is, "As soon as I get to the palace, I will set up Bowang Garden above, so that I can communicate with the guests and follow their preferences, so most of them come in as heretics." That is to say, Liu Che gave him Libo Wangyuan and asked him to form a party in private. However, many of these guests are heretical scholars and are not very comfortable. Even if Emperor Wu is in his late stage, the people will not be willing to rebel against the prince when they hear that Emperor Wu is still alive. Think about it for yourself, if Emperor Wu is really that stupid and if the prince is really that good, why are the people unwilling to follow Liu Zhi? Regardless of the reason for Liu Ju's rebellion, it is a fact that tens of thousands of people died. If it is not dealt with, it cannot be justified. Otherwise, all future princes will be able to use this excuse to rebel? Look at how Liu Bing has dealt with the Huo family's rebellion and implicated the execution of thousands of families. What does the thousands of families mean? A conservative estimate would be tens of thousands of people.