
Stats
5.8Score
Synopsis
No synopsis yet.
We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.

We haven’t got an English blurb for this one. It appears once the source description has been translated.
It's simple, biased toward hundreds, the writing is excellent, and it's biased towards hydrology. There is zero description of women's clothing, women's bodies, and women's degeneration. The background setting is very good, the battle scenes are well described, and it can be treated as a genderless protagonist. The plot is compact and contains a lot of foreshadowing. The heroine's golden finger is also very powerful, and it is a pity that it was discontinued.
It's okay, but it's a little uncomfortable. It obviously suppresses the protagonist's combat power. I need to work harder.
The writing is very good, and the subject matter is relatively new (at least I haven't seen it before), but the title is not very attractive. I have seen it many times, so I just didn't click on it. It's just that the title is not pleasing to my eyes. But, well, the title is very well summarized. Maybe it's my own problem. When you are criticized by others, think about whether you can write something like this
Good-looking, really good, good, five points.
It's okay, but my writing is not that good and I still need to work hard.