How Come I Am Invincible When I Lend Money in a Group?

Apart from the smooth and creative writing, this book has almost no redeeming features. Although the novel is fictional, there should be a reason for a certain system or a certain kind of inertia. The phenomenon of borrowing and lending has existed since ancient times. The reasons for its existence, although manifested in different forms in different eras, are also very bad in some cases. But in essence, it is because it belongs to a relatively peaceful era, which means that he has scruples about doing something to you. Although the power of this scruple may be strong or small, it is always there. In the world of this novel, this kind of borrowing is very unreasonable. Let's assume that the top leaders in this world have no restrictions, so why do they want to borrow money? Why should I play loan with you? Why can't your class be determined directly from birth? Similar situations should have occurred in various civilizations in history. Classes were already determined at birth. Giving you a loan has no meaning other than increasing their workload and increasing people's dissatisfaction with them. If their rights are subject to certain restrictions, even if the restrictions are small. So since they choose to use loans. You shouldn't set traps everywhere, because the trap itself has destroyed the loan itself, and the two are actually in conflict. Looking back at some situations in the world of cultivating immortals. In many worlds of cultivators, there is a huge gap between ordinary people and cultivators, and cultivators often don't care too much about ordinary people. But they won't go too far to attack ordinary people. Because they need ordinary people to add fresh blood. And the world seems not to need it. Since there is no need to replenish fresh blood from ordinary people, then if ordinary people are valuable to them, why do they need to lend money? In other words, why should we give hope to ordinary people? Since hope is given, why are there traps everywhere? Then let's talk about the protagonist himself. The protagonist can break through so many traps. Is this an exception or can most people do this? If most people had the ability to break through these traps, then there shouldn't be so many traps. If most people can't break the trap, then what's the point of this final assessment? Most people couldn't make it to the scene anyway. Then the protagonist can break through so many traps. Assuming that most of them can't break through them, isn't the fake protagonist too conspicuous? He should have been arrested before the test, after all. It's like us ordinary people eat more in this world. Suddenly there is a person who can't eat for 18 consecutive years until the college entrance examination. Do you think he won't be arrested?

The subject matter is relatively novel and quite interesting, but according to this trend, the protagonist will most likely become a dragon-slaying boy and eventually become an evil dragon. If this world were an immortal, there would be no problem

The author wants to reflect reality through the novel, satirize injustice, and occasionally make some jokes that are humorous, but he talks too much. The protagonist is like an angry young man who stayed up for three days and nights in an electronics factory. The most important thing is that if there is too much depressing and powerless content, the sense of fun will be lost.

Pure double standards, when you let it go: I've made a lot of money, I'm really good, but when you encounter the reality and others let it go: the world is unfair, and the summary is to reincarnate a certain three

I don't know the author, what he thinks about the world in his heart, but the protagonist in his novel is a bit too dramatic. He is like a puppet standing on the stage. He is capable, but not very capable of positioning himself correctly. I feel that if nothing happens to the protagonist in the future, the author will write that the protagonist may be partially assimilated into this world. In other aspects, it will be okay. It depends on what the author writes later? But I have expressed this kind of angry youth and similar emotions in my heart many times, which feels a bit boring. I think the author can express less. After all, most of the novels are read for pleasure. The ugly thing is to let oneself oppress others and satisfy one's inner desires. The author has repeatedly written about the inner feelings of the protagonist, or the author's irony of the world. I can't say that my impression of this book is very big, but some parts do exist. I hope the author pays attention to it.

To solve the incident of Xiaoyan breaking off the engagement, the system collected one-tenth of his luck and cultivation qualifications, and the protagonist received one percent of his luck and qualifications.

Dragon King, you are poisoning me to death.

All the authors have novels with hundreds of thousands of words, and none of them has scored more than 8 points.

Goldfinger is too petty.

Quite NB, not bad

What stands out is a loan. The system is still a middleman. The person who borrowed the goods has lost his cultivation qualifications and 1/10 of his luck. What the protagonist gets is one percent of his qualifications and one thousandth of his luck.

When capitalists come to this novel world, they will feel that they are still too kind, [laughing evilly] [laughing evilly]

It is estimated that it will be cool at any time. The author revealed the truth about the world. I thought about a question, are so-called saints saints for everyone?

The writing is good, but I don't like the character of the protagonist. He is as timid as a mouse. He has the temperament bonus of Ying Zheng but is still a loser. He is manipulated by a woman and admits that he is the face of that woman. Many unreasonable demands make the protagonist feel aggrieved. I feel like the group is of little use. . . Not much benefit is gained. . .

The writing is good, but can you please not show the plot of "Small World"? I only wrote five or six chapters. I am speechless.

Unexpectedly, there are 100 ways I can think of to destroy that world.

[Thinking] Well written, but a bit unreasonable! If normal people are squeezed too hard, they will not get married and have children. If the population is not enough, the higher-ups will "show favors." What you wrote is that they are constantly being squeezed. I hope you will make up for the mistakes later and improve your worldview.

I suggest you write more about the senior sister. It's still very interesting. The Little World is too long. It's only 5 or 6 chapters. I still hope that the senior sister will be the heroine or be included in the harem. The character creation is also good. The important characters are very vivid and vivid. It doesn't feel like a blank sheet of paper. I love reading it.

Heartless, but still not cautious enough

When you've coded ten million words, I'll look at one thousandth

A very good article. Ha ha

My senior is pretty good, I can accept it.

I don't know how this book ended up on the shelf!

It's okay, but I don't have any hope for this later stage. I don't know if the author wants the protagonist to be a ghost demon and kill the whole world.

A great book that truly conveys emotions. Although the logic is not very strong in some places, the flaws are not concealed. There are many places in the book that show an idealistic tone. It is infinitely better than many of the current quick books that are enjoyable but have no nutrition. I hope the author can persevere and keep going.

The writing is not bad, just reduce the plots in other worlds and write more about the world of the protagonist.

It looks good, confirms reality, exaggerates reality, I hope it will not be harmonized, more updates, I am willing to keep chasing it

Come on, generate electricity for love, I'm quite satisfied

Very interesting novel.

So well written, a masterpiece