Li Zhian, a taxi driver in his 40s, drives sports cars day after day to support his family. Although his life is not easy, it is considered stable. Until one day, he heard a social hot topic on the news: a girl was criticized by the whole people because of the revelation that her "private life was chaotic", and everyone was talking about it. However, Li Zhian soon realized that the girl who was scolded on the hot search was the passenger he had carried, and he was the only one who knew the truth.
But does the truth matter? He didn't want to meddle in other people's business. After all, this kind of news happened every day and no one cared about it. But soon, his license plate number was exposed, and he was mistaken by public opinion as the girl's "accomplice". Passengers looked at him strangely, and even his family was affected...
In order to prove his innocence, he had to find out the truth, but the more he investigated, the more he discovered that things were not as simple as they seemed. At the same time, his wife Li Huilan also encountered another silent campaign in the company - her seriousness and responsibility became the reason for others to attack her. Both of them were holding on and said they could solve it, but the reality pushed them to the brink of collapse.
Is this crisis a "little thing" or a destiny-changing whirlpool?
Reader comments
Let me talk about my feelings after reading the first chapter. I have the feeling of reading a junior high school narrative. It feels like the author wants to write a story that unfolds against the background of ordinary trivial matters in daily life. However, the trivial facts explained by the author in the writing process are too fragmentary. If this can have a sense of life, I can accept it, but everything in it feels like it. It's like a human-machine retelling. I think that kind of realism is lacking, but it's also constructed in the author's imagination. I can understand it, but it's too complicated. Moreover, you say it's fine, it's wrinkled, and so on, but it doesn't seem to explain anything. You say it's not fine, and there's a lot of description, in terms of clothing, expressions, and expressions. I came here recommended by AI search book. In fact, these are not related. In fact, when I look at it, I feel like I am watching my writing. I have conceived the story, but the language of expression is too single. The issues discussed in the story are based on the author's thoughts on ordinary life in the first chapter. Many details of life cannot withstand scrutiny. If you want to hold a parent-teacher meeting or form a group, no one should know at the parent-teacher meeting. Why is the child conveying the unexpected meeting? This book has the author's thoughts, but it is too paper-based. Especially in the first paragraph, I think it should be possible to use a flashback, um, to provide a smoother foreshadowing, rather than having to rely on verbal narration to express it.
The above only represents my personal opinion. If you feel it is inconsistent with the article, thank you for commenting. I hope the author can write better and better articles.
Let me talk about my feelings after reading the first chapter. I have the feeling of reading a junior high school narrative. It feels like the author wants to write a story that unfolds against the background of ordinary trivial matters in daily life. However, the trivial facts explained by the author in the writing process are too fragmentary. If this can have a sense of life, I can accept it, but everything in it feels like it. It's like a human-machine retelling. I think that kind of realism is lacking, but it's also constructed in the author's imagination. I can understand it, but it's too complicated. Moreover, you say it's fine, it's wrinkled, and so on, but it doesn't seem to explain anything. You say it's not fine, and there's a lot of description, in terms of clothing, expressions, and expressions. I came here recommended by AI search book. In fact, these are not related. In fact, when I look at it, I feel like I am watching my writing. I have conceived the story, but the language of expression is too single. The issues discussed in the story are based on the author's thoughts on ordinary life in the first chapter. Many details of life cannot withstand scrutiny. If you want to hold a parent-teacher meeting or form a group, no one should know at the parent-teacher meeting. Why is the child conveying the unexpected meeting? This book has the author's thoughts, but it is too paper-based. Especially in the first paragraph, I think it should be possible to use a flashback, um, to provide a smoother foreshadowing, rather than having to rely on verbal narration to express it. The above only represents my personal opinion. If you feel it is inconsistent with the article, thank you for commenting. I hope the author can write better and better articles.