[Naruto World + Time Travel + Rebirth + Uchiha + Gou + Talisman]
A Taoist priest who did not understand the plot of Naruto (the Naruto anime only saw the mission of the Kingdom of Waves) traveled to the Uchiha clan in the world of Naruto.
He has no system, no qualifications, and no strong backers. He is a perfect "three no" person!
Fortunately, he combined Taoist talismans and chakra to develop ninjutsu talismans.
See how he relies on his ability to draw talismans with one hand, in this dangerous world, holding Otsutsuki Kaguya in his hand, kicking the Shura Dance King of the Ninja World, sitting on the Sky Throne, overlooking the entire Ninja World.
Reader comments
(Top middle) Five-star green, 4 items B
Sense of substitution C, attraction D, plug-in C, setting C, writing style B, imagination B, rhythm B, main line B, character design D, logic C
Balance Penalty: None
───────────────────
#The following comments are for personal reference only
#My account cannot leave negative reviews. Negative reviews will be invisible. Anyway, they will all be given five stars.
#The overall rating increases, and there will be no negative comments in the comments.
1. Recommended Evaluation Criteria•11th Edition
(1) Evaluation items (for personal reference only)
1. Sense of immersion: The attraction at the beginning and the foreshadowing of the world view.
2. Attraction: follow-up attraction, follow-up reading.
3. Plug-in: The golden finger is reasonable and functionally innovative.
4. Setting: background credibility, system self-consistency.
5. Writing style: Does each paragraph promote the development of the plot?
6. Brainstorming: Whether each small story is connected to the main line.
7. Rhythm: Are you tired of reading or feel that the word count is low?
8. Main line: Whether all plots revolve around the core goal.
9. Character design: Is the protagonist's behavior consistent and whether the supporting characters are impressive?
10. Logic: Whether making money, cultivating, etc. Are consistent with basic cognition.
11. Extra points deduction: balance the scores of the first 10 items, data, economy, structure, three perspectives, supporting roles, time, geography, knowledge...
(2) Evaluation grouping (for personal reference only)
1. First impression: sense of immersion at the beginning, subsequent attraction
2. World background: reasonable plug-ins and background settings
3. Content: Writing • Promote plot, imagination • Secondary innovation
4. Structure: Rhythm • Overall coherence, main line • Close to the center
5. Details: Persona·Character design, logic·Consistent with common sense
(3) Ratings of recommended evaluation items (for personal reference only)
1. Specially recommended S level (+4 points)
2. Recommended Grade A (+2 points)
3. Acceptable Level B (+1 point)
4. No points deducted, Grade C (0 points)
5. Level D is not recommended (-1 point)
6. Personally unacceptable level E (-3 points)
2. Rating of online articles
(1) Shangshang•Online articles that I personally can't find fault with
Standard: No B rating, attractiveness S
1. Five-star red+: 5 items S, 5 items A
2. Five-star red: 2 items S, 8 items A
3. Five-star red-: 10 items A
(2) Excellent Internet articles that I personally feel most people like
Criteria: Rare and fine book, no C-grade rating, appeal A
1. Five-star Orange+: Total score is 18 or above, and 8 items are A or above
2. Five-star orange: and the total score is level 16 or above
3. Five-star orange-: 5 items A
(3) Shang Xia·Personally feel high-level online articles
Standard: common high-quality books, no D-level evaluation, attractiveness B
1. Five-star Purple+: Level 14 or above, and 4 A or above
2. Five-star purple: Level 10 or above
3. Five-star purple-: 8 items B
(4) Intermediate to upper level • Internet articles that I feel are of a high standard
Standard: Personal recommendation, no E-rating, attractiveness C
1. Five-star blue+: total score is 6 or above, and 6 items are B or above
2. Five-star blue: total score is level 4 or above
3. Five-star green: 4 items B
(5) Medium •Standard online articles that I personally like
Standard: no poisonous spots, no bright spots, attractiveness C
1. Four-star green+: total score is level 2 or above, and no E-level evaluation
2. Four-star green: total score is level 1 or above
3. Four-star white: 10 items C
(6) The next one: Standard online articles that I don't like
1. Samsung White+: Level 0, and no E-level evaluation
2. Samsung white: -1 level
3. Samsung White-:-Level 2
(7) Middle and lower two • Internet articles that I personally do not recommend
1. Two-star white+: level -3
2. Two-star white: -Level 4
(8) Middle and lower three • Internet articles that are unacceptable to individuals
1. Two-star gray+: -5 levels
2. Two-star gray: -level 6
3. Two-star gray-:-Level 7
(9) There is a lot of room for improvement
1. One star +: level -8
2. One star: -Level 9
(10) Inferior·Silent
1. Sporadic: -Level 10
(11) Xiaxia·Silent
The writing is very good, but it's not what I like to read. The author treats the characters in the original work as normal people, but I feel that the normal people in Naruto are all villains [facepalm]. (I personally don't like it)
Yes, the combination of talismans and ninjutsu means that the combat power is a bit broken, and the protagonist becomes stronger a bit quickly.
(Top middle) Five-star green, 4 items B Sense of substitution C, attraction D, plug-in C, setting C, writing style B, imagination B, rhythm B, main line B, character design D, logic C Balance Penalty: None ─────────────────── #The following comments are for personal reference only #My account cannot leave negative reviews. Negative reviews will be invisible. Anyway, they will all be given five stars. #The overall rating increases, and there will be no negative comments in the comments. 1. Recommended Evaluation Criteria•11th Edition (1) Evaluation items (for personal reference only) 1. Sense of immersion: The attraction at the beginning and the foreshadowing of the world view. 2. Attraction: follow-up attraction, follow-up reading. 3. Plug-in: The golden finger is reasonable and functionally innovative. 4. Setting: background credibility, system self-consistency. 5. Writing style: Does each paragraph promote the development of the plot? 6. Brainstorming: Whether each small story is connected to the main line. 7. Rhythm: Are you tired of reading or feel that the word count is low? 8. Main line: Whether all plots revolve around the core goal. 9. Character design: Is the protagonist's behavior consistent and whether the supporting characters are impressive? 10. Logic: Whether making money, cultivating, etc. Are consistent with basic cognition. 11. Extra points deduction: balance the scores of the first 10 items, data, economy, structure, three perspectives, supporting roles, time, geography, knowledge... (2) Evaluation grouping (for personal reference only) 1. First impression: sense of immersion at the beginning, subsequent attraction 2. World background: reasonable plug-ins and background settings 3. Content: Writing • Promote plot, imagination • Secondary innovation 4. Structure: Rhythm • Overall coherence, main line • Close to the center 5. Details: Persona·Character design, logic·Consistent with common sense (3) Ratings of recommended evaluation items (for personal reference only) 1. Specially recommended S level (+4 points) 2. Recommended Grade A (+2 points) 3. Acceptable Level B (+1 point) 4. No points deducted, Grade C (0 points) 5. Level D is not recommended (-1 point) 6. Personally unacceptable level E (-3 points) 2. Rating of online articles (1) Shangshang•Online articles that I personally can't find fault with Standard: No B rating, attractiveness S 1. Five-star red+: 5 items S, 5 items A 2. Five-star red: 2 items S, 8 items A 3. Five-star red-: 10 items A (2) Excellent Internet articles that I personally feel most people like Criteria: Rare and fine book, no C-grade rating, appeal A 1. Five-star Orange+: Total score is 18 or above, and 8 items are A or above 2. Five-star orange: and the total score is level 16 or above 3. Five-star orange-: 5 items A (3) Shang Xia·Personally feel high-level online articles Standard: common high-quality books, no D-level evaluation, attractiveness B 1. Five-star Purple+: Level 14 or above, and 4 A or above 2. Five-star purple: Level 10 or above 3. Five-star purple-: 8 items B (4) Intermediate to upper level • Internet articles that I feel are of a high standard Standard: Personal recommendation, no E-rating, attractiveness C 1. Five-star blue+: total score is 6 or above, and 6 items are B or above 2. Five-star blue: total score is level 4 or above 3. Five-star green: 4 items B (5) Medium •Standard online articles that I personally like Standard: no poisonous spots, no bright spots, attractiveness C 1. Four-star green+: total score is level 2 or above, and no E-level evaluation 2. Four-star green: total score is level 1 or above 3. Four-star white: 10 items C (6) The next one: Standard online articles that I don't like 1. Samsung White+: Level 0, and no E-level evaluation 2. Samsung white: -1 level 3. Samsung White-:-Level 2 (7) Middle and lower two • Internet articles that I personally do not recommend 1. Two-star white+: level -3 2. Two-star white: -Level 4 (8) Middle and lower three • Internet articles that are unacceptable to individuals 1. Two-star gray+: -5 levels 2. Two-star gray: -level 6 3. Two-star gray-:-Level 7 (9) There is a lot of room for improvement 1. One star +: level -8 2. One star: -Level 9 (10) Inferior·Silent 1. Sporadic: -Level 10 (11) Xiaxia·Silent The writing is very good, but it's not what I like to read. The author treats the characters in the original work as normal people, but I feel that the normal people in Naruto are all villains [facepalm]. (I personally don't like it)
Yes, the combination of talismans and ninjutsu means that the combat power is a bit broken, and the protagonist becomes stronger a bit quickly.