You Say I'm Not the Original Creator? I'll Take Back the Copyright!

It's very beautiful, but it's all bullshit. There's no copyright to the original song? Even if you sell the right to use it, you still have the copyright. You can just check it directly on the official website. You can't solve it with dozens of pictures. It's really beautiful.

It's good, but I don't know why the rating is so low. It seems to have attracted a lot of stupid readers who don't belong to this genre. I don't know that this is already very good in the same genre. Oops, it turns out that the rhythm of the plot is too slow and the water injection is very strong. I am more patient and watch it, so I don't think it is a poisonous point. Reading time is usually fragmented. For example, when I am fishing at work, I read for ten minutes, so I read in a hurry. I need to speed up the pace a bit. If I can stack it up to the point where I can go to jail, it is time to harvest it quickly. Continuing to pile up the crime is just the icing on the cake, and it can be thrown out in court as additional evidence, and the crime will be increased. (The reading progress has not reached the court session when writing the book review.) This part of the public opinion war has dragged on for too long, and it seems to have been fought back and forth three times. My teacher once taught me that no matter what happens, it actually means no more than two things. For bad things, if they happen twice, don't let them happen a third time. (I think it is not good for similar plots to occur multiple times in the same scene, as it will increase reading fatigue) However, I am only interested in the litigation part (I like to read books on the subject of lawyers). I actually prefer entertainment novels to games. After reading this part, I will leave. Give a good review to encourage the author.

Wow, what a breath of fresh air in the entertainment industry! The IQ of the supporting characters is online, which is great. A work of master level. . . . . . . . Come on, author, I've urged for an update. . .

Good. But now it's really uncomfortable to read Shuangwen without a system. In the beginning, it was okay if there was no system text. Later, when I read the non-system text after I got the system text, it felt like cheating in a single-player game. I still insisted that I didn't open it, and insisted that I came down from the mountain with a golden cudgel with four beans and a fire... Even City Jue Di Yun felt that he had to have a system to feel comfortable. It was called the "0.01 Times rebate system after being abused." In this way, he could not die no matter how abused he was, but he could also pick up magical skills, treasures (although he didn't want them, but he had the Divine Illumination Sutra, and he probably wouldn't be poisoned if he took them), his wife (did Shui Sheng come with him? I remember they went to the snow valley to raise his junior sister's child)...

I personally like the author's books very much. It's refreshing and clever. There is a lot of nonsense in the book reviews, such as trying to make up the word count and not appearing in Novice Village, etc. There is indeed a little bit, but not much! Not that exaggerated!!! I have read several other novels that are similar, but they are not as good as this one!

From the beginning to more than 200 chapters, the first case is still not over. I am convinced 🥺 🥺 🥺

First of all, this is not a brainless novel. It is completely different from many other brainless entertainment novels. The logic of the novel is clear, the rhythm is tight, there are twists and turns, and there are some exciting moments. Most of the villains have online IQs. Among entertainment novels, I personally think it is the top one.

Finally I saw a version that pays more attention to copyright [laughs awkwardly]

Five stars is for fear of being deleted. If you don't believe in evil, just read it for yourself. If you can persist to chapter 50, you can be considered as the Shennong who is immune to all poisons in this world.

The writing style is acceptable and the logic is smooth. Let's take a look and discuss again.