Legend of the Strange World

(Upper middle/lower bottom) five-star green/two-star malicious, 5 items B Sense of substitution B, attraction D, plug-in B, setting C, writing B, imagination B, rhythm B, main line D, character D, logic D Additional deduction points: D for level classification, D for main character line Personal feelings: Strength is a mystery? It's very contradictory~, did the author deliberately mess with people's mentality? ─────────────────── #Objective evaluation. If you have different opinions, you can evaluate it yourself. This way it should not be blocked. 1. Recommended Evaluation Criteria·Ninth Edition Revised (1) Evaluation items 1. Sense of immersion: The attraction at the beginning and the foreshadowing of the world view. 2. Attraction: follow-up attraction, follow-up reading. 3. Plug-in: The golden finger is reasonable and functionally innovative. 4. Setting: background credibility, system self-consistency. 5. Writing style: Does each paragraph promote the development of the plot? 6. Brainstorming: Whether each small story is connected to the main line. 7. Rhythm: Are you tired of reading or feel that the word count is low? 8. Main line: Whether all plots revolve around the core goal. 9. Character design: Is the protagonist's behavior consistent and whether the supporting characters are impressive? 10. Logic: Whether making money, cultivating, etc. Are consistent with basic cognition. 11. Extra points deduction: balance the scores of the first 10 items, data, economy, structure, three perspectives, supporting roles, time, geography, knowledge... (2) Evaluation grouping 1. First impression: sense of immersion at the beginning, subsequent attraction 2. World background: reasonable plug-ins and background settings 3. Content: Writing • Promote plot, imagination • Secondary innovation 4. Structure: Rhythm • Overall coherence, main line • Close to the center 5. Details: Persona·Character design, logic·Consistent with common sense (3) Rating of recommended evaluation items 1. Highlights: S-level 4 points, A-level 2 points 2. Standard: 1 point for Grade B, 0 points for Grade B 3. Defects: Grade C - 1 point, Grade D - 3 points 3. Rating of online articles (1) Up, up 1. Red+: Total score is above level 30 2. Red: Total score is 26 or above 3. Red-: 10 items A (2) High-quality and bright web articles 1. Orange+: Total score is level 22 or above 2. Orange: Total score is 18 or above 3. Orange-: 5 items A (3) Shang Xia·High-level online articles 1. Purple+: Total score is 14 or above 2. Purple: Total score is level 10 or above 3. Purple-: 10 items B (4) Upper-intermediate and high-level online writing 1. Five-star blue+: total score is level 6 or above 2. Five-star blue: total score is level 4 or above 4. Five-star green: 5 items B (5) Zhongyi·High-standard online articles 1. Four-star green+: total score is level 2 or above 2. Four-star green: total score is level 1 3. Four-star white: 10 items C (6) Middle 2 and 2·Standard online text 1. Samsung White+: Total score -1 level 2. Samsung White: Total Score -2 Level (7) Middle and lower three•Flawed web articles 1. Samsung Gray+: Total score -3 levels 2. Samsung Gray: Total Score -4 Level (6) Xia Shang·Web articles with great flaws 1. Samsung Black+: Total score -5 levels 2. Samsung Black: Total Score -6 Level 3. One-star black +: total score -7 levels 4. One-star black: total score -8 levels 5. Two-star black: 10 items D One star is an invalid rating, two stars is the lowest rating (7) Medium•No rating (lower middle to upper middle) (8) Inferior • No grading (middle to lower to lower) (9) Xiaxia·Malicious 1. The first stage: total score - below level 10 2. The second stage: total score - below level 20 3. The third stage: 10 E

Good book, you can read it [Like]

Not bad, worth a look

Among romance-themed novels, the writing quality is relatively good.