Creating a Civilization from Scratch

It's useless, nanny text 🍉 I want to know how the weak can kill the strong. I have only heard of the strong killing the weak, but I have never heard of the weak killing the strong [awkward laugh] This cultivator is really weak. Who is stronger, the cultivator or the beast? Why should the beast be killed by the cultivator because it is so strong? It shouldn't be the beast that kills the cultivator [awkward laugh][awkward laugh] Strength is strength, weak is weak, strong is strong, good guy, the weak kills the strong666

Didn't I see the comment author and didn't see it either? (Reissue) The author's writing is pretty good, but there are some problems with the definition of concepts, and secondly, the definition of the existence of the protagonist and Goldfinger. In the first world, power comes too easily. Just like humans got the initial power to create the universe, the protagonist's intervention is a bit too ordinary. If the author wants to create a wonderful story, he cannot follow the conventions and must find another way. Although the author later raised the protagonist to a certain philosophical level, the description is not very grand. Personally, I feel that the definition of the protagonist and Goldfinger is relatively limited and infinite. Finite is a category relative to the author's ability in the real universe, and infinite is a category relative to what humans can think about. The scope of the protagonist's power is like a little bit of false infinity separated from true and infinite. The relationship between the two is very close but very different. True and infinity transcends the category of logic. To be precise, it is equivalent to the basis for the birth of all existence. This is as weird as the birth of energy from nowhere in the real universe. Human words are nothing but infinity that can be controlled. If you control everything, you will definitely be swallowed by nothingness. Therefore, the protagonist is between existence and non-existence. The golden finger represents non-existence, and the protagonist represents existence. Everything can be touched, but it is impossible to really touch it, because the existence of the protagonist itself does not exist. From this perspective, what is absolutely easy to contact is often absolutely impossible to contact. Also, the definition of the second world cannot be so narrow, as it will be very linear and boring. The setting of cultivating immortals and round heaven and earth is really boring if you look at it too much. Let's not mention that all of this is based on the real universe. I want to ask, what right does a being who cannot even create the rules of the universe have to think that he has created a world? Even the kind of world that people imagine exists, but the information is received unintentionally, but the reality is that the laws of nature do not follow what people think. Not to mention that the creators cannot even accurately visualize everything they imagine in their minds, and even everything described in the text is a strange world imagined by the readers' brains. The above can be said to be the ultimate narrowness of limitations. In human terms, the creators have written down the real universe too low, and seem to have forgotten where it all comes from. Alas, I can only say that humans are too immature. Summary: The author needs to look at life and the universe from a plain and natural perspective, and explore some sources of inspiration that are not usually noticed.

I have read thousands of novels, and I originally planned to write one, but I thought about it for a few days before writing it, and found that it was extremely difficult to write a novel that I imagined would be close to perfect, so I stopped writing it. It is easy to write a novel at the beginning, but it becomes particularly difficult to write in the middle and late stages of the novel. So I won't write anymore. Let's read the novels you wrote.

Fortunately, it should be a group portrait, which is quite interesting. By the way, is there a realistic plot?

How did you get recommended?

The front part is okay, but the back part is almost all about cultivating immortals. The protagonist's participation is almost 0, and at most he shows up. Don't be stuck in cultivating immortals for too long. You can let several worlds collide, don't just stay in one world [awkward laugh]

I think there are some loopholes in the early writing. However, it is not a big problem in the early days when the setting is basically created. However, after dozens of chapters, it turns out to be very good. The writing style in the early stage is also average, but later on it becomes more and more majestic. The progress is not small. You can try it and see how the later plot is like.

This is my world

Not bad, good 👍,

If the protagonist doesn't like the theocratic world, then don't choose theocratic world at the beginning.