I Start a Chat Group Connecting All Worlds in The Outcast

(Bottom center) White + Standard (-1 level) / 6.5 Points, marked... Sense of substitution C, plug-in D, setting C, writing style C, rhythm C, imagination C, character design C, main line C, logic C. Extra points: none Personal Feelings: Personal Feelings: A standard chat group article with no major flaws. Overall, it is mediocre. The only breakthrough is MC. There is almost no development of it, and the side plot (dungeon world) is blindly launched. #Objective evaluation. If you have different opinions, you can evaluate it yourself. 1. Evaluation of the novel (1) Taking "Four Star Green - Advanced (Level 0)/7.0 Points" as the dividing line, additional points may be deducted for other items based on the first nine evaluations. (2) Recommendation grade evaluation criteria: Excellent S (+4), Excellent A (+2), Good B (+1), Average C (0), Poor D (-1), Extremely Poor E (-3), Unknown X (0). (3) Sense of immersion: interlocking, rapid resonance, and immersion (4) Plug-in: cheat settings (5) Setting: World background, training system... (6) Writing style and detailed description: standardized and smooth, with appropriate style (7) Rhythm·Overall description: Relaxation and suspense setting (8) Imagination·Plot expansion: Surprisingly innovative and self-consistent logic (9) Character design•Main characters: three-dimensional and full, growing and changing (10) Main line • Close to the center: clear and attractive (11) Logic: plot logic, detail logic (12) Extra deduction points: data, economy, structure, three perspectives, supporting roles, time, geography, knowledge... 2. Evaluation Criteria·Trial (1) Logic self-consistency: plug-in C, setting C, character C (2) Overall feeling: sense of substitution C, plug-in C, rhythm C (3) Writing difficulty bonus: rhythm A, imagination A, main line B (4) Details meet the standard: Writing A, Brainstorming B, Logic A (5) Writing theme bonus: Writing S, Rhythm S, Imagination S (6) Rigorous logic: writing style S, character design S, logic S (7) Creative bonus 3. Rating of novels (1) Shangshang (a sacred book that meets the public's taste, unexpectedly excellent)─Five-star red •Super legend (level 24)/10.0 Points+. (2) Superior (interlocking high-scoring online articles that make people addicted to it) - ① Five-star orange + • Legend (level 22) / 10 points; ② Five-star orange • Legend (level 20) / 9.5 Points +; ③ Five-star orange - • Legend (level 18) / 9.5 Points. (3) Shang Xia (high-quality online articles, up to standard in all aspects, bonus or rigorous logic according to the writing theme) - ① Five-star purple + • Legend (level 16) / 9 points; ② Five-star purple • Legend (level 14) / 8.5 Points +; ③ Five-star purple - • Legend (level 12) / 8.5 Points. (4) Upper-middle (excellent online writing, writing difficulty bonus or details meet the standard, one of them meets the standard) - ① Five-star blue + • Excellent (level 10) / 8.0 Points +; ② Five-star blue • Excellent (level 8) / 8.0 Points; ③ Five-star blue - • Excellent (level 6) / 7.5 Points +; ④ Five-star green + • Standard (level 4) / 7.5 Points. (5) Next in the middle (high-standard online writing, logical self-consistency + overall feeling, all standards are met) - ① Four-star green • Advanced (level 2) / 7.0 Points +; ② Four-star green - • Advanced (level 0) / 7.0 Points (6) Middle to lower two (standard online text, logically self-consistent or overall feeling, one of them meets the standard) - ① Four-star white + standard (-1 level) / 6.5 Points; ② Three-star white + standard (-2 level) / 6.0 Points; (7) Middle and lower three (defective web articles) - ① Three-star gray + • Low level (-3 level) / 5.5 Points; ② Three-star gray • Low level (-4 level) / 5.0 Points; ③ Three-star gray - • Qualified (-5 level) / 4.5 Points. (8) Xia Shang (novels with major flaws are missed) - ① Three stars are unqualified (-7 levels) / 4 points; ② Three stars are poor (-9 levels) / 3 points; ③ One star is poor (-11 levels) / 2 points; ④ One star is extremely poor (-13 levels) / 1 point. (9) Xiaxia (disagreement in three views, having special hobbies, seriously affecting the reading experience, and making people physically uncomfortable) - ① Discord in three views (-15 levels)/-1 point; ② Special hobbies (-17 levels)/-3 points; ③ Slight malice (-19 levels)/-6 points; ④Malicious (-21 levels)/-7 points; ⑤ Major malice (-23 levels)/-8 points; ⑥ Extremely malicious (-25 levels)/-9 points; ⑦Unknown (-27 levels)/-10 points. (10) Medium (standard online article that I have no interest in at all, no evaluation) Three stars unknown/x points. (11) Inferior (female channel mixed in, non-standard online writing) 2 stars unknown/0 points. ——Evaluation of the seventh edition, 1,400 words

It's not easy to code the words "kuhehe". If you don't have love, you can't be a little bit poisonous. If you like to watch it, welcome😊, catch insects, you are very welcome! To be picky, go watch a high-rated humanities movie, it has a lot of tomatoes, so there is no need to get mad at me. My level is limited, so I just enjoy reading and writing.

Come on, come on, come on