Honkai: Star Rail Livestreams Across the Myriad Worlds, Scaring Muzan Off from the Start

After watching a lot of movies, this one is okay, but I still don't want the author to be too rigid in the main plot and activities, and occasionally turn his attention to the side plots. From the launch of 1.0 To 2.0, I have been controlling my "To the Dim Star" for more than half a year. The Everwinter Ridge is wrapped up by the old nobles. The ex-great guardian Cyril who was kidnapped, the little girl who bid farewell to her friends and turned into a demon in the White Dew mission, the nanny with a bad memory and the boss who had long regarded her as a family member, the Vidyadhara and his poetry-writing robot who have been reincarnated countless times but can accurately fall in love with the same immortal species... Writing this way would indeed be inconsistent with the title of the book, but the more peaceful daily life and the elements hidden in it, the more people can really feel the shock brought by the concept of "science fiction": a simple business trip collapsed due to the miracle of fertility, and two people who loved each other were separated by hundreds of years; watching the constant loss of memory The lover who remembers is playing out the same drama in front of him until he completely loses the novelty; the monk who suppresses his bloodthirsty instinct and even tries to influence the killing robot; the hunter who is a puppet of the war and chooses to resist the war after experiencing a peaceful life, but dies alone in his hometown because of suspicion and betrayal

It's a rare good book. To be honest, the requirements for good movie-watching are not very high. There is no need for succession and structure. Writing is needed, but the requirements are not high. As long as the audience's character is well written, it will be considered excellent. Unfortunately, there are very few such movies. The author has only fulfilled a few seemingly basic requirements in this book that few moviegoers can meet, and it is already considered excellent. At least as a reader of moviegoers' novels on the four major novel platforms, I think this book is a superior moviegoer. I don't know if I have eaten too much shit and lowered my requirements. Anyway, this book is indeed a good moviegoer. I hope the author will stick to this description mode of describing the characters' reactions in detail, including discussions with the characters, and not follow other movie viewers who write their reactions in the form of barrages. I don't even want to read that kind of barrages (it's better to read the comments on station B) If the author wants to keep readers fresh, he or she must gradually add more audiences to the work as the process progresses. However, it is better to have less than too much, and it must be something the author truly understands. As long as the characters can be written well, it will be fine. Finally, I hope that the author will keep writing. I consider myself an old bookworm. I have read countless books, but it is rare for me to take the initiative to pay attention to the author. I will remind you every day or even send a message. Even the works of those great masters are not that important to me (well, they are not inferior to me in this regard. I am so interested mainly because I am afraid that this book will be lost after reading it). Maybe it is because things are rare and expensive. It is really difficult to find a decent book in this cesspool of film viewing. I don't know how Tomato makes money writing books. I heard that there is no extra money for urging people to write more books, but it does add money for sending a phone call to send a free gift. The author couldn't hold it anymore, so he shouted at the end of the chapter and asked everyone to spend more than ten seconds every day watching a video and giving a small gift. Don't be a eunuch or make the writing worse.

Finally, there is a movie-watching volume that can describe the characters' reactions in detail. I have thoroughly watched the original plot. Everyone has played the game, so there is really no need to retell it. There are also many funny scenes. It is a great movie-watching volume.

Although it is a classic movie-watching stream, the interpretation by imitating the characters is quite good. It is much better than some novels that just copy plots, videos, and tell dirty jokes. I won't say who it is.

Come on, author, I've read a lot of books in the genre of movie watching. (This one is just the beginning, but it feels very interesting [laughs crookedly]) It feels like it's actually quite difficult to write, especially the more anime and games it includes, the harder it is to write. Regardless of whether the characters' reactions are consistent with the original work, or the subsequent impact of watching the movie on different worlds.

It's a very good book. It basically doesn't have the serious OOC problem of normal movie viewing. However, there are problems that are basically the same as the plot, but there are too many "complaints" from characters in other worlds... I haven't seen the back part, so I don't know if it will be consistent. I will decide whether to read it based on my personal interests.

In fact, it is not easy to write this kind of movie-watching type, because it is easy to have OOC situations. This book is good. Fortunately, the characters in the movie are basically not OOC.

The characters are basically real, but some of the characters' speeches are in line with the characters, but are a bit unnatural, which affects the perception of the book and leads to many book lovers who don't know the settings of these characters to quit. However, there is indeed no OOC situation.

It's okay. It's mainly about letting other worlds experience Beng Tie's world view, connecting many worlds. Many people are lamenting the power of the Star God and the advancement of technology. However, the specific character images are relatively rigid. One or two people are usually selected for dialogue. Although the background of the characters is discussed as much as possible and the characters' personalities are adhered to, there are many similar dialogues later. The author may try to briefly summarize the original plot. Then use more pen and ink to collide with the characters' thoughts. And the portrayal of the image will make the characters more three-dimensional and the plot will have more highlights. It's pretty good among fan fiction, as the author connects multiple worlds. And try to restore the original characters as much as possible, without too obvious OOC, but they are mainly Japanese comics, and some other types of works are less involved. The author's writing style is still good, except for the plot. In fact, some of the things that can be really seen are the dialogues and reactions of characters in other worlds, but these are fragmented. There are not many descriptions, and there are relatively few characterizations. In the later stage, a template is formed, which is a repetitive plot routine. In the later period, the writing style gradually became difficult to control the connotation of the characters, and the subsequent character descriptions began to deviate from the original character settings. In fact, this kind of movie viewing style does not require very high writing skills. It does not require too many plot settings, nor does it require a long-term plot plan and outline. You can even write whatever comes to mind, but this tests the author's understanding of the characters. In the later period, the writing style was a bit random, and the fragmented fragments began to be difficult to cohere and support emotional arousal, and it was difficult to resonate. Especially version 3.0, There is obviously a lot to write about here, but the author seems to be a fan of fan dramas, mostly TV dramas and Japanese comics. The world view of these themes cannot produce more profound thinking and discussion. At most, it can only be some casual chats and dialogues between two people. Even this template has been applied too much in the later period, and it has become a bit boring.

Five points. I like reading with in-depth and plot analysis. For example, the description of the appearance is a bit cliché, but the flaws are not hidden. The writing is very good, and you can see the author's love for Bengtie. Many of the plots have been deeply thought out, and he can defeat 99% of people. The characters in other works also have a good image control, and the process from pride to humility after many cognitive breakthroughs is also good. The character's strengths and weaknesses are very three-dimensional, at least better than many flat characters that deliberately emphasize the character's strengths and weaknesses.