The Great Director of Chinese Entertainment: A Playboy in Showbiz

There are three things you don't read in entertainment books: you don't read those that are infatuated with licking the dog, you don't read those that pretend to be a slap in the face, and you don't read those in other fields such as investment and stock trading. It hasn't appeared yet. The rhythm is pretty good. Mark it. There are a lot of pretentious slaps in the back [face covering] [face covering] I don't understand why so many authors like to give other people a halo of wisdom and take the initiative to put their faces in front of the protagonist. Deduct 2 stars and say goodbye. If you like this kind of pretense and slap in the face, you can watch it.

It is a very good entertainment article. The author is professional in the director, screenwriter and editor. It is not just a mindless article. The author's outline should be very complete. It is not just a hammer here and there. It has its own plan. There is also a lot of foreshadowing and emphasis that everyone needs to read carefully. Don't be impatient. The name is so clever that you can solve the puzzles by reading a few lines, paragraphs or chapters. The reading threshold is not very high, and some readers feel that they have to dig deeper when writing a point. The author actually arranged it later, otherwise it will deviate from the plot, so some comments are quite speechless. The only two things that deducted points for me were that some of the plots were a bit laggy, and the other was that I didn't directly express my dislike for some crooked people (it's not the protagonist's point of view, it's the author's writing habits, so I feel slightly unhappy)

It's a very good-looking Huayu article. It's good in everything, but if you write a director's article, the movie and awards are both popular and exciting. I suggest you write it in a more detailed way. Personally, I feel like the character portrayal is okay and it would be better if it has more personality!

There is a plot that I think is quite brilliant and special, that is, Zuo Xiaoqing knows that the male protagonist will not marry her, and she is old. When she meets a suitor who meets the conditions, she shows off her cards with the male protagonist and then separates peacefully. The male protagonist treats the other person as an equal, not an object, and cannot be given to him. There is no force to treat girls like pendants like in other novels, there is no choice, no own thoughts, mindless love for the male protagonist, and no matter what, it will never leave. This is so fresh, very fresh in Tomato, that person is like a living person with his own thoughts, and does not revolve around the male protagonist. Everyone is the protagonist of their own world Did the male protagonist develop his love for Jing Tian? In the end, she is not the heroine. She is very beautiful in appearance, but it is really difficult to convince people that she is a prodigal son who wants to turn around for her. She is like a canary. She has no special charm other than good looks. She was reborn and built such a big career. In the end, she got a canary and became very old

The author is a great philanthropist. It is very suitable for him to be his boss. He will make everyone the richest man by working on his own. I wish everyone happiness. This is great.

That's awesome, even 523 can be washed. It's so awesome. Changshengtian will reserve a seat for you.

You're not that violent, but you're not entertaining at all.

So well written! It's understandable that celebrities from before I met them would have the idea of ​​chasing stars, and they would do some strange things! I got my first pot of gold from writing a novel, and then I made a short film and won another award and sold it for $_$. 👀The author has replied and commented. It is purely a director's article and does not engage in investment... Where can you go if you are a great director?

The writing is very good, and the descriptions in some directors' professional language will make readers feel more immersed in it. However, there is a slight flaw, which is that the year issue may make experienced readers of China Entertainment confused. This is the box office of movies around 2000. It does not mean that if you make a good movie or do a good job in publicity, the box office will exceed 100 million. Book friends who are familiar with the development of China Entertainment should know that around 2000, there were only more than 1,800 movie screens in the country, 70% of which were distributed in big cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, and the cinema equipment was old. This is why there was such a sensation after the release of Heroes in 2002. First, it made capital aware of the potential of the domestic film market, and then it was willing to spend money to increase the number of big screens and update equipment; second, it made the country recognize the development prospects of the film market and relax its policies. I can't stand it until halfway through. The American film company's description is really difficult. At this stage, a $100 million production launched in 2003 is a bit magical. The author might use today's $100 million to measure the large-scale production at that time. Isn't it okay for you, Xiao Chen, to make a hit with a B-category mid-level production and make a fortune in silence? Do you think that all the big six in Hollywood are blind? Won't we work together to strangle you?

A very good domestic entertainment novel, why is the rating so low?