Chess Cultivation: The Elephant Has No Form

Chess is divided into chess theory and chess strength. The understanding and application of piece strength is the basis of chess strength. The clear understanding of the first move and the second move is the basis of chess theory. This book breaks down the concept of initiative and explains it to readers. It is a unique chess book. What is the basis for exchanging one son for three first? Here is an explanation. The son gains power because of his position, and he kills because of his power. The movements of the sons are different, and the same sons have different fates. The first move is understood narrowly, and catching and killing is the first move. In a broad sense, the advance dispatch of the first mover's force belongs to the category of accelerating the general's pace to gain the initiative, which can be regarded as a strategic first move. Moving first is not the first move, because taking the first step can advance to the general. This is true, but it is not the first move. Here you can distinguish the difference between going first and going first. With this distinction, we have a further understanding of initiative and initiative. The first step of the red team's opening is proactive because it can take the initiative, but it is not certain whether this initiative will turn into the first move. In a narrow sense, if you move first and make the opponent passive, you will take the initiative. Here, since the red side has the initiative in the first step of the game but fails to grasp this initiative and does not take the initiative, there is still a difference between taking the initiative and taking the initiative. Taking the initiative does not mean taking the initiative. Taking the initiative belongs to the current situation, but taking the initiative belongs to further grasping the initiative and forming the first move. Because there is no such clear understanding, the first step in chess has always been called the first move, and there is no distinction between the first move and the first move. This is one of the highlights of this book. What is the reason for winning in chess? Is it possible to win only if the opponent makes a mistake? Zi is the source of power, and its position creates potential. The relationship between victory and Zi and potential is that potential determines victory or defeat, and Zi determines potential. That is to say, the relationship between Zi and victory is not directly decisive. Don't win because of more power, don't lose because of less power, don't win because of equal power. Because the sub-force determines the potential, and the potential determines the outcome, we cannot directly say that the sub-force directly determines the outcome. This is potential determinism, not sub-force determinism. Sub-power becomes potential, but sub-power is not all of potential. It cannot be said that the situation is superior just because there are more pieces of force, and it cannot be said that the situation is inferior just because the strength of the pieces is small. The specific situation depends on the position of the sub-force.