Historical Inventory: Romantic Figures Through the Ages

Your wife writes so well [sending heart] [sending heart] sending flowers🌸🌸🌸 Especially Lao Zhu and Judy After reading a lot of articles, Lao Zhu screamed and killed Judy when he heard that she was rebelling. It seemed that Zhu Biao was the only one. Judy immediately knelt down and cried bitterly. She said that she would always be the general who conquered the north. She was speechless [awkward laugh] [awkward laugh] At that time, so many vassal kings were deposed, but he was the only one who dared to "seek power and usurp the throne." What's more, the sky said that he would be the emperor in the future, and he did a good job, so how could he not have ambitions. Lao Zhu is the emperor. It has been clearly stated on the sky that Zhu Di has done a good job and Yongle is prosperous. Does he dare to bet on the future of the Ming Dynasty or let Zhu Biao take the throne? Let's not talk about whether the hurdle of illness and death can be overcome, but if you survive, can you do better than Zhu Di? Some articles write that Zhu Biao was a particularly powerful emperor, and that he was the emperor through the ages. When you look at the content, you can see that they are all achievements made by Yongle in history [making a face]

The author's writing style is very good, especially when describing the emperor, he writes very vividly in just a few sentences. He also respects historical facts and does not write a brainwashing package for marketing accounts. Especially when writing about Zhu Di, he writes about Zhu Di's ambition. It is not like in many articles where Zhu Yuanzhang always beats Zhu Di. With such an emperor's son, Lao Zhu should be happy that there is a successor to the Ming Dynasty instead of always thinking about Zhu Biao. He is first and foremost an emperor who puts the world first. The most important thing is to have a good heir. He is not like an old father. He must have a son. Emperors are all political creatures.

I read a lot of reviews of Zhu Di, and most of them were due to luck and Nanjing. Only two approved it, saying that he relied on strength and ability, as well as governing the country. As for Zhu Gaochi, hehe, he promoted literati, and he and Zhu Zhanji were responsible for the disasters in civil engineering [sneaky laugh] [sneaky laugh] [sneaky laugh]. It wasn't relying on strong winds and luck. Looking at the results of the generals who attacked Zhu Di, Zhu Yunqi finally moved the imperial tomb guards before he realized that he had been cheated, so he recognized two books. Zhu Di was really good at defeating them. This one [laughing][laughing][laughing]

Zhu Di is so awesome. So many people have been brainwashed and brag about Zhu Di without any brains.

Zhu Di's writing in this article is very good, unlike other articles. In fact, I have read a lot of articles about taking stock of Zhu Di. Well, there are quite a few, but Zhu Di is generally written in a way that is a bit silly and dull. This one is very good. It describes Zhu Di's courage, bravery and talent. [Sending Hearts] And the authenticity of this article is relatively good. I have read many articles saying that most of the credit for Zhu Di's success in Fengtian was due to Li Jinglong. This article truly describes Zhu Di's talent and courage ヽ(*⌒∇⌒*)ﾉ.

This book is relatively well-founded, and the author has actually researched the information. It is not like most other Tianmu texts, where the author writes blindly, and the plots of unofficial brainwashing packages, rumors, TV series, and novels are all over the place, making people unable to stand it and marveling at the author's ignorance. It can only be said that there is no harm without comparison. Then there is the distribution of barrage and marquee content. This book mainly focuses on the marquee content. There are no messy barrage, nor does it allow too many barrage to overwhelm the main content, which is commendable. But there are still some shortcomings. Here are two suggestions: 1. This book adopts the heroic view of history, not the people's view of history as mentioned by the author. It is recommended that the author understand the real people's view of history. Then, revise the introduction and don't make false propaganda. In fact, the novel is written with a heroic view of history and is very interesting. There is no need to think that this is a bad thing, and there is no need to make false propaganda. 2. It is recommended that the author explain more in some places, because many readers do not understand history and may confuse things. For example, the three expeditions were Goguryeo (one tone) and Li (li, two tone). Goguryeo was originally called Goguryeo ("Book of the Later Han Dynasty" was called "Goguryeo"). It was an ancient nation living in the northeastern region at first. Later, in the second year of Emperor Jianzhao of the Han Yuan Dynasty, Zhu Meng from Fuyu was The country was founded in Goguryeo County of Xuantu County, so it was called "Goguryeo"), and it was only renamed "Goryeo" in the Southern and Northern Dynasties. Therefore, it is no problem to say that it was the Three Conquests of Goguryeo. However, in order to distinguish Gao's Goguryeo from the later Wang's Goryeo, historians generally call it "Goguryeo". So since the author used Goryeo instead of Goguryeo or Goryeo, he should explain a few more sentences. In the end, these are just suggestions. I'm not a professional, just a history buff, and I don't know much. The author's writing is very good and worthy of encouragement. Come on! I hope the author can write better and better! I hope this book will be popular, it is really good among similar types of books. Big cheers for the author↖(^ω^)↗

The chapter on Zhu Di is well written, because when Tomato wrote about Zhu Di, there were too many unofficial rumors and a set of stereotyped books about Zhu Di being beaten. I was tired of reading it, so I have to support a book that is a brainwashing package. Otherwise, there will be no more books, so I have to give it five stars.

"It's really strange. Some people always like to excuse the foolish emperors who have sealed the final verdict in history, but they fabricate new black spots about the wise emperors out of thin air for no reason, and then think that they are the only ones in the world who are sober." Just this sentence! ! !

It's very interesting to write. I've only read five chapters. It's really about popularizing history in science. It uses humorous language. I'm already addicted. It's much better than those ancient people who kept talking about the sky and talked about the word count.

This book is really good. There is no brainwashing package by Zhu Di and there is no theory about Jing Nan. It writes about the difficulties of Zhu Di's Jing Nan in history. When people nowadays talk about Zhu Di, they think that peace depends entirely on military commanders releasing water, and civil governance all depends on sons. These brainwashing packages are too outrageous. In order to belittle Zhu Di, they crazily belittled Li Jinglong, and the outrageous rumors about releasing water from Baigou River to deliver supplies. You must know that the Central Army died in this battle. The military commanders included Zhai Neng, his son, and Yu Tongyuan. These people all had meritorious deeds. How could it be possible for Zhu Di to be beheaded by Zhu Di at Baigou River in order to support Zhu Di? Moreover, the battle of Baigou River was so brutal. How could Li Jinglong have most of his army wiped out in order to support Zhu Di. You must know that Li Jinglong had made great achievements before this, and he was already a prince, and he and Zhu Di could not be crowned kings. Moreover, Li Jinglong was involved in the incidents of the vassal kings who were eliminated before this. How could he dare to let go? Then there is Geng Bingwen, who is said to have defended the city until Zhu Di doubted his life. However, he was beheaded by Zhu Di in his first confrontation with Zhending (Mu Sheng's epitaph). There is no such thing as defending the city until Zhu Di doubted his life. There is another He Fu. He was obviously appointed by Zhu Yuanzhang based on merit. He had never lost before the Jingnan. As a result, all his online achievements were grafted to Sheng Yong. As the coach of Lingbi, he has no sense of existence at all. The battle of Lingbi was fought by Xu Huizu. How Fu? Who is this? Is there such a good person in history?

To me, the writing is actually very good, and it is more in line with historical facts, unlike some of the articles I read, which use interpretations, TV series and unofficial history as official history, which makes me want to criticize people. It's just that the length of history is too long. Whether it's barrage comments or the reflections of ancient people, there are so few. I always feel that there are unfinished words, and I feel empty after reading it. But come on author! ! ! Keep producing excellent articles! ! !

I watched the latest one in one go, overall it's good, the point of view is fairly objective, the mass view of history, the three views are in harmony and it looks great! The shortcoming is that the previous part of the inventory of emperors has too much content and too little reaction. When it comes to the lyricist part, the proportion seems to be okay. I hope the characters will have more reactions [Blow kiss]

Did you learn from [Telling Zhu Yuanzhang about Zhu Di's Rebellion]?

Although it has flaws, it's still fair. Give 5 stars for encouragement. If you encounter abstractions like Yang Guang or Liu Ziye, feel free to scold them boldly. There will be a great scholar who will debate the scriptures for you [laughs]

Tied, full score! ! ! The author is very careful not to collapse! ! ! The author has literary talent! ! ! The characters in the novel are courageous! ! ! ! In that era, how could a bold person be afraid just because he would fail in the future? What joy is there in life, and nothing fearful in death!

Very good. The description of Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhu Di in the Ming Dynasty is like an emperor.

(Bottom middle) 7 points, mark,,,,,, Ordinary, the format is a bit worse. ─────────────────── Rating of the novel: ①Shangshang (a good book that suits my taste very well, five stars/10 points+) ②Superior (recognized by everyone as a good book, with more than 1,000 updates, five stars/10 points) ③Shang Xia (logically self-consistent & a good book that I don't like, five stars/9 points) ④Above average (a good book in the conventional sense, five stars/8 points) ⑤Medium (cheated, no evaluation, three stars/one point minus) ⑥Mid-to-lower (general, three stars/6 points & four stars/7 points) ⑦Bottom and top (major defects, one star/2 points & three stars/4 points) ⑧Inferior (tasteless, two stars/0 points) ⑨Xiaxia (revenge against society, two stars/negative points)

Give me more reactions from historical figures.

It's beautiful, especially the one about Li Shimin. I cried several times😭

Very well written, looking forward to the follow-up! [Laughs] And the writing of Piggy and Judy is also very good.

(*´I`*) I enjoyed reading Datang. The writing is well-founded and the language is beautiful.

Great, come on, it's well written, very special, I like it very much. Don't make it short, okay? If you really don't have time, just write it slowly, but finish it, okay? [Send heart][Send heart][Send heart]

Full marks 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯, it's great, I read it in one go, keep it up! I will keep watching

It gets rid of some brainwashing kits and writes in detail and more closely to history, but it also reduces the fun. Maybe that's why fewer people read it.

It objectively describes Lao Zhu and his son. You must like it.

Give five-star support It's been half an hour, it's well written and objective enough [Like]

It's beautiful, thank you to the author!

Zhu Biao wrote that part very well.

Come on, come on, come on, come on, come on, come on!

Finally I read an objective article about Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. He is a great talent and has good reviews.