Repeated Travel Through the Siheyuan

I have read more than 480 chapters. The writing is very good and the logic is very strong. It can be seen that the author has checked a lot of information. I have been reading novels for decades, and this is the first time I have read so many first-person books. The story is told in the way that the heroine writes a diary. There is no description of "I" being as beautiful as a fairy. The writing is good. But the story I'm reading now is a prequel to the prequel of "Siheyuan". The heroine is not involved in it. She is just a camera. Personally, I don't like this kind of story very much. I still like the kind of cool stories. I finished watching it and skipped the world I wasn't interested in. Overall four stars.

The author's writing is good, and the first story's criticism of the characters and family backgrounds of the male and female protagonists in the original book is interesting and reasonable. For the first story, if you don't write a finale, why bother writing an alternative eunuch story? In the story of The True and False Daughter of the Age, the female protagonist changed her gender to a male, and she also took a wife herself and gave birth to two children, two sons and one daughter. It's quite outrageous, so is this a lily article or a sexual intercourse article?

It's a really interesting book, mainly because of its rich imagination and the author's strong logical ability. There are no logical flaws in the setting.

The first-person diary style gives readers the first impression that it is unreliable. Unexpectedly, this novel is really good. It's rare to have a wide-open mind and basically justify your own explanations, with online logic. The research on the 1950s and 1960s is also relatively in-depth, which is very different from most stereotyped descriptions of "eras".

I started reading this novel after reading reviews that said it was good. It is indeed good. In the past, when I saw a first-person novel, I just stopped reading it. I didn't expect that this novel would keep me interested and read it with gusto.

It is a very special book. This is the first time I have read a novel written in the form of a diary. I originally rated it very low and thought it was not good to read. Who knew that the content is very realistic, and the logical thinking and many things that I had not understood before were smoothed out!

This is the first first-person novel I've read that I didn't dislike. There is no such awkward feeling. I have also read other first-person novels, and it feels like there is a language barrier. This one is really different. Pretty good. [Laugh]

Is the author the one from 50 Insights?

This book is so good ~ you need to use your brain to read it.

It's a very good book. It's a pity that the previous book was so good. The author is very knowledgeable about many situations in the last century, and it's rare that he's not a crooked author.

It was very enjoyable to watch, I had a good outlook on things, I wasn't used to the characters in the plot, and there were no bloody plots.

The historical research is very detailed, many details are supported by detailed arguments, and every little story about the courtyard can be justified. It is a really good work. The low score may be because most of this is written in a diary-memoir-like format. It is estimated that many people cannot accept this format.

The only one caught up in the first-person book. The logic is very strong, the complaints are interesting, and the story is also good.

Love is beyond words, five-star praise.

Beautiful, very imaginative

Taking a quick look at the flowers, it looks good at first glance

Good-looking, really good-looking

Interesting and beautiful!

The heroine's path to immortality.

Good angle, looks okay

The first person version is still quite uncomfortable, but this is the first time I have read this diary-style novel and I am not too offended by it.

Absolutely a really good book (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)👍

This is the first time I've seen a diary-style novel [laughing] and it's quite interesting✿✿ヽ(°▽°)ノ✿

Why is this book rated so low? Personally, I think a score of at least 9 points is appropriate. It's a joy to watch!

The writing is quite good, but the first person narrative has never been rated highly, and it is no longer popular now.

This author is the best, posting someone else's diary and saying it was written by her, [laughs]

The logic is clear and the story is novel. It's quite interesting, but the rating is on the low side.

It's very interesting to read, although it's a bit brain-burning. The author uses the form of a diary to describe the story and it's very meaningful. Among them, the one in front of the Siheyuan left the deepest impression on me.

I really like it. I'm nagging about why there are so many courtyard houses. I saw the first one and skipped all the ones after it.

What a treasure book, very beautiful