Slow pace + strong logic + all members are normal people.
I tried writing a synopsis of the story, but deleted it again.
Just like a frog that suddenly jumped out of the water, if you want to explain why it jumped out of the water and what its purpose is, of course it is possible. Just like dissecting a frog, you understand the motive of the frog jumping out of the water.
But the frog died too.
Storytelling is like that.
The story is about a group of people searching for themselves.
It's not an update mode for online articles because the outline has already been thought out and the number of words in each chapter will not be too uniform. Basically, there will be no lag, but the update will be very slow because I am very stupid.
But it wasn't until I finished writing the outline that I discovered that I could neither define love nor myself, so I could only start with indirections and let readers define it. After all, there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people. My personal one-sided view is not enough to support this story. Again, characters always have their own thoughts. I can't use rigid labels to summarize the specifics. I can only think for myself. Don't be too credulous in the colloquial expressions of the characters in the work itself.
