When Dingman first changed his house, he never expected that the strange and mysterious new landlord would turn out to be his unforgettable "classmate" from college.
What's even more bizarre is that the rental contract issued to her by the landlord actually included an agreement to pretend to be a couple, which violated public order and morals. She also made her, who had always believed in honesty and trustworthiness as the highest principle of life, and who should have justly rejected this unreasonable treaty, reached an agreement with this "law-illiterate" landlord by accident.
The star-studded life of a trainee lawyer, because of the company of this virtuous landlord who can be called an off-site think tank, gradually made her addicted to it and couldn't extricate herself. When the contract period was about to expire, she was merciful and willing to continue to perform the contract. Unexpectedly, the landlord who fed her every day unilaterally broke the contract and left without saying goodbye again.
Should we recapture this dishonest person and continue to perform the contract, or should we terminate the contract? Dingman, who has handled hundreds of civil disputes, was unable to resolve even the most basic contract issues for the first time.
Until the landlord appeared again and said to her in an unclear way: "Goodbye is not fate, it is a long-planned accident." Ding Man finally understood that as a little trainee lawyer, how could he not know how to play with the law like the landlord of Party A.
