The Official History Is Wilder Than the Unofficial Tales, and Li Shimin Is Losing It

This book is really full of useful information. The author is a big shot in the history department. He used to know that Emperor Xin was hacked, and he also knew some of Emperor Xin's achievements, such as liberating slaves, but he only knew a rough idea. The author wrote it in too much detail, and there are historical records or archaeological documents to support it. Unlike those written by Yun Shuiwen, this book has too much useful information. My heart was racing, especially when I learned some historical facts that I had never understood before, such as the invasion of the Aryans. To be honest, I had never heard of it before. I had often seen reviews or novels advocating about the Qin Dynasty. What would happen if the collision between ancient Rome and the Qin Dynasty happened? There was a theory that what would happen if Western countries invaded historical powers such as the Qin, Han, and Tang Dynasties? But few people know that Western countries actually invaded ancient China in history. The Aryans, a nation that destroyed the world's three major ancient civilizations, invaded the Shang Dynasty, which was ruled by Wu Ding at that time, and were defeated by Fuhao. This incident has a lot of controversy on the Internet, but the author supports this incident from many angles. Regardless of whether it is true or not, at least the author writes in detail and objectively. This novel is really wonderful, and it shouldn't be rated so low. After reading this novel, and looking at other novels with the same theme, I feel that those novels are all written by Yun, and their writing is too ordinary. In comparison, this one can be regarded as a god.

It is very well written👍. The five-star review has made more people read this good article. After reading this article, I realized that the Zhou Dynasty was basically a group of newborn kings, and the Shang Dynasty was basically a group of sage and sage kings. I was not familiar with the history at that time. I guess the Shang Dynasty of the sage and sage kings must have defeated the newborn Zhou Dynasty.

It can be seen that the author has put a lot of effort into it. It is unique in the inventory article. Starting from the Shang Dynasty, it is also a historical blind spot for many people. There are many viewpoints that subvert cognition, some of which I know, and some of which are the first time I have seen it. After reading the comment area, I just want to say that it can be seen from the article that the author is talking about the good things about the Shang Dynasty and a lot about the bad things about the Zhou Dynasty. However, it is undeniable that historical evaluation itself is very subjective. Everyone knows that the Zhou Dynasty is too good, and it is not inferior to the author. He is just talking about things other than the well-known good things. Wouldn't it be interesting to have more different opinions? I feel that it is very well written. Although some of the settings feel a bit awkward and there are some inappropriate wordings, the flaws are not hidden and it is very good among similar articles. A small suggestion to the author is that he can list the reference papers in this chapter and use facts to prove it. There should be fewer negative reviews. You can also give us some popular science and go to CNKI to check it yourself.

It's a good book. I hope the author can keep writing until the Republic of China. He should take his time and don't rush or skip dynasties. I see a lot of people saying that the author is talking nonsense and giving low marks. What I want to say is that you can read the author's book as the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. You can see for yourself how outrageous it is compared to the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. The author's reasoning is much more reasonable [face covering]. According to the official history, the Shang Dynasty, Zhou Dynasty and various forces seemed to be fighting like fools, and there was a sense of fragmentation in various places. I prefer this kind of conspiracy and intrigue, which feels more real. This is originally a novel, and there is a lot of interesting information in it. I hope the book will not enter a dark room, and I wish the author's data will get better and better. [Top post][top post][top post]

Super good-looking, highly recommended, starting with Wu Ding and Women's Hao. From the perspective of slaves, Emperor Xin was more kind than King Wu of Zhou. It talked about what kind of story Sima Qian really wanted to express when he wrote the "Fenghuo Opera". It is said that the descendants of the survivors of the Shang Dynasty established the later Great Qin. The Qin people did not eat a grain of Zhou rice. They were not a vassal state of Zhou, but on the same status. The ancestors of Qin obtained fiefs for the Zhou emperor to herd horses. This is just a misinterpretation. This is not the true history. It really changed my view of history.

Yes, the author's articles are full of useful information, and I learned a lot of knowledge. I originally thought that I had read no less than a hundred historical novels, and there was nothing I didn't know. After reading the author's book, I felt that I was ignorant [face covering] [face covering] [face covering], so I must give it a five-star rating!

Clear organization and well-founded opinions! The most amazing article in popular science history! ! ! There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people, and there are countless years of history in history books. Therefore, every time I read a historical article, whether popular science or time travel, there will always be countless people arguing in the comments. It is difficult to distinguish between superior and inferior, and it is difficult to distinguish true from false. The strange thing about this book is that it has been argued by countless people and failed to win. The arguments are clear, consistent with the background, consistent with human nature, the logical chain is complete, the reasoning is smooth, and consistent with social development. The arguments are well-documented and credible. The history books, which used to be strange and full of contradictions, have become smoother and smoother. The ancients no longer make people feel stupid and ignorant, but their true wisdom has a soul. The best article in popular science history! ! ! I saw a lot of low scores, one or two points, but they all just said a few words about this and that, and I couldn't bear to say a few more words to talk about the arguments and the argumentation process. I don't care, I don't care, you are wrong. It's really funny. It's quite a kind of pride that the whole world is drunk and I am alone [laughing][laughing][laughing][laughing]

This book is really good, rich in content, and the evaluation is very objective. The author has a multi-faceted understanding of the real history, rather than simply understanding the surface from textbooks and short videos from marketing accounts. He also writes in more detail, and maintains a better balance of evaluations between men and women. There are many writings of the same type. From the female perspective, it is easy to be too exaggerated and pretentious. From the male perspective, it is easy to stereotype, arrogant and trample female characters. The focused historical content is suspended in the flow of short videos. There are too many errors, too much subjectivity, fragmentation or too short-sightedness. This book is very balanced and very comfortable to read, but the author writes very carefully, so the battle line of this book is probably going to be very long.

The quality is very good, but some characters do not fit his ideas at the time, and as we all know, there are many places in historical texts that are highly subjective to the author. It's a bit of a headache to read, mainly because of the part about Liu Bang and Lu Pheasant, which doesn't fit the situation. The article contains the author's strong subjective ideas.

The author deeply mines various historical materials to corroborate each other and adds his own independent thinking. The author made me understand the doubts I had about historical stories since I was a child, such as the stigmatization of the beacon fire opera by princes just to win praise, the wisdom of King Zhou of Shang, the tragic days of his descendants after Boyikao's death, and the shamelessness of Ji Chang, etc. The history written by the author makes me truly believe in the wisdom of the ancients. The author treats me as a wise person and digs deep into history instead of just throwing history in my face. He or she does not record history and add his or her own emotional speculations like a certain Sima. In short, love it. Author, you are a different kind of firework.