The Ming Conspiracy Theory Was Exposed at the Beginning, and Lao Zhu Broke His Defense

It's pretty good. It's not mindless to brag about Zhu Yuanzhang. I'll give him five stars for criticizing Zhu Di. The more Zhu Yuanzhang gets to know him, the less he likes him. The conspiracy theories are also very well written. They are all conspiracy theories. There is no need to say anything about whitewashing. It is just a matter of looking at it from a different angle. We don't know what history is like.

I have to say that after reading so many inventory novels, this is the first time I see such a tough little Zhu Di. I dare to scold Zhu Chongba for being a stinky beggar [laughing and crying]

I like this book because I am also a supporter of the Ming Dynasty conspiracy theory. There are so many inconsistencies. Zhu Yuanzhang, Zhu Di, Zhu Zhanji, Zhu Qizhen really never thought about it~ But Zhu Gaochi, Zhu Qiyu, Zhu Jianshen, Zhu Houzhao, Zhu Houcong, Zhu Yijun, Zhu Youxiao, etc., No matter how you look at the "Red Pill Case", "The Case of the Fence Attack" and the "Relocation of the Palace Case", there is no problem, right? Isn't there anyone who hasn't heard of "a chivalrous man uses force to break the law"? And the previous sentence of this sentence is "Confucianism and literature corrupt the law." Have many people heard of it? Ever wonder why? These people who engage in politics are too dirty-minded. The history of the Ming Dynasty is really tiring to read~

The concept is very novel. There are too many problems in the Ming Dynasty. It should be mixed with problems from other dynasties. But after the Ming Dynasty, I can't stand it anymore.

Very beautiful, it's my favorite Emperor Yongle [laughing][laughing][laughing] You're careless. You shouldn't have given it five stars. Emperor Yongle liked this, but then he completely started talking nonsense. He actually got scared and started.

Very good, according to the pace of the book. This book roughly goes through the official history of each dynasty based on history, but it also touches on "conspiracy theories." After all, in the memoirs of modern successful people, only big events are true, and all the details are made with beauty and face-lifting special effects at their maximum. What about history? Putting out opinions through "conspiracy theories" and then supporting them by interest groups behind this line, maybe history is like this, and we cannot rule out that some of them are too wild. But the dynasties seen through different perspectives are more fleshed out. It is best to go through most of the dynasties through this rhythm, and then roughly go through European history, and finally show all aspects of modern society.

At first, I felt that this kind of canopy was very poisonous and discouraging, but later I patched it up and it felt a bit interesting. I have read a lot of conspiracy theories about the Ming Dynasty. This is the first time I have read about conspiracy theories about the Northern Song Dynasty. Only with an extra perspective can I understand why it is always a matter of life and death to control Douzhan. No wonder some people always say that the Song Dynasty was the heyday of economic and cultural development in ancient China, but I have always felt that Jingkang was weak and the Song Dynasty achieved nothing but wealth. Is the founding of the Song Dynasty by Zhao Kuangyin also considered a Renaissance in our East? [Think]

The subject matter is good, and the writing is more specific. It would be better if the grading situation uses a hundred-point system for each question. The main reason is that the author's comments are very good, and he compares both the pros and cons. The good ones are not mentioned in a single word, and the bad ones are not mentioned. There is no subjective affirmation of the historical puzzle. I dug a hole and let everyone discover the argument on their own. Anyway, the author has put the blame away. The biggest fear of writing this kind of article is to bring too much thought to yourself. After all, everyone has different ideas. Let's talk about the good and bad, and in the end you will get the most suitable recognition.

History is like a little girl who can be dressed up by others. The emperor who left an infamy throughout the ages may not be a faint emperor, but may be a wise emperor who just violated the interests of the scholar-bureaucrats. It is self-evident how the scholar-bureaucrats who write history books will write.

There are details and conclusive evidence. If it is supported from the perspective of human nature, it seems that this is the historical truth.

The angle is unique and refreshing. It is the first time to look at the history of the Ming Dynasty from this perspective, especially the analysis of Zhu Qizhen. Although there are conspiracy theories, it is a novel after all, and it is very interesting to be exposed to different viewpoints! Broaden horizons

It can be seen that the author has thought about his own opinions. As for whether it is right or not, it is a matter of opinion. Moreover, he really checked the information and did not just find some jokes and TV series. For this reason, I have to give it 5 stars.

Good, good, very good! Although there are flaws in some places, this is a truly in-depth study of the historical sky inventory, told from different angles, not copying an original text from a history book, or from a short video or history that I don't know where to learn, or even some using movies and TV dramas as history. It is really ridiculous and speechless [laughing and crying] It would be better if the dynasties, characters and people included in the inventory of the conspiracy theory were described. And didn't Sun Chuanting be released earlier? Why are you still in jail?

Full marks, this book by the author has a big difference from other books of the same type. In this book, you can see the subversion of the short videos in the past, which makes people understand one thing. Don't blindly believe what is written in history books, but think for yourself.

First, this is a novel. Second, if history is written by people, it may be concealed. Third, I enjoyed watching it. Fourth, I am not a history student and I don't read history. The only way is through TV movies and novels. This novel is thought-provoking. What you come into contact with may not necessarily be what you understand. It may also be someone else who lets you know. I don't care whether what the author writes is true or false. But I feel it makes sense. In the end this is just my own opinion as for others you can have your own opinion but please don't convince me to agree with your opinion. Because I'm not trying to convince you of my point of view. Finally, give the author a thumbs up. Not enough.

Very good, it broadens your horizons. History cannot be generalized. It should be considered slowly and thoughtfully.

Well, the author has a very deep and detailed understanding of history. He has both official and unofficial history, as well as a lot of documents. It can be regarded as a quite novel historical science article.

Interesting ideas. Even though I don't understand history, I enjoyed watching it. Don't think it's slow. Do you think it's too slow to finish dozens of chapters of a dynasty? Too impetuous, this is not a brainless article

666, I really dare to write. The author gives you a thumbs up [like]. It's so awesome. Especially the part where Zhu Di and Zhu Biao fight Zhu Yuanzhang is so 666, it's a lot of fun.

What I read about the Ming Dynasty really breaks my guard. I feel that the author has really studied the history of the Ming Dynasty very deeply. I guess many people will say that the author is looking for unofficial history. But one thing is that the emperors of the Ming Dynasty did have short lifespans. Although the life span of ancient times is generally not as long as modern times, the Ming Dynasty seems to be particularly short-lived. History is written by people, and many things will be deliberately erased or modified, as well as humanistic worship, causing various inaccuracies to appear in historical documents. The author's creation mainly uses the method of discussing deeds regardless of the heart in the law, and finds many documents to support his views. This makes the author's novel closer to the historical truth. I don't care how historians praise or belittle it. I only read it based on the historians' records of what the emperors did and based on actual maps. There is a video blogger who made a good video. To view history, you need to combine it with a map, not just text.

Five-star praise, self-consistent logic, well-founded, and subversive of cognition. The hustle and bustle in the world is all for benefit, and all is for benefit. Substituting conspiracy theories for dialectics, the truth about the Song and Ming dynasties is tenable. There is no whitewashing. In ordinary workplaces, there are rumors, performance grabs, backdoors, and human resources departments eavesdropping on severance compensation, leading people to directly go to labor arbitration, let alone the highest palace of scheming. Support the author, hope the update will not be interrupted, and hope it will be completed.

It's well written, and I feel like this is real history. In a country as developed as the Song Dynasty, how could anyone become an emperor and be mediocre? In particular, the royal family was born from a fusion of excellent genes, and received the best education since childhood, with the best food, clothing, housing and transportation. How could it be possible to cultivate a foolish king? The same was true in the Ming Dynasty

It is a relatively new historical novel, with a rich reserve of literary and historical knowledge. The reviews are quite fair. I won't discuss right or wrong, just a matter of opinion.

It is very interesting. This book tells history from another perspective and allows us to look at history from a dialectical perspective. The history of a dynasty should be viewed from multiple angles and argued together in multiple history books. Rather than just recognizing the history books of this dynasty, we don't know how much personal emotion and writing style there is in a history book.

I've read Chapter 19. Unofficial history is the mainstream. You can read it when you don't have any books. 😁😁😁

Good guy, it's just like storytelling. I wonder why I'm reading so slowly. When I opened the table of contents, I saw that there are at least one chapter of 5,000 words and a maximum of nearly 10,000 words. You are so sincere, the author. You put others' 2,000 to 3,000 chapters (I can read hundreds of chapters in four hours) but here I read seventy chapters if I looked carefully.

I really feel that it tells a lot of truths that are not revealed in many historical novels. It is really interesting. It quotes a lot of real historical materials and feels very reliable. Unfortunately, it has been discontinued now. If there is no way to continue updating, at least recommend to me more works that subvert the history I knew before, including the truth about Yue Fei's death and the Tumu Fort Incident.

Among so many articles on history, this one allowed me to see a different perspective. Different opinions. Moreover, these perspectives and insights also have their origins. Maybe it was there before and I didn't notice it. The "change" of Zhu Qizhen's Tumu Fortress and the latest chapter on Yue Wumu

Okay, okay, I like it, [Like][Like][Like][Send heart][Send heart][Send heart] Please update more, and those who don't like it, please don't fight. If you don't like it, just leave. Don't come to me to look for presence. It's your business if you don't like it. I just like it.

Sure enough, history must be understood with the addition of politics [laughing][laughing][laughing]