Exposing the Ming Dynasty Conspiracy Theory from the Start: Zhu Yuanzhang Loses It

It's pretty good. It's not mindless to brag about Zhu Yuanzhang. I'll give him five stars for criticizing Zhu Di. The more Zhu Yuanzhang gets to know him, the less he likes him. The conspiracy theories are also very well written. They are all conspiracy theories. There is no need to say anything about whitewashing. It is just a matter of looking at it from a different angle. We don't know what history is like.

I like this book because I am also a supporter of the Ming Dynasty conspiracy theory. There are so many inconsistencies. Zhu Yuanzhang, Zhu Di, Zhu Zhanji, Zhu Qizhen really never thought about it~ But Zhu Gaochi, Zhu Qiyu, Zhu Jianshen, Zhu Houzhao, Zhu Houcong, Zhu Yijun, Zhu Youxiao, etc., No matter how you look at the "Red Pill Case", "The Case of the Fence Attack" and the "Relocation of the Palace Case", there is no problem, right? Isn't there anyone who hasn't heard of "a chivalrous man uses force to break the law"? And the previous sentence of this sentence is "Confucianism and literature corrupt the law." Have many people heard of it? Ever wonder why? These people who engage in politics are too dirty-minded. The history of the Ming Dynasty is really tiring to read~

I have to say that after reading so many inventory novels, this is the first time I see such a tough little Zhu Di. I dare to scold Zhu Chongba for being a stinky beggar [laughing and crying]

The concept is very novel. There are too many problems in the Ming Dynasty. It should be mixed with problems from other dynasties. But after the Ming Dynasty, I can't stand it anymore.

Very beautiful, it's my favorite Emperor Yongle [laughing][laughing][laughing] You're careless. You shouldn't have given it five stars. Emperor Yongle liked this, but then he completely started talking nonsense. He actually got scared and started.

Very good, according to the pace of the book. This book roughly goes through the official history of each dynasty based on history, but it also touches on "conspiracy theories." After all, in the memoirs of modern successful people, only big events are true, and all the details are made with beauty and face-lifting special effects at their maximum. What about history? Putting out opinions through "conspiracy theories" and then supporting them by interest groups behind this line, maybe history is like this, and we cannot rule out that some of them are too wild. But the dynasties seen through different perspectives are more fleshed out. It is best to go through most of the dynasties through this rhythm, and then roughly go through European history, and finally show all aspects of modern society.

At first, I felt that this kind of canopy was very poisonous and discouraging, but later I patched it up and it felt a bit interesting. I have read a lot of conspiracy theories about the Ming Dynasty. This is the first time I have read about conspiracy theories about the Northern Song Dynasty. Only with an extra perspective can I understand why it is always a matter of life and death to control Douzhan. No wonder some people always say that the Song Dynasty was the heyday of economic and cultural development in ancient China, but I have always felt that Jingkang was weak and the Song Dynasty achieved nothing but wealth. Is the founding of the Song Dynasty by Zhao Kuangyin also considered a Renaissance in our East? [Think]

The subject matter is good, and the writing is more specific. It would be better if the grading situation uses a hundred-point system for each question. The main reason is that the author's comments are very good, and he compares both the pros and cons. The good ones are not mentioned in a single word, and the bad ones are not mentioned. There is no subjective affirmation of the historical puzzle. I dug a hole and let everyone discover the argument on their own. Anyway, the author has put the blame away. The biggest fear of writing this kind of article is to bring too much thought to yourself. After all, everyone has different ideas. Let's talk about the good and bad, and in the end you will get the most suitable recognition.

History is like a little girl who can be dressed up by others. The emperor who left an infamy throughout the ages may not be a faint emperor, but may be a wise emperor who just violated the interests of the scholar-bureaucrats. It is self-evident how the scholar-bureaucrats who write history books will write.

There are details and conclusive evidence. If it is supported from the perspective of human nature, it seems that this is the historical truth.