Harry Potter Is Too Dark, Fairy Tales Are All Lies

It's so good-looking, it's so damn good-looking, and the logic of the plot is fully explained in the end. Voldemort is a talented rookie in the academic circle. The old-school leader Dumbledore must put on airs, exclude him, squeeze him out of the circle, and then there will be so many bad things.

The multi-person perspective changes to the first person, similar to a group portrait. It was a bit unfamiliar at first, but the interpretation angle and background structure are really amazing. I have never seen this type. It is rare and reads quite smoothly. There are more psychological descriptions in the first person, just like different people chattering about doing their own things. It is very cute. And the title of this book almost made me miss it. I suggest changing the name hahaha. Looking forward to the plot of them officially going to school! And although the fixed perspective seems more accustomed to it, now with this switch, I can really easily imagine everyone acting around things. There is a wonderful feeling, as if everyone is drawing a beautiful circle together () Come on! Looking forward to the next article! I feel so tired after watching it, it almost feels like I'm going over and over again to talk about one point.

Let me remind you, I watched Water Margin at Hogwarts, it was awesome, it was awesome, one hundred thousand words changed five perspectives, Ron became Shi Dalang, the head of the family uprooted the weeping willow, Lucius was wise and wise, Wu Yong, Sirius called Baoyi Song Jiang, the brothers gathered under the command of the Black family, holding high the banner of justice for heaven! Defeat the traitors Dumbledore and Voldemort! ! !

After reading more than thirty chapters, tell me your feelings. The angle is interesting and the content is a bit verbose but interesting. It can be seen that there are a lot of private goods, mainly focusing on the tone of the White Devil conspiracy theory, especially the beginning of deepening Ron's family problems, which is really a bit deviant and surprising. But there is a very important question, who is the protagonist? Is it Ronald? Is it dust? Or Lucius? Why do you switch to first-person perspective every now and then? Are the objects still the same? Anyway, let's look forward to the follow-up. Let's encourage each other.

The writing is really good Matches {conspiracy theory, group portrait, magic reform} in the introduction brackets But it doesn't quite match the title of the book, "Belated Mother's Love", and the large story written in parentheses of the introduction (ancient old-time bloody novel, parents and relatives don't like to regret it). As a result, what people who clicked in want to see is different from the actual content. The overall score is only 6 points and 9, which is too low. Well, at least I wasn't attracted by the title and introduction. I got tired of reading this title and introduction and wouldn't click on it. I came in after reading other people's book reviews about "conspiracy theories, group portraits, magic reform", that is, the good reviews in the first bracketed paragraph of the introduction. In fact, the conspiracy theory of the book is very well written (from a perspective I have never seen before), the group portraits of different protagonists have very unique perspectives, and the reform and development of the magic world is brought to life with refreshing writing. And I have tied it, please give me an update, the author, please keep writing.

Although it is very different from the original work and is anti-Dumbledore, it is really thought-provoking. It feels like it shows the dark side under the calm surface of the original work. It is no longer blindly black and white. I see a lot of the glorious side of human nature. Some things can be seen from another angle and from another person's perspective. The results are completely different. Everyone is working hard for the future and trying to improve their lives.

It feels like the Xuanjian Immortal Clan, with multiple perspectives. Everyone in the family is the protagonist. The overall trend is that the family continues to rise in the struggle for interests in the magic world. It takes advantage of the conflicts of the other 28 sacred tribes. The conspiracy ideas are very reasonable. The many second-generation characters in the family are a highlight.

This is not a novel, and the interpretation of Harry Potter from various perspectives and the setting are quite good, but it is a bit difficult to read. Even though I was reading a novel, I kept praising little Japan afterwards, which made me feel better.

The original work is a children's fairy tale This is a conspiracy by adults Really, so beautiful!

Personally, I like the fantasy novels, the plots are quite reasonable. The private settings were also explained clearly in the first few chapters. I feel that the author has a good grasp of the pace of the book and will not keep the protagonist stuck in the same dilemma. The problem is solved quickly and reasonably (much more comfortable than I have seen before where the villain always bullies the protagonist). The author's multi-perspective writing method is most likely to have no heroine and no CP (personal judgment). I personally like this kind of family love and the main line of building a beautiful magical world. I hope the author can keep writing such an interesting book.

I can't wait to rate it after reading it halfway through... Although the copywriting is terrible, the content is completely different and meticulously arranged, well-founded, and completely different from the original fairy tale. Well, it's not the kind of white-knuckle novel that makes no sense and tries to kill someone without being able to reasonably convince others. It's quite interesting.

What a wonderful perspective and a wonderful feeling. There is a bit less, so after reading it not long ago, my first impression was that it was a bit like the HP version of "My Family's Revolutionary Road in Those Years"? I have to say that this is a style that attracts me very much. Sometimes I like to plan things on a whim. In some chapters, the Weasley family's "Reform Planning Regulations" gave me a "neat" feeling (it may not be an appropriate description, but this is the first word that comes to mind). Although it's a little lacking in places, the style is very similar to the paper books on my bookshelf. Even now, it's still too little, and I'm thinking about whether I should pick it up and watch it again. The style is indeed my favorite, and I hope the author can write it well. Let me briefly talk about the style settings I like: This world is dark and this society is wrong, but everything we are doing is correct. We are revolutionizing, we are changing everything we can, we are correcting our mistakes, and we are letting the world see that this world is not just darkness, but also a bright corner.

Demining! This is a group portrait novel with self-consistent logic, the characters look like normal living people, and the writing is good. I don't like first-person novels, but I didn't feel uncomfortable while reading this book, so the author has a good foundation. The biggest reason for the low score of this book is multiple readers filtering. The filter starts from the first chapter, and readers who are extremely obsessed with the protagonist and don't like conspiracy rumors are directly excluded; the description of brothers and sisters later directly excludes only-child readers [laughing] and readers who do not resonate with families with multiple children; multi-visual first-person also excludes readers who are impatient to read the author's logical puzzles. This is a text chosen by both the author and the reader. The content of this book is a vision of others that is completely separate from the main line of HP. The content is the structurally reshaped HP world. This perspective is indeed very novel. The author uses his own logic to analyze the people and things in the HP world. All the characters' visions are surveillance, giving readers a sense of God's vision. This kind of writing method is relatively niche in online articles. God's Vision is suitable for readers like me who don't take the role of the protagonist when reading a novel. In general, I like to observe the protagonist from different angles and then decide whether I like the protagonist or not. Readers who really like to assume the role of the protagonist may find it uncomfortable or even uncomfortable.

That's great. It's good if it's logical and worthy of the audience's IQ. Either it's a comedy, or it's a little bit normal, and it doesn't feel particularly draggy, even though it expresses a lot of points. The amount of information is also very large, and the pace is quite fast, so it's pretty good. What is the main line? Reform the wizarding world? What are you writing about? Who is the protagonist? It's been so long since you wrote it, not even a year has passed, right? There are too many repetitive contents, it's a bit like a running account, and it's a bit imaginative... But this is a novel! Nice

Awesome! A good book that is delayed by the title, the rhythm progresses step by step. Promoting the plot from different character perspectives, I initially thought that in a classic protagonist story, the protagonist would take up a lot of space, but after looking at it, I felt that the protagonist was more like a hook, igniting the fig leaf of a fairy tale. The analysis of many characters' decision-making psychological stances is very interesting, logical and realistic! The only pity is that the first person is too jumpy, and readers can't jump at all when reading!

I haven't finished it yet, but I want more people to see it. From this perspective, I have never thought of it, and it makes sense. It gives the character a source and provides another interpretation of the original character.

Although I didn't understand it at first, I later learned a lot after reading it again. It felt magical, but also very realistic. The entire article exposed conspiracy theories. Alluding to the darkness of the wizarding world. All in all, the writing is pretty good overall.

It's very interesting and novel, but to be honest, I don't like the first person version very much, but somehow I kept reading. It's very interesting, but it really makes me confused as to what year I am today.

Not to mention anything else, as a principal, Dumbledore was very incompetent in school management.

It's beautiful, but it's too little. Why just a little? It feels like I finished it in less than an hour. It's a bit different. It's not based on our original way of looking at it, but it's narrated in that kind of narrative. Well, according to the introduction, it's not actually like this at first, but when you watch it, you feel this way again. It's weird at first because we haven't seen this kind of narrative. It's the feeling described above, but after you watch it too much, you feel that this kind of thing is very good, and this kind of thing is completely not enough. I hope there can be more. As for Ben, it is best to give it a try before watching it again, because if you are like me, you will not be satisfied after watching it all at once. This kind of thing will make you constantly look forward to what his plot will be like in the future. It's very interesting. I hope the author can update it more. Well, I just finished reading what I just said, and then I wanted to comment quickly. Well, there are still some things that didn't say that this one is a narrative. He wrote it from the main point of view. The first words are from Ron's perspective, and the second words are from the West family, and then the rest of their family is a bit confusing. And then the author may have realized it, and in the later words, he will write whose perspective is in the title. For example, what is the name of the Platinum family in the back? He will write Malfoy's perspective under the title at the front, so it's okay at first but it will be a little confusing in the middle, and then you can understand it later, because even if you don't mark the bottom, whose perspective is below, but if you read more, you can understand whose perspective, and then you can understand better.

The content of this book is very good and the thinking is relatively clear. Well, but there's a problem. The author can change it. It's just that the pronoun changes are very confusing. Sometimes I can't understand it.

It's a nice and novel angle, but who is the protagonist? Later, since Ronald went to the Weasley family, the protagonist told in the first person is not Ronald. It is strange that the character has been changed.

It's a unique way of thinking, but it's indeed logical. Except for the changing of pronouns, everything else is pretty good. When Harry and Ronald start school, can the perspective be fixed on Ronald?

It looks good. When switching the main perspective, it will feel like everyone is the protagonist and is planning for themselves and their family. However, it is recommended to mark the chapter names, otherwise it will be a bit confusing.

I prefer the article from this perspective, and the author also said that it is an imaginative article. You can see a lot of things by changing the different perspectives. Many doubts about the original book are also answered. Regardless of whether it is correct or not, this is also a way of thinking. It is a pity that it is an unfinished article [smile][smile][smile] Alas, I actually saw it from Ron's perspective at the beginning and was attracted by this perspective, so don't add so many other people's opinions. It's indeed a bit exciting, but... You know

The content of the book is very interesting, five stars, but one star will be deducted because the title is too bad [laughs awkwardly] There is a reason for the low rating. The subject matter is novel, but the content is quite messy, the character names are not fixed, some content looks like a machine translation, and sometimes I don't know who the perspective is on. The reading time of this article is short because I mainly read it on a computer, and I have already read almost 200 chapters.

The main perspective keeps changing. Although the whole thing is very good, you don't know whose perspective it is unless you look carefully. It feels like reading a storybook.

It's a pretty good one, it's indeed a very novel perspective, but I often can't tell which people are talking. Maybe it would be better if I could change it a little bit?

I read it and thought it was a new way of writing, and the author also wrote it very well. But maybe I haven't seen anything like this before, and the changing of his perspectives was a bit uncomfortable. But later on, the author may have discovered that it was written in the title. I recommend everyone to take a look and give it a try [Thinking]

The male protagonist's perspective in the first half is very reasonable and nice to watch. The perspective changes many times, which is a very unique way of writing. Give it a score of 9. Later on, if the protagonist's sexual perspective changes, I feel that the protagonist is not strong enough and is coveted by others because of his beauty/bloodline/ability. It is very realistic but very disturbing. I give it a 6 points. Although the ending of mother and daughter is very different from the original work, the characters set in the book will indeed lead to such an ending.