Star Iron, in the Name of Crimson

First: I have no qualities Second: My speech has nothing to do with the country Third: I came to Hubei for tourism (really) Fourth: (driving a Porsche to make a grand appearance) (getting out of the car) She is also a beauty today (holding a rose in her mouth) (rose pierced her mouth) (holding back) (pushing sunglasses) (leaning against the wall) How about... (Sliding) Oops, I... (Backflip on the spot and then turning) (left foot on right foot, right hand grabbing heel) (left hand touching the back of the head) (a front somersault landing steadily) Hi, the teacher wrote so well (The above is epilepsy) The writing is still very good. I really want to see the past experiences of each character. It is also very friendly for people like me who have not watched much of the Star Iron plot.

Is it okay to give yourself a perfect score?

Foundation + MiHoYo + "Pseudoman", etc., The ingredients are complicated, but the author has arranged every aspect very well, and at least the dozens of chapters are quite interesting to read. So, now that you have the Foundation, what are you still looking for? In addition, the writing style of this book is acceptable. All "believers", let's watch the narrator's work together. (It's very subjective, don't make trouble, I'm afraid)

Gua! I want to see a river of blood! Why is it that not only none of the protagonists of Bengtie died, but they also got stronger? Then who can help me fill in the gap that I am missing?

To be honest, this is the first time I have read a book about the polemic circle. Although I don't know what the author's reason was for writing it. But I believe there must be some passion mixed in it. Because when I watch polemic videos, I always feel a surge of passion. I even created a character of my own based on my passion. I also folded the boxes, but the boxes were still a little incomplete because I was too lazy to fold them. But I occasionally think about the polemical circle when reading novels. So I gave it five stars partly because of the elements of the polemic circle. But the author's book overall looks good.

I just hope that the protagonist will not be defeated in the end, or will not be influenced. I always feel that the protagonist will be influenced in the end.

Which version is this Red King based on? If it is the weakest version, it will be a bit choked when compared with Railway World View. If it is other versions, it will be completely defeated.

It feels okay. I feel that having the supreme divinity P in it is a very suitable choice. Just look down and see that you can sweep through the high and low-end rounds with the most basic ones; go up a bit, the nebula is like rain, and the Pangu First Formation in it can also carry the Dream Tin Staff or the supreme divinity of the narrative layer; go up a bit further, in Broken Ode, you can also play high-end rounds other than the Tree of Knowledge; at the top, you can still have his figure, and the Suffering Heavenly Lord mode is enough to continue 55 rounds with those top supremes.

As a loyal believer of Snake Gate (Skeleton Serpent), when will snake be included [laughing]

Systemless is really good

A cool and thoughtful article that will fill in the holes for the foreshadowing you have laid.

Seven seals, seven rings, seven brides, dedicated to the great Crimson King

It was a secret at that time. In fact, the body of the Dragon King is a higher blood. Only by understanding the reality that the King of God is just a clone of Ruijin, that is also a higher narrative layer of the body of the clone.

Although I haven't played any second games, I still think they look good.

Very nice, it makes my brain spin

Still quite interesting.

*Good, very good, very good!

I think it looks pretty

The plot is quite creative [like]

Uh, nothing to say

Awesome, the story is very vividly described

Will a new supreme divinity appear in the future?