I Ask You to Write a Superhero, but You Write a Clown?

Get to know clowns, become clowns, and transcend clowns. We all have a future as clowns. The clown must win. How hardworking and giving people hope, this is what a clown is. Bring joy to this world, let us nuke the earth together... Chongya

The writing is pretty good, there are no brainless villains, and there are not too many words that netizens complain about. The clown plot is also written in a delicate way, which makes me feel like I can read it. Just like the author wrote, reading too many novels of the same type will become boring. I think this book can be at least ranked in the top three of the same type that I have read.

I feel that this is the most comfortable novel of this type that I have ever seen. Without the stupidity of the judges, it is still very good in the same genre.

I personally have not watched the movie "Joker", and I have no way to evaluate it, but through the author's writing, you can quickly understand the process of the entire movie and the plot development of the novel. I can only say that the author is very attentive in describing the entire movie, come on! ! !

I like it very much. The author's description of the movie Joker is very detailed. In fact, when I first watched the movie Joker, I didn't really understand the content here, but after watching it, I felt that I understood it, so I support the author very much and hope that the author will continue writing.

This is the best novel about movie creation that I have ever read. Previous similar novels were based on the popularity, ranking, etc. Of my high-profile movies, to shock the audience in the novel and make readers feel comfortable. However, this is a short-term popularity, so I usually just read it and can't stand it at the beginning. But this novel is very detailed. It depicts the image of the characters and the emotions of the characters in detail, as if you are not writing a novel about creating a movie, but actually creating a movie. When you write a novel in this way, you can write many chapters for a movie, but it also takes a lot of effort to write a movie. I can only say that the author really put his heart into writing this novel, and this novel is also very beautiful. What makes me most satisfied with this novel is that it allows me to understand and immerse myself in the character without having seen the movie or even the clips. Among all the movie novels I have read, this is the best. Among other creative film novels I have read, if you don't know anything about the movie about which the novel is written, you may suddenly not understand the content of the novel while watching it. The preface and follow-up may even be inconsistent, and there are inexplicable twists and turns. Sometimes you even think you have missed a chapter or two. But this novel is different. This novel, even if you don't know the movie Joker at all, can understand the development of the plot, and there will be no behavior that makes readers who have never seen the movie feel inexplicable. In my opinion, the most important thing about a novel is to make readers empathize. No matter what kind of novel it is, it is very important for readers to empathize with each other, otherwise it will not retain readers. However, many novels that I have read that create movies may be because the readers themselves have a certain understanding of the movies created by the novels. Authors have gradually neglected this aspect. If you don't understand movies and don't understand movies, you may find yourself unable to keep up with the chapters, unable to understand the behavior of the characters in the novel, or even the content may be incorrect. In this case, readers may not understand the novel. It is impossible to sympathize with novels, but all the authors of novels that I have seen create movies have ignored this point. Until I saw this one, I was introduced by the title of the book at first, but after reading it for a while, I was attracted by the content, and I unconsciously continued reading. At the critical moment of the plot, even I will watch it repeatedly, think about it, and think deeply about the meaning of the plot. Also, author, in fact, some of the parts that you think are dragging are actually supplementing the world view in my opinion. In my opinion, blindly advancing the main line is not good. The fullness of the characters is often reflected in small scenes bit by bit. Through the evaluation of book friends, I also think it is better to be more rigorous: this book is the best among all creative film novels I have read so far.

Among novels of the same type, as of the current chapter, this book is considered relatively good. The author's writing style is more delicate. In short, I recommend it and I hope the author can continue to write more. Tip: So far, there is no obvious possibility of a female protagonist plot. I also suggest that this kind of novel generally does not have a female protagonist.

Come on, keep updating, at least you write seriously and your writing is good [Like][Like]

Some netizens' comments in the book may seem a bit embarrassing, but they are not poisonous. I am a serious DC enthusiast. Regardless of netizens, the plot of the movie is quite good. The details and emotions are all appropriate to my taste. The pace is not too slow or lengthy. It is normal for everyone to have different interpretations of the movie. It's okay for some people to argue, but don't make me feel embarrassed for you. I decided to pursue it with five stars. This kind of subject is really difficult to write. "The Killing Joke" is a 46-page comic. Alan Moore's text manuscript has more than 130 pages and 160,000 Chinese characters, not to mention an NB movie. I hope the author can work hard.

Five-star praise. The praise does not mean that this book is not well-written, powerful, or has strict logic, but one thing I must admit is that of all the books about clowns that I have read so far, this is the first one that has such a profound understanding of clowns, and the most complete narration, without changing the original work out of mindless fun. This is good. I hope that the next work will be like the first part. If it is good, I will continue to follow it. Come on

It's okay. Basically, there are no breakdowns. In my opinion, it's not a big problem. The plot development is quite connected. I haven't read the background story of the clown, but I feel like I have seen one or two clips of it through your description. I don't know if it's my problem or yours. Anyway, I can't post my works here, so I can only tell you about them in book reviews here. We'll see your follow-up development before deciding to comment.

The writing is very good and detailed, better than most books. Keep it first. Feature 1: The pace is slow, so viewers, take your time, you won't be able to eat hot tofu in a hurry. In a fast-paced era, there is always something to slow down, right? Feature 2: Analysis of a movie, very good analysis. I haven't paid much attention to books on this subject, so I won't make any judgments. But overall the book as a whole is very good. Suggestion: The pace is too fast now. If you want to write more delicately and more explosively without conflict, you can read a certain Gu by Daai Xianzun. You can learn from it. Remember, delicacy and coolness are not in conflict.

I can see the seriousness of the author. I like both the plot and the original movie.

It's a very good book. The author is trying to figure out the various complex psychology of the clown, and the writing is very delicate and true. However, I think Heath Ledger is better for the role of the clown. Can Heath Ledger be used in the next movie?

This is the first time I decided to watch this kind of subject. I am honored to have chosen this work. You are considered awesome [I learned it]

It's well written, and you can tell that the author took "Joker" very seriously. The "Joker" part is well written, but the rhythm is weird. Sometimes the plot advances a long way and suddenly switches to the audience's barrage; sometimes the plot advances a part or a short period and then suddenly jumps to someone's empathy. It's okay to write like this, but it's too frequent. It's similar to a movie where you suddenly dance and sing at the climax. Although it is careful, it looks good and is related to the main plot. There are also good points in the dance, and it is well connected with the subsequent plot, but the audience looks awkward and always jumps around. It makes the impression very bad (at least that's how I feel) But I believe the author will write better and better in the future

The author wrote it well and didn't specifically target the protagonist. But when writing later, the author should not make others look too stupid. For example, all good things belong to the protagonist, and people also have good ideas. Their writing may not be as good as the protagonist, but they can also write good works that are different from the past. The protagonist here is more like a pioneer, and the people behind him are constantly expanding based on this pioneering work. It is said that there must be some smart people in the back who can compete with the protagonist or be evenly matched. This will be more fun, right? [Laughing evilly][laughing evilly][laughing evilly]

It's good to read. I really like this type of novel. I wish there was no female protagonist. I don't really want to watch emotional dramas, I just like to see the male protagonist focus on his career. Even if there is a female protagonist in the future, I hope there won't be too many scenes.

The author worked hard to express the feeling of the movie in words. It can be seen that the author worked hard and put his own efforts into it. Instead of just writing a fresh topic to make money, write this seriously and it will be great. Just don't stop updating halfway.

The author writes very well! ! Have your own understanding! Support, support (*๓´╰╯`๓)♡

The writing is very delicate and beautiful. Come on, the author, write more and don't give up! ! !

It's very good. It not only restores "Joker", but also shows Arthur's good and evil in details.

This version of "Joker" can be said to be the most unique existence among superhero movies. It does not have cool special effects and fighting, but tells the story of a marginalized person in society. The protagonist Arthur is a low-level man living in Gotham City. He suffers from mental illness but dreams of becoming a stand-up comedian. His life is full of pain and frustration, and the indifference and injustice of society make him feel desperate. Under such circumstances, Arthur gradually went crazy, and he began to use violence and crime to vent his anger. The Joker in the movie is not a villain in the traditional sense, but a victim who is forced into a desperate situation by society. Although his behavior is extreme, it makes people feel sympathetic and understanding. Joaquin Phoenix's performance is also very good, he plays the role of the Joker to the fullest. His smile was creepy and his eyes felt desperate and sad. His performance completely immersed the audience in the clown's world and felt his pain and madness. Overall, this is a very wonderful movie that not only shows the darkness of society and the complexity of human nature, but also gives the audience a new understanding of superhero movies.

Thanks to the author for bringing this wonderful movie to my attention It has become a little pistachio.

The story is good, fresh and suitable for my taste! Well written, keep it up! !

The article is relatively detailed, mainly because the audience area of ​​the global competition is a bit 😅. As for the psychological analysis of the Chou Emperor, well... I feel that the Chou Emperor will be a little crazier. Overall, the writing is very good [Like] [Like]

It's really good-looking, really good-looking. In fact, I didn't finish it until I read about 40 chapters, but I'm really afraid that the author won't update it, so I just commented, hoping to give the author some hope. It's really good-looking, and the emotions are handled very delicately. I actually didn't understand the Joker at all, but I can understand it after reading the author's work.

Although I have never seen the movie Joker, I am familiar with it through your description. The author writes very well. I hope you will continue to do so and not stop updating.

Not bad, there weren't that many doubts at first. The mentor didn't contradict the protagonist either. That's why I give you 4 stars. It would be better if the instructor could evaluate the audience before making a comment, and the speed would be updated.

Not bad. I finished reading the Joker chapter in one go. When I watched The Dark Knight, I felt that the description of the movie details was a bit too much (personal feeling). I even felt that it was not as good as watching a movie with commentary. Personally, I felt that it might be better if the movie had less description.