History********

It's okay. It's quite objective and doesn't over exaggerate and brag about Ying Zheng. I didn't do any unofficial history either. It's just that there are too few descriptions of historical figures in the book, and it's all about telling stories.

Objectively speaking, there is nothing wrong with this when evaluating Qin Shihuang.

Come on, come on, come on

Come on, come on, come on!

Okay, basically there is nothing wrong with it. I just want to break this paragraph down a little more. At first glance, it is a long paragraph. Except for historical facts, I hope that the best paragraph should not exceed three, four, four, or five lines. In this case, it is quite good [send heart]

Very good, very good

Come on, come on, it looks good

The evaluation is objective and has sufficient historical facts

What's next? Where does the author read it?

It's pretty good-looking, and some of it is fairly objective.

When will the new book be released?

It's very good. The evaluation is objective and not biased. It's very good.