I have left myself in the past, I have been trapped by this shackles, and I have also been in a cage, questioning my qualifications and efforts. "Hey, don't be discouraged! When you made your choice, you knew that the journey would be difficult and dangerous, but you still ran along this secluded path. Did you believe in 'fate' at that time?" She said.
When I raised my right fist under the flag, I knew that this was where I would dedicate my life. I will stand on the boundary between life and death; I will face emotional and rational choices. I am full of ideals for the future, and I will practice my original intention of holding my right fist.
The wolfish ambition of the disaster has been exposed, and no one can ignore it. We stand here, we still stand here, we look at the future with the flag flying, we will be invincible.
Some people watch from the sidelines, and some people watch from the other side, swallowing the flesh and blood of innocent people, and making a lot of money; some people have ideals, and some people get involved with their own lives, just wishing that thousands of houses have lights and smoke.
Here is a story about a group of people.
(Part of the settings are inspired by the game, Battle Double: Pamish)
(Part of the name is taken from, Zhanshuang: Pamish, Azur Lane, etc.)
Reader comments
Obviously, the author has insufficient experience in multi-threaded operations. Personally, I think it was the first time I wrote a book that I chose the first-person perspective and multi-line narrative. Coincidentally, both methods tested my writing skills.
Using the first person requires creating an "authority-obsessed" atmosphere, and whether this can be achieved remains to be seen.
As for group portraits and multi-line narratives, it is particularly important to grasp the three-dimensional character creation. Does the article achieve this? I think there is still room for improvement.
In addition, the mosaic processing of multiple story lines is not good, and each line feels unrelated to each other. You must understand that the "different paths lead to the same destination" for each line, and the plot points need to be shown. The simplest example is that Chapter 17 reflects the impact of other story lines in the form of news.
You need to always remember what you said in your introduction: "This is the story of a group of people."
In short, as the cover page of the book says, this is a "potentially good book." [Eat melon]
Brothers, yes, remember to write an outline, remember to back up your outline and settings, don't ask why [star]
Obviously, the author has insufficient experience in multi-threaded operations. Personally, I think it was the first time I wrote a book that I chose the first-person perspective and multi-line narrative. Coincidentally, both methods tested my writing skills. Using the first person requires creating an "authority-obsessed" atmosphere, and whether this can be achieved remains to be seen. As for group portraits and multi-line narratives, it is particularly important to grasp the three-dimensional character creation. Does the article achieve this? I think there is still room for improvement. In addition, the mosaic processing of multiple story lines is not good, and each line feels unrelated to each other. You must understand that the "different paths lead to the same destination" for each line, and the plot points need to be shown. The simplest example is that Chapter 17 reflects the impact of other story lines in the form of news. You need to always remember what you said in your introduction: "This is the story of a group of people." In short, as the cover page of the book says, this is a "potentially good book." [Eat melon] Brothers, yes, remember to write an outline, remember to back up your outline and settings, don't ask why [star]
Is the US military too diorama?