The Old Master Returns to 1988

There is a lot of useful information. It can be seen that the author has checked a lot of information and is supported by very professional knowledge. Although because of this, many people, including me, find it difficult to follow and understand many parts, it is not important. After all, it is worthy of four or five stars just because of the author's serious attitude. The shortcomings are also obvious, it is too macro and too fast-paced, just like reading an outline. Of course, the advantage of this is that there are many small plots in the provinces that are boring, cumbersome, and even prone to poisonous points. It can only be said that the advantages and disadvantages of this writing method are obvious. Another point is that it can be seen that the author is inexperienced in writing online articles. The text is written in long paragraphs with too few paragraphs, which can easily dazzle the reader. Fortunately, I listen to books. But in general, the rating shouldn't be so low.

This book is really awesome. Please write it quickly. I will vote for you.

I am not an ordinary person who wrote this book. It is the first time I have read it and written it in such detail.

It's all macro-information, and the author is definitely a big shot in the Ministry of Information. If you want to write modern writing, you can save it as an outline and just add plot details. This article is all dry stuff and there is no story advancement.

I have never read such a good book, great!

The author is awesome. He analyzes various situations, data and information in detail! It can become a reference book for period science and technology articles and urban science and technology articles!

To sum up in one sentence, it is the growth path of a terminalist.

I have a feeling that the author may have been born in economics

This is the person who can write books, and the others who write running accounts are all little Karami.

Heifer, upside down cow