Across Time************

Tomato is a rare good book. I feel that Tomato is not worthy of him. The shortcomings are also obvious, although in my opinion they are advantages. That is, the author's point of view is too clear, and the arguments presented are chain-linked, making it difficult for those who have different opinions from the author to find out in the book review area, which makes it very uncomfortable. Those with a bad temper will abandon the book directly, while those with a gentle temper will feel more and more uncomfortable as they read. I divide readers into three groups: novices, middle readers, and bookworms. There is no distinction between them. They are all what the author needs to add. Only a certain group of novices will like a book with clear logic like yours. Most novices only like routine writing because they pursue refreshing and do not want to use their brains. Readers who have the same views as the author will feel that this is a magical book, because the author has demonstrated his own views in an orderly manner, and they will have a strong sense of pleasure. Readers who disagree with the author's point of view will simply abandon the book. There are two types of bookworms: the non-vegetarian type and the prejudiced type. If you rule out those who are biased against your type of book and don't read it, all the old bookworms will fall in love with your book. Of course, there are also colleagues and readers who specialize in causing trouble, which I won't mention here. In short, this is a niche literary book that is not liked by most novices and some Chinese and white readers. Among the Chinese and Belarusian readers, there is no reasonable guest. Some of them will be persuaded by the author to support his point of view, while others will not. These people will feel more and more uncomfortable as they read. There is a reason why this book has a low rating, because the author is too logical and has clear views, which seems very strong and aggressive to many people. It is difficult for them to find rebuttal points and they cannot vent their opinions. Naturally, it is difficult for this book to get a high score.

The opinions are biased, but that's normal. In many places, it's much better than the same kind of articles. At least it's not the kind of charming ancestor who glorifies feudal emperors and is always there for me. The more you watch it, the weirder it becomes, whether it's some opinions or inappropriate witty remarks... It smells like a man.

Different from the general ancient movie viewing articles, it is not mindless blowing and criticizing. It analyzes the rise and fall of the dynasty in depth, just like the problem of the Qin Dynasty cannot be solved by the death of one or two people.

I feel that the author is very literate. He has really done research and checked a lot of information. I can learn a lot of knowledge that I have never understood before. Five stars.

It is a refreshing article that analyzes issues at a deeper level, which is different from ordinary live broadcast articles. It's refreshing and very readable. Anyway, personally I like it. [Like][Like][Like]

This is the most reasonable historical imagination article I have ever read, and it is also the historical imagination article I want most. It does not overly praise a dynasty or its characters, nor does it deliberately slander a dynasty (such as the Qing Dynasty). Disclaimer: I don't mean to whitewash the Qing Dynasty. It's hard to say. After all, feudal dynasties are all selfish. Everyone hopes that their country will be passed down to eternity. However, the Qing Dynasty happened to be at this point in time). It is basically evaluated from an objective and fair perspective (personal opinion: it seems that Zhu Yuanzhang is overrated). Therefore, this novel is still worth recommending.

It's really good. It can be seen that the author has a strong historical background. The evaluation of historical figures is also relatively objective. It's quite surprising to see such quality in a novel of this type. Come on, author [like][like][like]

The language is quite humorous, and the overall structure and rhythm are good. Very readable. Many historical views may be different from what the public thinks, and may even make people uncomfortable at first glance. But every time the author's subsequent explanations are mostly reasonable and self-justifying, at least they are the opinions of the whole family and are not simple self-media brainwashing packages. Sometimes it's interesting to see different perspectives. The main reason is that the author's writing style is very fluent, and even if the opinions are not consistent with his heart, it will not make people unable to read.

I prefer books with clear viewpoints now, and I can't stand articles with lukewarm, eccentric or even secretly dissing viewpoints, even if your viewpoints are completely different from mine. In my opinion, the flaw of this book is that it still stands high from the standpoint of modern people, but when thinking of exporting to ancient times, this high ground is inevitable. Therefore, I still prefer the kind of videos that look like modern people, and somehow the routine was seen by the ancients. When the video is released, you can directly say that it is thinking and digging into ancient history. Mainly because our modern understanding of ancient times is constantly changing with archeology, and we may make many mistakes if we stand high in the modern world. Of course, when I read this kind of article, I will naturally ignore it and use the author's point of view to supplement my understanding of history. In this regard, this book is very qualified, because most historical live broadcast articles have me picking their faults, and there are not many high-quality articles that instill knowledge in me.

The most authentic book I have read, nb. Most of the explanations are that I have not read in other similar books and have no impression of them. Take the imperial examination as an example. In Tomato's other similar books, when it comes to the imperial examination, it must be used for dynasties that have not appeared before. It is really very detailed.

I think this book is very hard-core, without losing objective analysis and subjective appraisal, and at the same time, it can properly show some of the inner contradictions and psychological activities of the characters in the book. It is written very objectively, and it feels like it was written very seriously. If it is more fun, it is okay, at least without losing the rigor, it still has a humorous style. Personally, I like it better. I think it is worth five stars, but my personal level is not very good. I feel that my CPU is burning a bit [face covering] [face covering] [face covering] But I am also very grateful for this article. After all, who can miss such an article that improves oneself and is objective and beautiful? Now that I have read about the first 30 chapters, if the subsequent plot development is not well written, everyone should understand it objectively. It feels good, the author, please do it [like] [eating melon]

Better than most male authors [like]

Not bad. There are praises and criticisms of history, but it is basically objective. The content is solid and there is a lot of useful information in one chapter. For history novices or people who like to read historical derivatives, this is a solid historical entertainment commentary. But there are also some poisonous points. After all, the heroine evaluates history based on her own preferences. It's normal that some people don't like it.

It's very beautiful. I think the author's literary and historical skills are very strong, and there's nothing messy about it. In the past, my biggest fear when reading this type of writing was that the author didn't have enough historical literacy and would mess up. I think the author of this book should have researched a lot of information and understood it very well. I just wrote it very well and it was logical.

It's really good-looking, and I also learned some interesting remarks and sayings from it. The images of historical figures are not off-kilter. They are pretty much the same. They are serious when they should be serious and funny when they should be funny. It is very interesting. Only this historical explanation is the most convincing. The author has a large reserve of knowledge, substantial content, well-founded, novel viewpoints, and thorough analysis. Other writings are too frivolous, full of laughter and curses, and can't see beyond the point of view. After all, historical figures are all human sperm. They may be shocked by the development of modern society, but they will not be deeply concerned about the nature of the times. The nobles do not want to change, but the poor cannot change. They will only cling to the incomplete and muddle along. Then this so-called live broadcast of history turned into a show off of the times, and a display of modern people's arrogance in front of the ancients. This is why this article is really down to earth, it really takes those histories and characters seriously. What we have is a more excellent system and a more complete system, a more comfortable life and a broader vision, and these are all due to the spiral of the times and the bloody battles of our ancestors. We can be proud, but we cannot show off arrogantly, because those famous ancients are not one or one in a thousand in the court or on the battlefield. Playing with your own mind or teasing others is just a trap and deceiving yourself. Of course, the modern part of this article is not very well written. It is a bit bloody and cliche. If you encounter it, just turn the page and skip it. Most readers should like historical live broadcasts and ancient plots, and have no interest in the heroine's family background and modern plots.

The language is fluent, the character creation is reasonable, and the historical deduction is relatively self-explanatory (although there are violent remarks, it does not affect the reading). It's the author's oral habits that make people wonder if he is from Shaanxi or Shanxi [laughing][laughing][laughing]

I didn't expect to catch up with the latest chapter so quickly. I love reading it. I saw some people saying that the heroine's views are incorrect and biased, but in my opinion, the heroine's three views are correct enough, and she also outputs some personal opinions and is logically consistent, which is enough. I came here to read novels. Those who like to engage in historical research, please read the books written by experts and scholars, and don't dictate here.

I think the writing is very good. It's rare to see this kind of live broadcast article that objectively evaluates history without licking the emperors, generals, and ministers. I will rank it with the article next door to support the Communist Party. I just finished reading it in one go and couldn't bear to read it. I suggest the author to update it 10 times a day and start a new book at the same time👉🏼👈🏼🥺

One of the few historical texts that I read seriously. I have my own views and opinions on ancient contradictions, and my analysis is relatively thorough. It can be seen that the author has really collected a lot of information. [Like][Like][Like]

This is the first time I know how terrible it is to tear apart historical fan circles. The author is not a compilation of national history, so it's okay to have his own bias, and he didn't deliberately misrepresent history, and he didn't praise the feudal system, which is great. Please keep up the good work, the author. There are some novels that seem relaxing and amusing. It's okay to have some that make you think for yourself.

It has depth and is not poisonous. You can take a look at [Adoration][Adoration]

It is a rare Wan Chao Live novel that provides a profound and objective evaluation of history. I'm really tired of reading books with mindless boasts and Spring and Autumn style of writing. In addition, from a historical perspective, I do not think that the third social change occurred in the late Tang Dynasty. Although the small landlord class entered the historical stage, I feel that the centralized system has not yet reached its peak (the peak was in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the author made it very clear). In essence, the role of the small landlord class and the powerful families is the same, so our country has not entered the next stage of social change and is still a feudal centralized country.

It's a bit of a policy statement. Although the whole picture is opened from a God's perspective, it can be seen that the author has a solid historical background and has his own unique insights into historical events. It is much more interesting than most articles about air systems that are written every day, every second, every second on earth.

Great book! It is worth recommending. It gives a thorough understanding of history.

It's a good book, but it belittles you in Tomato. The author has thought about how to solve the problems of various dynasties and does not blindly praise or belittle. It makes people feel that the author has his own thoughts and opinions and has good history. It makes me, a 13-year-old bookworm, want to read more. Anyway, good luck to the author. I have read dozens of Tomato Canopy novels, and yours is the only one that I think the author should open on a better platform. By the way, the author is awesome [laughs]

After reading so many books, this is the best review article I have ever written. It is explained thoroughly (the analysis is meaningful). Although the story is not exciting enough, the author's writing style is enough for me to read through [like] Many people write too broad, and lose interest after reading dozens of chapters [face covering]

After reading so many novels of this kind that communicate history, I think this one is the best. It's not a similar literal statement. People with intelligence will not be embarrassed. Come on, keep going, I will chase you every day! ! !

After spending a day and two nights reading it carefully, everyone won't lose money by investing in it. I prefer the author to write a personal line for the heroine, because I want to know how people with this kind of thinking solve problems in life, and I also want to see what help ancient people can give her. Also, I really want to see the confrontation between Confucius and Zhu Xi. I think the author must make this book return to a novel mode, because you have a heroine and a character, which means that the character must be three-dimensional. Although generally speaking, the expression represented by the protagonist represents the expression of the author, but first I have to know what the protagonist is like, right? What I see now is the author, I don't see the heroine. In the early stage, the heroine had a daily plot, and I felt that she had landed well. Now that the daily plot has been compressed, I feel uncomfortable from the perspective of God a thousand years later. And the comment section has been saying that the heroine is too extreme and the heroine is contradictory. So first of all, who is the heroine? Is it the author or Xiao Panpan. So since it's Xiao Panpan, you have to understand why she is extreme and contradictory, right? She has a scumbag relative, and her living environment since she was a child has shaped her current character of being a mother to her younger sister. I think it is normal. The comment section thinks that she should be selfish, so I think she is willing to share the burden because she can't bear the suffering of her sister, her mother, and kind people. What's wrong? No?

When I first read the introduction, I felt like it was just another mindless follow-up. But as I continued reading, I found that the author had actually researched the information and had his own thinking, and was not someone who touts individualist heroic views of history. I was so excited to read it, so cheers!

This is the best quality book I have seen in Tomato. It analyzes the deep-seated issues of each dynasty very thoroughly.