Bullshit**

As the name suggests, the author undoubtedly has a negative view on groups. But things have meaning when they exist. Even though organisms have evolved to this day, group organisms can still survive very well, which proves that groups have their own significance. In some aspects, the existence of groups can achieve goals more efficiently.

It's too advanced and I can't understand it. Can anyone give me some advice?

As the book says, people tend to lose themselves in groups and follow the crowd. This reminds me of the characters in "1984" who lost their ability to think under the oppression of collectivism. However, "The Crowd" also made me understand that we must maintain independent thinking and not be influenced by the group. This book is very helpful for understanding social phenomena and interpersonal relationships. I recommend it to you!

The genuine book has the same content as the physical book I spent more than 20 yuan on. I highly recommend it. Well, it's so conscientious. I spent more than 20 yuan on it.

My feeling is that this book provides a relatively objective description of some characteristics of groups and can help us understand the behavior of groups to a great extent. I am ashamed that although I have read nearly 1/2 of the book, I have not yet thought of any good examples to illustrate the usefulness of this book to us. This is not the case with this book. The limitation of the book is that my language is not sufficient. One thing I want to explain is that group is not a derogatory term, but a neutral term. Groups are not all bad. Some groups can have good influence, but relatively few, but this cannot deny the existence of good groups [Love] [Love]

After reading this book, I understood why "three people become a tiger". Groups are impulsive, irritable, irrational, and overly exaggerated about emotions. Their numerical superiority makes it easy for people to have the illusion of decisive power, as if nothing is impossible in the world. This feeling makes groups do great or, on the contrary, very destructive things. Humans are social animals, have a tendency to converge, and are afraid of becoming an outlier, so they always follow the decisions of the group. I hope we can grasp the relationship between the group and the individual, not lose ourselves in the group, and have our own judgment and understanding.

You can only understand part of it. Only by combining it with your own feelings and experiences can you know something.

A good book. If Capital is a martial art, this book is a mental skill that matches it. The author is also a great expert in the West, but it's a pity that I read this book a little late.

The book is a good book, so it requires membership.

It's really good-looking and gives me a new understanding of the development stage of the entire society and country.

Awesome, I need a membership

It is a good book and provides many conclusive things. However, due to the limitations of the times, some ideas need to be viewed dialectically now.

The intelligence of the group is lower than that of the individual

Facts speak louder than words

A group of people have different opinions on different things and hold their own opinions

If you don't understand group psychology, you won't be able to understand today's social network environment. You can ignore the crowd, but you can't implement it without understanding the principles.

The one who rides the horse is really well written. What's going on? How come the guy who stepped on the horse became a VIP?