The Golden List Spans Ten Thousand Dynasties, Taking Stock of the Ten Most Prosperous Emperors!

Four points for now, keep writing! Some prosperous times can be praised but also criticized at the same time. Especially the interaction between the emperor and the people. Also, let me remind you that the Manchu Qing Dynasty never regarded Han people as common people. He just treats him as a domestic slave [smile] In addition, I hope you won't criticize other historical figures just to praise someone. This is especially serious in many similar historical inventory articles and videos!

Give it a try with four stars first. If there is no problem with the following content, then continue reading. To be honest, this prosperous age should not be given to Qin Shihuang and Han Wu Emperor. These two are very strong in other aspects, but the people's livelihood and economy are really hard to describe. To be honest, there are really many people who are mindlessly bragging about Qin Shihuang and Han Wu Emperor.

I'll give it four stars first. To be specific, the history is very well written, with clear distinctions from achievements to faults. It's a good historical novel. If possible, I'll give it five stars. Four stars is conservative. [Laugh][laugh][laugh] Besides, it's so slow [eat melon] [eat melon] [eat melon]

Four stars, mainly because of the Jin and Qing Dynasties, which is a bit hard for me to accept, but what the author wrote makes sense. Since these two dynasties are on the list, the Renxuan rule of the Ming Dynasty should also be able to do so, because I see that other comments have not mentioned this.

It's quite objective, but the Taikang of the Jin Dynasty is too different. I think the prosperous Western Han Dynasty had Wenjing and Zhaoxuan, the Eastern Han Dynasty had Mingzhang and Yongyuan, the Sui Dynasty had Kaihuang, the Tang Dynasty had Zhenguan and Kaiyuan, and the Ming Dynasty had Yongle and Renxuan. Taikang would not be around no matter what.

I have read a lot of historical inventory articles before. I can say that although I may not be able to accurately evaluate your book, but in my opinion, the author, you have written very well and your inventory of the prosperous times is also objective and fair. I hope you can work hard to continue writing and maintain the current quality. Come on!

Very nice! Write more about emperors who are not popular! These guys are all tired of seeing it!

The author's writing is really great [blowing kiss], the merits are clear, and it seems that he has done his homework well [in progress], and some details are handled very well [like] The character's personality is very appropriate, making people feel deeply involved, and very real [heartfelt], I am very much looking forward to Zhu Yuanzhang's performance after knowing that Zhu Di became the emperor [eat melon] The author is very good [stop], it would be great if there could be more [please update] It is recommended that the author update quickly. I saw from the comment area of another book that if an author stops updating for 15 days, the author's side will hide the book or something. Anyway, people who have not added the book to the bookshelf will not be able to see the book. So, author, what are you waiting for? Get mad! ! [Please update]

This book is a good introduction to the merits and demerits of the emperor, please continue to work hard.

I finished it in one day, it's pretty good-looking, I feel it's well-written, and it respects the historical facts very much.

At present, it seems to be quite objective, and the good and bad aspects of each "prosperity" have been clearly pointed out. I have read a book before that also lists the top ten prosperous times. The first one is Hongwu. It really made me doubt my life.

Give me four stars first, keep up the good work

Come on, I really like your insistence on looking at the feudal dynasty from an objective perspective. Isn't it really because he wrote a book about the Qing Dynasty that he died?

It's well written, but it's only three-tenths of the way through and it's gone. Why. [Cover face][cover face][cover face]

The author is great, and he talks about both pros and cons. Unlike other novels, he either praises it to death or belittles it to death.

The writing is very good, very objective, and does not have a strong subjective will. I once read an inventory of novels and it showed a strong subjective will. Emperor Hongwu is not among the top ten emperors.

It's one of the few books that is more in line with real history. I just can't read more in one day. It's not enough.

It feels more objective, all the pros and cons are discussed, there is official history, and there are subsequent development and corrections, and the language is not very modern. It is just discontinued. It is a pity that after waiting for so long, I don't know if the author gave up.

The merits are not outweighed by the faults. It is the most objective and comprehensive Golden List novel I have ever read.

Give me four first, I'm afraid your high score will be banned

Not bad, good, good

Keep up the good work [love] [love]

It's very possible

I think it's okay

There was a prosperous age in feudal society. Productivity and imperial power were constantly developing. It was generally certain that the further we advanced, the more we would fall behind.

Okay, the author keeps writing.

Objective facts and clear narrative